Aengus Anderson This is The Conversation, a project by Aengus Anderson and Micah Saul.

Micah Saul: Oh my God, we are swamped right now.

Anderson Yeah, we are swamped. We had these starry‐eyed notions of being able to turn two of these things around a week. That’s just not real­is­tic. I wrote a blog post about that, if you’re curi­ous to read more of the sort of logis­ti­cal stuff. But the long and short is I spend a lot of time edit­ing and a lot of time trav­el­ing, and I just don’t have enough time to edit. So, we’ve got five inter­views stacked up in front of us now. By the time, hon­est­ly, I get the next one post­ed, which is going to be Laura Musikanski from The Happiness Initiative, we’ll prob­a­bly be sev­en or eight deep in inter­views.

So we’ve been talk­ing a lit­tle bit about this, about how the hell do we address this prob­lem, and we only have one solu­tion.

Saul: This project needs to take longer than we orig­i­nal­ly intend­ed. We need to sort of increase the time frame. Aengus was plan­ning on being in New York by September. At this point, it’s look­ing like ear­ly October is the ear­li­est that’s pos­si­bly going to hap­pen.

Anderson Basically, we do need to sort of slow down the pace. Realistically I can prob­a­bly edit about one of these a week. And to real­ly get all the voic­es that we want in the project, we’ve already cut out so many that we want. People who’d just incred­i­ble and who have agreed to talk to us. So the only way to do that is with more time.

That aside, we have been hav­ing a dis­cus­sion amongst our­selves about elit­ism and to the sort of voic­es that we’re hear­ing in a project like this. And one of the tricks of talk­ing to peo­ple about the future is that often you get peo­ple who have a lot of time to think about the future. And there is sort of a class back­ground that enables that, and Cameron Whitten point­ed that out.

Saul: I was gonna say I think Cameron Whitten said it best. He was the first per­son to real­ly bring class into the con­ver­sa­tion, and he did it in a way that just… I don’t know, kin­da punched me in the face. The peo­ple we’re talk­ing to are doing pret­ty okay. And so that real­ly did raise the ques­tion like, is this an elit­ist project? Are we…are the peo­ple we are talk­ing to fun­da­men­tal­ly removed from the trou­bles of the nor­mal per­son in such a way that actu­al­ly what they’re say­ing can’t even talk to them?

Anderson It’s also some­thing where we won­der about our research bias, right? We find a lot of these peo­ple through rec­om­men­da­tions. We ask every per­son we know who is a spe­cial­ist in some kind of field to rec­om­mend peo­ple. We also spent a lot of time dig­ging around online. But in both of those cas­es we tend to find peo­ple who are pret­ty vis­i­ble. And often the peo­ple who are pret­ty vis­i­ble are pret­ty afflu­ent. I don’t know where we find amaz­ing thinkers who you can’t learn about online. Or who aren’t pub­lished.

Saul: Certain peo­ple we’ve had con­ver­sa­tions with so far through the project would actu­al­ly be crit­i­ciz­ing us on the bias inher­ent in our overuse of tech­nol­o­gy for for this research.

Anderson This is where I’m going to plead the John Zerzan and say, you know what we just can’t opt out.

Saul: Right. Let’s give an exam­ple. I mean, we real­ly want­ed to find more peo­ple in the cen­ter of the coun­try. We real­ly want­ed to find peo­ple out­side of the cities. We didn’t real­ly know how to do that. You’ve got the coastal poles, with a few excep­tions, big cities in the cen­ter of the coun­try, the North cen­ter of the coun­try. There’s only a few peo­ple we’ve found out­side of the cities.

Anderson Actually, I think this ties back into the thing we start­ed our episode here with. As the project has gone along, we’ve learned about more peo­ple in the mid­dle. We’ve learned about more peo­ple who are in small­er places. And now we almost need to extend the length of the project so I can cir­cle back and get them.

Saul: Right.

Anderson But there are some oth­er things to think about when we’re think­ing about elit­ism. One is, do we have enough inter­ac­tion between lis­ten­ers and inter­vie­wees?

Saul: No.

Anderson No. We don’t. And we feel bad about that. It makes us real­ly sad. Because look, we don’t want to be elit­ist, right. It’s real­ly easy to have a pas­sive radio project, and if you think about The Conversation as a radio project, it’s prob­a­bly a lot eas­i­er to just sort of tune into the pod­cast feed go, Oh, these are inter­est­ing ideas being put out there. That’s an enter­tain­ing episode. Or Aengus is real­ly incom­pe­tent, I wish he’d stop ask­ing ques­tions like that.” But, we real­ly want you to talk back. Not in a sort of chat room way, but in a real like, write to us. Write to the inter­vie­wees. I will car­ry those com­ments into the actu­al con­ver­sa­tions.

Anderson If that doesn’t hap­pen, then ulti­mate­ly we’re just giv­ing these peo­ple a plat­form, which is what we didn’t want to do. I mean, it’s cool to give them a plat­form, but it’s a lot cool­er to not have a plat­form and just have them sit­ting across from you at a table.

Saul: Exactly. This is sup­pose to be a con­ver­sa­tion. The pub­lished thinkers, they’re not the only ones in con­trol of our future. We all are. Until we are all in con­ver­sa­tion, this project is not doing what we think it should. We need to fig­ure out a way to get more peo­ple involved online.

Anderson And we know you’re out there.

Saul: We do. I think we just want to throw some ques­tions at you. Is this an elit­ist project? If it is, how do we change that? What are we doing right, what are we doing wrong? This is the best time now for you to real­ly cri­tique us on the struc­ture. Or on our hypothe­ses in gen­er­al. Let us know. We want to hear this.

Anderson The project’s devel­oped enough now that I think we we can see it falling into a cer­tain rhythm. We know more less how some of it’s going to sound, but there’s still a lot of wig­gle room. We’ve got a lot of inter­views lined up. But if we make the project longer, then we still have the abil­i­ty to bring in a lot of new ideas.

One thing I’m espe­cial­ly curi­ous about is what themes would you want to see us pur­sue more? We got a com­ment ear­li­er today men­tion­ing adver­tis­ing. Advertising and media are ones that we’ve…I mean, they’ve bare­ly come up even with­in the inter­views we’ve had thus far. We’re going to do some con­ver­sa­tions com­ing up which will focus sole­ly on media. Gender is some­thing that hasn’t come up at all. Race, in a seri­ous way, has not come up at all.

Saul: Class only recent­ly reared its head, and I think there’s a hell of a lot more to talk about there.

Anderson Yes. And because now we’re sort of clair­voy­ant, we can see five episodes down the road that you can’t hear yet. Class is going to come up in a real­ly big way in the next two.

Saul: But what voic­es have we just not noticed yet? We can’t have a demo­c­ra­t­ic process when it’s just the two of us.

Anderson But you know, we are here to ques­tion fun­da­men­tal assump­tions, so I think democ­ra­cy is some­thing that we may have to ques­tion.

Saul: Sure.

Anderson Maybe we should just be telling peo­ple about the future and they should be pas­sive­ly lis­ten­ing to our genius.

Saul: See, that would work if either of us were genius­es.

Anderson Oh, shit. We would real­ly pre­fer it didn’t hap­pen like that. So write to us. And you know what, with­out let’s just shut up because we’ve been talk­ing way too long.

Saul: That sounds good.

Further Reference

This interview at the Conversation web site, with project notes, comments, and taxonomic organization specific to The Conversation.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.