So now we’re going to think about heat. And we’re going to think about all the lit­tle devices that we use. Microprocessors in our phones. About industrial-scale process­es. Steel pro­cess­ing, oil refin­ing. About trans­port, so planes, trains, and auto­mo­biles. And the heat that’s gen­er­at­ed in those process­es. You’ve all had a hot phone, I’m sure.

Machines gen­er­ate waste heat when they do work for us. And this year, sev­en bil­lion of us will use twenty-five tril­lion kilo­watt hours of elec­tric­i­ty. An awful lot of that will end up as waste heat. So, we treat waste heat as a prob­lem. We see it as a chal­lenge to design how we can man­age it. We don’t think of it as a resource. If we thought of it as a resource, that would be results we are just throw­ing away.

But it’s worse than that. We’re not just wast­ing heat, we’re using even extra ener­gy try­ing to man­age that heat. So extra sys­tems on air­craft, for exam­ple, to keep the sys­tem cool. At the oth­er end of our ther­mal spec­trum, refrig­er­a­tion and air con­di­tion­ing is now using some­thing like 15% of our glob­al elec­tric­i­ty pro­duc­tion.

So here we are in the 21st cen­tu­ry. Wouldn’t it be great if we could do some­thing bet­ter? If we could use that heat to extract elec­tric­i­ty. Or if we could use elec­tric­i­ty more effi­cient­ly. Cool sys­tems, sys­tems we could just embed­ded into every­day objects, that would allow us to have elec­tric­i­ty back to pow­er sys­tems.

So, why aren’t we doing that? Well, there are a few prob­lems. But real­ly they’re both two sides of the same coin. How can we use heat to extract elec­tric­i­ty? How can we use elec­tric­i­ty to extract cool­ing? They’re about mate­r­i­al sys­tems that have tran­si­tions in them. And we could start to address some of those prob­lems if we think a bit more clev­er­ly about how we do mate­ri­als engi­neer­ing.

So one of the key chal­lenges is one of chem­istry. How do we get the atom­ic struc­ture of the mate­ri­als we’re using right so that they do effec­tive­ly and effi­cient­ly cou­ple between ther­mal and elec­tri­cal ener­gy? The sec­ond prob­lem is one of struc­ture. How do you get mate­ri­als that can pump effec­tive­ly elec­tric­i­ty or heat in and out of those sys­tems? We’re going to need new mate­ri­als com­bined at the nanoscale to be able to do this.

So when we talk about chem­istry and nanos­truc­ture, we only have to look around us to see lots of exam­ples. Nature does this nat­u­ral­ly. Beautiful, inter­con­nect­ed sys­tems. And we can start to look to biol­o­gy to think about ways to both design and to start to grow new nanoscale nanocom­pos­ite sys­tems.

You might have mul­ti­ple lay­ers of mate­ri­als, just atom­ic lay­ers thick, that behave dif­fer­ent­ly to their com­po­nent struc­tures. Or you might direct­ly mim­ic some­thing bio­log­i­cal like a leaf or a bone. Or in my lab we work on opals to have inter­con­nect­ed, active sys­tems. And once you’ve got that cou­pling of nanos­truc­ture and chem­istry into a new mate­r­i­al, you can start to think about dif­fer­ent appli­ca­tions.

At a sim­ple lev­el, you can think about low pow­er devices. So hav­ing self-powered health mon­i­tor­ing, just from the ambi­ent tem­per­a­ture of your body. Monitoring in remote haz­ardous envi­ron­ments where you don’t want to send peo­ple in. New sys­tems that will allow us bet­ter con­nec­tiv­i­ty and bet­ter infor­ma­tion gath­er­ing.

Our trans­port sys­tems will use less fuel, and that means less emis­sions. And We can start to think about con­nect­ing our sys­tems so that the heat from the engine is then recap­tured and used to pow­er say, the air con­di­tion­ing units in urban trans­port net­works.

In refrigeration—this is a huge topic—you could just swap out con­ven­tion­al devices that have not real­ly changed for about a hun­dred years with magnetically-powered tech­nol­o­gy. They’ll be 50% more effi­cient. Straight way, 50% effi­cien­cy improve­ment. That, on a grid-scale elec­tric­i­ty amount is 3% sup­ply, just from your domes­tic hous­ing. Twelve mega­tons of car­bon diox­ide would be saved with that tech­nol­o­gy.

But just because we’re think­ing about nanoscale mate­ri­als doesn’t mean we shouldn’t think even big­ger. Why don’t we join up all these sys­tems, have ther­mal recap­ture with local renew­ables, local ener­gy stor­age, to have a com­plete­ly off-grid fac­to­ry or data cen­ter. We would reduce resource con­sump­tion, reduce pro­duc­tion costs, reduce envi­ron­men­tal impact.

So we’re already sev­en bil­lion and grow­ing. The demographic’s shift­ing. More and more of us are mov­ing to cities. And those urban envi­ron­ments are lit­er­al­ly hotspots. What if we could think a lit­tle bit more clev­er­ly about heat cap­ture. What if we could start to har­ness some of this ener­gy that’s just being wast­ed?

So, we’re fac­ing a triple chal­lenge in ener­gy: secu­ri­ty, sus­tain­abil­i­ty, and equi­ty. Heat is a huge part of our ener­gy ecosys­tem. If we even start to make small changes, we will have mas­sive impacts on our ener­gy econ­o­my. In the future, these smart nanocom­pos­ites will be embed­ded into every­day devices. They will change the way we think about indus­tri­al and urban design.

But right now, it’s still a wast­ed resource. The tin can you just saw, none of you will be throw­ing that away. You see that as a resource. What can we do to make peo­ple see heat and heat cap­ture as a resource, and make heat cap­ture the new recy­cling?

Further Reference

Faculty page at Imperial College London


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.