Marika Cifor: I want to thank the orga­niz­ers and all of you for being here today. I’m very excit­ed to be a part of what I under­stand is start­ing these con­ver­sa­tions in Design Media Arts. I’m going to focus pri­mar­i­ly today on the ped­a­gog­i­cal end of what I do here at UCLA, and con­clude a bit by talk­ing about the research I’m just begin­ning for my dis­ser­ta­tion, which does take up some of these issues as well.

What I’m argu­ing pri­mar­i­ly today is that focus­ing on ped­a­gogy (I’m going to be talk­ing most­ly about for­mal ped­a­gogy in the class­room with under­grad­u­ates.) is a key aspect of social jus­tice work, and that teach­ing crit­i­cal data lit­er­a­cy along with oth­er dig­i­tal lit­er­a­cy skills is a key part of what we need to do.

I’m going to talk about two dif­fer­ent cours­es. The first is one that I’ve pro­posed but have not yet taught on gen­der, sex­u­al­i­ty, and dig­i­tal cul­ture. The idea for this course came from my own inter­est and engage­ment with ideas on the fem­i­nist Internet, as well as teach­ing. I was a TA in the Intro to LGBT Studies class, and we got to the end and real­ized that we real­ly had­n’t done much with dig­i­tal cul­ture, and is it real­ly a respon­si­ble and effec­tive with our under­grad­u­ates to talk about what being LTBTQ means, or the poten­tial­i­ties for LGBTQ iden­ti­ty and life today with­out talk­ing about the digital?

I’ve also found, relat­ed to that, that talk­ing about the dig­i­tal is a very pow­er­ful way to talk about social jus­tice with under­grad­u­ates. It already has a key rel­e­van­cy to their every­day lives, and it can make some dif­fi­cult con­cepts eas­i­er to grasp in that way, when there’s already at least some kind of lev­el of under­stand­ing and engage­ment. It also height­ens the impor­tance of doing that work.

This course takes on a num­ber of key ques­tions. Thinking about what it means in the dig­i­tal age to think about gen­der and sex­u­al­i­ty, both how notions of iden­ti­ty and embod­i­ment change with the dig­i­tal, how those notions of gen­der and sex­u­al­i­ty don’t change with­in dig­i­tal, and how those trans­late into new forms of media. And so I want to give you a cou­ple of exam­ples from each of the class­es I’m going to talk about, some of what hap­pens there.

This is just one of the units (this’ll become clear­er when I talk about my own research as well), but I’m par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ed in how sex­u­al­i­ty trans­lates onto the Internet and how ideas of embod­i­ment work in a dig­i­tal space. And I think that this unit of the course focus­es on how the dig­i­tal affects our feel­ings and rela­tion­ships, as doc­u­ment­ed in dig­i­tal tech­nolo­gies and how those dig­i­tal tech­nolo­gies might alter, aug­ment, or dis­tance the way peo­ple relate to one anoth­er, and how the Internet inter­venes into the prove­nance of the body.

Topics in this sec­tion include, of course, online dat­ing and rela­tion­ships, pornog­ra­phy, research on sex on the Internet, both what we can learn about sex and sex­u­al­i­ty from what peo­ple are search­ing in par­tic­u­lar. There’s real­ly fas­ci­nat­ing Big Data work on what you can learn from what peo­ple are search­ing about their inter­ests, desires, etc. and what you can’t learn, how those truths are reflect­ed or not in a dig­i­tal space.

This sec­tion of course deals also with the impli­ca­tions for how dat­ing and rela­tion­ships look dif­fer­ent on the Internet. The pos­si­bil­i­ties for com­mu­ni­ty, as well as issues think­ing about the poten­tial for crowd­sourc­ing (you’ll see there’s an arti­cle on Kickstarting trans) and how that might engage peo­ple in dif­fer­ent com­mu­ni­ties and iden­ti­ty prac­tices that they were not engaged in before, or expand­ing those com­mu­ni­ties in new ways.

The oth­er course I want to talk briefly about is one that I’m teach­ing right now to thir­ty under­grad­u­ates. It’s one of our core cours­es, or one of our three cours­es offered to under­grad­u­ates in Information Studies. It’s a GE course, so it’s open to any under­grad­u­ate. We don’t have our own major at the moment in Information Studies. Our depart­ment has an explic­it social mis­sion, and it’s one of the rea­sons that many of us as stu­dents and fac­ul­ty are drawn to this depart­ment and to this discipline.

This course takes a very explic­it focus on social jus­tice to inves­ti­gate the polit­i­cal, the eco­nom­ic, the legal, and the tech­no­log­i­cal aspects of the way in which infor­ma­tion is cre­at­ed, accessed, used, con­trolled, dis­card­ed, and destroyed. It draws on a huge and inter­dis­ci­pli­nary set of lit­er­a­ture from infor­ma­tion stud­ies and relat­ed fields, and it focus­es par­tic­u­lar­ly on the dig­i­tal and on con­tem­po­rary events to explore issues of infor­ma­tion and power.

I want to talk briefly here about one unit of the course. Whether or not there are in fact dig­i­tal divides and who might be… Is divide” even a use­ful way of con­cep­tu­al­iz­ing dif­fer­en­tial access? Is Internet access a human right, and if it is how do we actu­al­ly enact that? Ginsburg’s work focus­es par­tic­u­lar­ly on the use of indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties to rethink and to explore in new ways their own iden­ti­ties and to give peo­ple access to indige­nous knowl­edges. This unit also, I have the priv­i­lege of bring­ing in two of my fan­tas­tic col­leagues who are doing a very impor­tant project on police data prac­tices, and their work is able to talk to give an impor­tant instance of what crit­i­cal data stud­ies are.

And I think crit­i­cal data stud­ies are an impor­tant seg­ment of that larg­er project of teach­ing social jus­tice because we live in a world where data is con­stant­ly being col­lect­ed about us. We’re con­stant­ly cre­at­ing data, but we don’t always think of data as some­thing that has a point of view and a per­spec­tive from design onward. And I’m hop­ing that by edu­cat­ing a set of under­grad­u­ates we can cre­ate a more crit­i­cal set of design­ers, users, edu­ca­tors, and those engaged with technology.

I think there’s a num­ber of rea­sons why doing this work real­ly mat­ters for stu­dents. I see this as part of my own engage­ment in social jus­tice con­cerns. I think for stu­dents to actu­al­ly be able to inter­ro­gate issues of pow­er and infor­ma­tion, they need to under­stand and be lit­er­ate in data and think­ing about issues liked the oth­er two pre­sen­ters have already talked about about the bias­es of the tech­nolo­gies they’re engag­ing with. I also think that enhanc­ing their under­stand­ing of the roles of data, infor­ma­tion, and the dig­i­tal more broad­ly and giv­ing them access to a dif­fer­ent set of of dis­ci­pli­nary knowl­edge can inform their intel­lec­tu­al lives, their per­son­al lives, their lives as cit­i­zens in a glob­al­ized world. And think­ing about how such edu­ca­tion might impact their iden­ti­ties and their own reflec­tions on social jus­tice work.

All of this work is aimed at giv­ing them a crit­i­cal vocab­u­lary and per­spec­tive on these con­cerns, intro­duc­ing them to the idea that search engines have bias­es. They all use search engines, but most of them have nev­er thought crit­i­cal­ly about them as a tool. So this is a real­ly excit­ing pos­si­bil­i­ty to get them to think crit­i­cal­ly about the struc­tures that are often invis­i­ble in their dai­ly lives.

“Your Nostalgia is Killing Me”, Vincent Chevalier with Ian Bradley-Perrin

Your Nostalgia is Killing Me”, Vincent Chevalier with Ian Bradley-Perrin

I also want to talk very briefly, and we can talk more about this in the Q&A, about my own project. This is my third year in the depart­ment so I am devel­op­ing my dis­ser­ta­tion project this year, which is very ten­ta­tive­ly titled Your Nostalgia is Killing Me.” This project takes its title from the poster you see here, which is by two activist artists, Vincent Chevalier and Ian Bradley-Perrin. In the set­ting for this poster, it’s designed to look like a teenage bed­room; you see the bed there in the cen­ter. And the images are of course those of AIDS cul­tur­al pro­duc­tions from the 1980s and 1990s. You’ll see out the win­dow there’s an ACT UP polit­i­cal funer­al. Closer to us on the left there’s some oth­er ACT UP images. You’ll notice the Keith Haring draw­ing on the oth­er wall, just as a few exam­ples. And there is of course on the oth­er side Justin Bieber wear­ing, inex­plic­a­bly, an ACT UP t‑shirt, and images of cor­po­rate cam­paigns for AIDS activism.

Through the emblem­at­ic sig­ni­fiers, the artists assert that the nos­tal­gic focus on AIDS of the past result in an impor­tant neglect of the con­tem­po­rary nature of the AIDS cri­sis and there­fore pre­vents crit­i­cal life-saving actions from being ini­ti­at­ed and put into place. My project I should note is cen­tered in crit­i­cal archival stud­ies. This poster [was] put up in three dif­fer­ent cities, and then put up online and gen­er­at­ed a lot of dis­cus­sion, a lot of inter­gen­er­a­tional dis­cus­sion, par­tic­u­lar­ly amongst those inter­est­ed in AIDS activism and art. Those con­ver­sa­tions extend­ed into the archive and of course some of these images, though obtained through Google, are archival images.

So I’m inter­est­ed in how in the three decades since AIDS was first iden­ti­fied and entered the realm of pub­lic dis­course, how it’s become far more than a bio­med­ical event. The HIV/AIDS cri­sis, as I see it, is a fun­da­men­tal­ly cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­non as well. It has gen­er­at­ed a vast body of rep­re­sen­ta­tion, even greater col­lec­tion of expe­ri­ences, affects, knowl­edge, and cul­tur­al activism. And an impor­tant part of that cur­rent cul­tur­al activism, it could be argued, is the imper­a­tive to build an archive of AIDS knowl­edge that would oth­er­wise be neglect­ed, mar­gin­al­ized, sup­pressed, or forgotten. 

And so as a result, I’m going to be look­ing at just a cou­ple of the archival projects that have been devel­oped glob­al­ly to col­lect, pre­serve, and make acces­si­ble polit­i­cal, artis­tic, and med­ical knowl­edge. So I’m deeply inter­est­ed an engaged in the issues of how archives can cap­ture or relate to human expe­ri­ences that are dif­fi­cult to doc­u­ment, whether those are embod­ied expe­ri­ences or feel­ings. So for me, this project will be about what the work of nos­tal­gia does or does­n’t do and how it shaped the expe­ri­ences, under­stand­ings, com­mod­i­fi­ca­tion, and mem­o­ry of HIV/AIDS through the archives and its activist move­ments. So I’m hap­py to talk more about that project dur­ing Q&A, but I want­ed to bring togeth­er those two ends.

Thank you.

Further Reference

Later, there were a pan­el dis­cus­sion and Q&A ses­sion.

Biased Data: A Panel Discussion on Intersectionality and Internet Ethics at the Processing Foundation web site.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.