Hi, I’m Caelyn Sandel. I’m here to talk to you about diary games. Those of you who were actu­al­ly amaz­ing enough to be at my Women in Games talk in August [2014], this is effec­tive­ly a refined and focused ver­sion of that talk. It’s a lot more focused on how diary games have been help­ful to mar­gin­al­ized pop­u­la­tions and the larg­er cul­tur­al reac­tion. That larg­er cul­tur­al reac­tion has much more come into focus late­ly and I need to, for con­text, open this talk up with a sto­ry that some of you are already extreme­ly sick of, which is that a dev came under fire for hav­ing a suc­cess­ful free game recent­ly. The back­lash was so bad that a sort of minor move­ment based on harass­ment formed around the issue. And all of this came from, effec­tive­ly, a sto­ry designed and pub­lished to help people. 

Depression Quest released on February 14 of 2013 by Zoe Quinn, Patrick Lindsay, and com­pos­er Isaac Schenkler. I got to go to Zoe Quinn’s talk about that game at Women in Games short­ly after it came out, and it meant a lot to me as a per­son who has gone through depres­sion, who was very near­ly effec­tive­ly ground­ed by it. I felt heard, I felt as though some­one was rais­ing aware­ness. It meant a lot and I would say it went a long way toward help­ing me to focus on this kind of per­son­al nar­ra­tive in video games. So obvi­ous­ly it was a bit shock­ing and dis­may­ing to me when the announce­ment of Depression Quest com­ing out on Steam after it had got­ten green­light­ed result­ed in a tremen­dous amount of focused harassment. 

And, you know, why? Why did this hap­pen? Why were peo­ple accus­ing some­one of being uneth­i­cal to pro­mote their free game? I’m going to go into that a lit­tle bit because Depression Quest isn’t just a sto­ry game. Story games have been around for a long time, even the ones that just tell a sto­ry through text. Some of the first video games that used text at all were pars­er inter­ac­tive fic­tion games like Colossal Cave and Zork. But late­ly a sort of sub-genre of text games espe­cial­ly has come up, and I tend to refer to them as diary games.” It’s a term that’s kind of gen­er­al. It does­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly per­fect­ly address all of the games that deal with per­son­al nar­ra­tive or feel­ing, but it’s pithy, and it’s eas­i­ly rec­og­niz­able, and in some cas­es it’s quite accu­rate. I think of a diary game basi­cal­ly as an inter­ac­tive work whose intent is to do one or more of the following:

  • To por­tray a per­son­al expe­ri­ence, or a fic­tion­al­ized alter­na­tive ver­sion of a per­son­al experience.
  • To express inter­nal emo­tion in a fash­ion that isn’t afford­ed by sta­t­ic prose, and I’ll go more into that in a bit.
  • To edu­cate play­ers about a top­ic that isn’t typ­i­cal­ly cov­ered by media.
  • And also to pro­vide cathar­sis or relief for the author, some­times pri­mar­i­ly. My last talk actu­al­ly focused on the idea that the author was effec­tive­ly the pri­ma­ry audi­ence for a per­son­al nar­ra­tive game, and every­one else is the sec­ondary audi­ence. They get to come along with the pri­ma­ry per­son expe­ri­enc­ing the work.

But the focus of this talk in par­tic­u­lar is the way that diary games are impor­tant to mar­gin­al­ized pop­u­la­tions, espe­cial­ly mar­gin­al­ized gen­der iden­ti­ty, sexuality…queer peo­ple, basi­cal­ly. Because why this? Why now? why is this becom­ing so pop­u­lar? Other than the fact that Anna Anthropy intro­duced a ton of peo­ple to the Twine tool for cre­at­ing this kind of stuff. 

I have some ideas about that. I don’t have research to back this up. But when I was a kid pro­gram­ming your own games required learn­ing a pro­gram­ming lan­guage, which required edu­ca­tion or books, and a par­tic­u­lar kind of focus. Without resources, you could­n’t use the tools. I have this real­ly sad mem­o­ry of my par­ents try­ing to let me get into cod­ing by let­ting me try to enter this BASIC code that was in one of my kids’ mag­a­zines, maybe a 321 Contact, some­thing like that. They had a lit­tle code sec­tion. And my par­ents had no idea how you made that stuff into a pro­gram and nei­ther did I.

So I remem­ber typ­ing that code into a shell screen on our Apple IIe. Obviously it did­n’t do any­thing because I did­n’t have the resources. I did­n’t have access to the class­es. But late­ly there are more and more tools that are help­ful to peo­ple to get into this, to get their start. A lot of peo­ple who could get into real­ly intense pro­gram­ming would­n’t oth­er­wise be able to do it if not for tools like Twine, Inform 7, AGS, Ren’Py, GameMaker, Construct. The new tools that are avail­able, usu­al­ly start­ing at no cost what­so­ev­er, and ramp­ing up to be much more pow­er­ful, and allow­ing you to learn more about script­ing, which then can go into pro­gram­ming if you choose to make it do so. Effectively, the bar for entry has been low­ered, and that means that peo­ple who would­n’t oth­er­wise have been able to have a voice, just because they did­n’t have access to the same oppor­tu­ni­ties, are get­ting that opportunity. 

In addi­tion, small-form crowd­fund­ing (imper­fect as it is) is a way that peo­ple can afford to do things that they would­n’t oth­er­wise have been able to. I recent­ly fin­ished host­ing a game jam called Ruin Jam in response to Gamergate, effec­tive­ly. I pitched it before Gamergate hap­pened but it’s a kind of pack­aged sum­ma­ry of the things that I was object­ing to, which is we’ve been accused of ruin­ing video games. So as Arden point­ed out, let’s do it. Let’s ruin them. So, I had a game jam where every­body who has been, is being, or plans to be accused of ruin­ing games can do it and show off their game. Submissions closed yes­ter­day. We had 81 sub­mis­sions, which is incred­i­ble. Such a huge, amaz­ing response. And let me tell you, Ruin Jam absolute­ly would not have hap­pened if I had­n’t been able to sub­si­dize my work for it through Patreon. I just would­n’t have had the time, because I would’ve been spend­ing time on my bor­ing third job that brings in the bills.

So because of these increased tools and increased vis­i­bil­i­ty of those tools, it means that peo­ple who want to put some­thing out about them­selves in an inter­ac­tive fic­tion for­mat, whether that be a tra­di­tion­al video game” or a text game, or a choose-your-own-adventure, any of those, they can now. 

Diary games aren’t gen­er­al­ly fun. This is part of why in a com­mer­cial mar­ket, you’re not nec­es­sar­i­ly going to see them. In fact, they’re very rarely fun at all. Some are. But usu­al­ly that’s because of a per­son get­ting into it, get­ting into the mechan­ics, etc. But many are active­ly unpleas­ant to play, even some of the more fun ones. And even those that are writ­ten for the ben­e­fit of the author are rarely fun to write. They can be cathar­tic. They can be ther­a­peu­tic. But per­son­al nar­ra­tive games are often dif­fi­cult on some level. 

Now, just to put it out there, these games are not always non-fiction. They’re not always auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal. They don’t always have the author, but they can and they often do. Or they will some­times have a stand-in. Depression Quest is a great exam­ple. There are no real peo­ple in Depression Quest. I’ve released two diary games. I want to use those to draw a con­trast. The first one that I released is called Cis Gaze. It is a lin­ear Twine game using text effects to dif­fer­en­ti­ate between my con­scious thoughts and my intru­sive thoughts, and it’s to date prob­a­bly my most-played Twine game ever at some­thing like 3000 plays on philome​.la, which was absolute­ly unex­pect­ed. I wrote it for myself. There’s one choice you get to make in the whole game: Coke or gin­ger ale. And the choice is ulti­mate­ly mean­ing­less because you want both of them. It’s just which one do you get first. And effec­tive­ly it was like, I had this expe­ri­ence where some­body stared at me and noth­ing else hap­pened, and then my brain ate itself. And I want­ed to get that out to peo­ple, and I want­ed to process it myself, and this game is how I did that. So I wrote that. That’s one kind of diary game.

On a total­ly dif­fer­ent spec­trum, my game for Ruin Jam is called Vivant Ludi which stands for long live games” and it stars a trans game dev like me, but who bears a strik­ing resem­blance to 4chan /v/‘s new mas­cot Vivian James but her name is Vivian Grimes, so it’s total­ly dif­fer­ent. It’s basi­cal­ly a self-care sim­u­la­tor, and that game is not my per­son­al expe­ri­ence. It is an aggre­gate of my per­son­al expe­ri­ence and the expe­ri­ences told to me and that I have read about through sev­er­al years now of being a fem­i­nist games person.

So per­son­al nar­ra­tive games can run this gamut, but both of them are about say­ing some­thing effec­tive­ly about the con­di­tion of the self, or a com­mu­ni­ty, or human­i­ty. And that is real­ly what the heart of the per­son­al nar­ra­tive game is, say­ing some­thing about your­self or the world around you. 

A lot of them are not very inter­ac­tive. Arielle Grimes (after whom I named my char­ac­ter) wrote a game for Ruin Jam called BrokenFolx. It’s gor­geous and very dif­fi­cult to look at, and watch­ing peo­ple react to it was amaz­ing. There’s vir­tu­al­ly no actu­al inter­ac­tion in the game. It pro­vides inter­ac­tion as the sole means to effec­tive­ly bring you into it. You advance things, you also choose the order in which you see the lit­tle chap­ters of it. It’s not going to be for every­body, but no diary game or per­son­al nar­ra­tive game is, really. 

Content warn­ing: a lot of these games con­tain objec­tion­able con­tent because peo­ple are talk­ing about things that’ve hap­pened to them. So expect ableism, trans­pho­bia, homo­pho­bia. Most peo­ple are good about the con­tent warn­ings for their games, but fore­warned is fore­armed. But in the end, Arielle takes this and pro­vides a pos­i­tive mes­sage, and the mes­sage is it’s not you that bro­ken. Everybody feels bro­ken. Especially peo­ple who are queer or dis­abled or oth­er­wise mar­gin­al­ized. It’s that we have inter­nal­ized these val­ues that make us feel bro­ken. And peo­ple got those mes­sages and were just telling her how they were cry­ing, how deeply the game touched them. And this game takes five min­utes to play through. So when you write some­thing like this, it can reach peo­ple in ways that you don’t expect.

But there’s anoth­er side to writ­ing diary games, and this is one thing that I did­n’t go into as much in my pre­vi­ous talk. And that is that there is, some­times, when a diary game or a per­son­al nar­ra­tive game gets large enough, back­lash. So why do gamers hate diary games? And when I say gamers” I mean peo­ple who real­ly iden­ti­fy with that term, peo­ple who cen­ter their iden­ti­ty around the play­ing of games, around the con­sump­tion of games. And to answer that, I’m going to quote Leigh Alexander in her fake review for GTA V, Games are about feel­ing pow­er­ful, about you get­ting your way.” The line is said in sar­casm, obvi­ous­ly. Go look up the song ver­sion of that review, it’s very fun­ny. She did a live read­ing of it, and then some­body else com­posed a song out of it.

Gamers with priv­i­lege or inter­nal­ized big­otry (it can kind of be like you can find peo­ple who are in mar­gin­al­ized pop­u­la­tions but very much inter­nal­ize the idea that say, social jus­tice has no place in games) they tend to think of video games as value-neutral enter­tain­ment. They have to offer a sense of free­dom and pow­er to all play­ers, at least priv­i­leged ones. And AAA moral­i­ty, which is how I refer to the moral­i­ty sys­tems built into AAA games that give you that kind of free­dom, it’s not nuanced. Goodness is objec­tive in AAA games, and moral choic­es are very clear. You’ll notice that real life does not match that, but that kind of leads to the following.

Personal nar­ra­tive and diary games don’t allow you that com­fort. They don’t let you have a sim­ple moral­i­ty, they don’t let you feel com­fort­able. In fact that’s cru­cial to a lot of diary games. The Porpentine’s very brief game which she lit­er­al­ly ceased dis­tri­b­u­tion and destroyed, Everything you swal­low will one day come up like a stone, lit­er­al­ly accus­es the play­er of being com­plic­it in abuse and sui­cides. Not a light play. People still have archives of this game if you want to check it out, but not a light play. It uses its mechan­ics to make you feel alter­nate­ly bored, trapped, and help­less, and that’s the point. Anna Anthropy’s Dys4ia uses frus­trat­ing or unwinnable mini-games to instill a sense of frus­tra­tion, and Anna actu­al­ly lit­er­al­ly called that out in sev­er­al inter­views about being an impor­tant part of why it’s a game and not any oth­er kind of media. Because by using those game mechan­ics, she imparts the sense of frus­tra­tion of going on med­ical tran­si­tion to the per­son play­ing the game. Dys4ia, by the way, is prob­a­bly one of my favorite diary games, because of its unique use of graph­ics and sound, and con­trol schemes. Please check it out.

Many diary games need to com­mu­ni­cate unpleas­ant emo­tions to the play­er in order to cre­ate a sense of rap­port or a teach­ing moment, and a gamer who is just here to have fun does­n’t want to be part of this expe­ri­ence. Now you could say, Why don’t they just not play it?” The prob­lem is just know­ing it’s there is point­ing out their per­spec­tive, and that’s a prob­lem. Because a priv­i­leged gamer does­n’t want to be aware of their priv­i­lege, or their com­plic­i­ty in oppres­sive struc­tures, espe­cial­ly in an envi­ron­ment that they con­sid­er neu­tral. They don’t con­sid­er their neu­tral­i­ty polit­i­cal. They don’t want to be told that their neu­tral­i­ty is polit­i­cal. And that it’s not neu­tral. And it bears men­tion­ing a lot of these peo­ple who lash out are hurt­ing. They may have suf­fered bul­ly­ing when they were young, and they may be unhap­py or depressed. They may play video games to effec­tive­ly immerse them­selves in a world that they don’t hate. That’s fair, and diary games do deal blows to that fan­ta­sy. But it does mean that a lot them become des­per­ate and respond with harassment. 

One of the threads that I’ve seen in this Gamergate thing is that they simul­ta­ne­ous­ly think of them­selves as plucky under­dogs and an unstop­pable force. And if you stop and think about that, the cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance required to get there is impres­sive. They think of them­selves as pow­er­ful enough to strip exist­ing games jour­nal­ism of its adver­tis­ers, but they’re the plucky under­dogs, they are the lit­tle guys. And that’s just…there’s a win­dow there. I may not be qual­i­fied to actu­al­ly say what that win­dow sees into, but it’s a window. 

So they want to silence this, they don’t want to hear about it. They say, Get out of my space” effec­tive­ly. But as tools improve, they can’t actu­al­ly get rid of these nar­ra­tives. As tools improve, remov­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for the mar­gin­al­ized is no longer enough to silence them. So they abuse peo­ple until they leave, and some­times it works. Which is trou­bling, espe­cial­ly because then some peo­ple will turn to the peo­ple leav­ing and say, You can’t do this. If you do this, they win.” Which is a hard thing to do to some­body who is leav­ing some­thing because they’ve been harassed. So you end up with this sit­u­a­tion where the best thing for this per­son to do is to leave, and they do.

But there are advan­tages to this, and I don’t want to end on a down­er because I don’t think that the devel­op­ment and rise of diary games is a road to harass­ment. I don’t think that’s the case. You might be think­ing at this point, If I make a diary game, are they going to come after me? Are they going to come to get me?” That’s fair. It’s not beyond the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ty. But it’s not like­ly. The thing about it is that as more and more diary games appear, com­mu­ni­ties that focus on them form. Circles of peo­ple that talk about them form. And the fact of the mat­ter is that if you are not open­ly vocal, like on social media, it’s far less like­ly that any­one with ill intent is going to get their hands on your game in the first place. You can con­trol the audi­ence to which your work is exposed, to a cer­tain degree. And the rhetoric around your work can help guide that. I’m pur­pose­ful­ly a rabble-rouser, so I get nasty atten­tion from time to time. But even then, if you’ve got under a thou­sand Twitter fol­low­ers, the like­li­hood that you’re going to be tar­get­ed is low because you’re not an attack­able oppor­tu­ni­ty. You are not a mile­stone to be over­come, and real talk, these peo­ple do think of it as a game. 

But there’s a lot of good here because diary games are pro­lif­er­at­ing. They can’t be stamped out. There are too many of them, there are too many tools to cre­ate them. It’s becom­ing more and more of a thing. Also one thing that’s great for allies in this case is that diary games pro­vide an oppor­tu­ni­ty to boost the voic­es of the mar­gin­al­ized in their own words and images, with­out speak­ing over them. If some­body wants their work out there, you can boost it and peo­ple will expe­ri­ence exact­ly what they said. Visibility empow­ers and encour­ages new authors. 

And Ruin Jam was a suc­cess. I’m going to do it again next year, and I’m sure this is not the only kind of jam that’s pro­mot­ing this kind of game. So keep your eyes open. There’ll be more stuff like this. There’ll be jams specif­i­cal­ly for this kind of game. If nobody else makes them, I will. If I don’t, you will. So keep writ­ing, keep pro­duc­ing. Anyone can do this, and I think that’s amazing. 

Thank you very much.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.