It’s real­ly a huge hon­or to be here amongst all of these real­ly incred­i­ble ideas and amaz­ing peo­ple, so thank you very much to to PopTech. What I want to talk to you about today are two things, behav­ioral con­ta­gions, and causality. 

And the rea­son that I am inter­est­ed in behav­ioral con­ta­gions is that I firm­ly believe that if we can under­stand how behav­iors spread in a social net­work and thus in a pop­u­la­tion from per­son to per­son to per­son to per­son, that we could poten­tial­ly pro­mote behav­iors like these, con­dom use, or tolerance.

And then we can also poten­tial­ly con­tain behav­iors like like these, smok­ing or dirty nee­dle sharing. 

So, what I do is I mine mas­sive social net­work data to under­stand how behav­ioral con­ta­gions spread in human social net­works, how peers influ­ence one anoth­er to do things like quit smok­ing or buy a cer­tain prod­uct or vote for a dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal can­di­date. And I focus on strate­gies, incen­tive strate­gies, to cre­ate cas­cades of behav­ior through a pop­u­la­tion. And one of the most impor­tant keys to all of these endeav­ors is causal sta­tis­ti­cal estimation. 

So, I have this car­toon on my door at my office. It’s two friends talk­ing, and one friend says to the oth­er, I used to think cor­re­la­tion implied cau­sa­tion. Then I took a sta­tis­tics class and now I don’t.” And the friend says, It sounds like the class helped.” And the guy goes, Well, maybe.”

And the idea is that maybe this guy has a pro­cliv­i­ty to under­stand sta­tis­tics and so select­ed into the class, and that this cor­re­la­tion between tak­ing the class and under­stand­ing this dif­fer­ence isn’t causal. The class isn’t teach­ing him about sta­tis­tics at all.

And in net­work sci­ence this is known as the reflec­tion prob­lem. Human behav­iors tend to clus­ter in net­work space and in time. We have abun­dant evi­dence on this now. But is this because of peer influ­ence, or alter­na­tive explanations?

Let me give you an exam­ple. James Fowler came and gave a talk here last year about his study on obe­si­ty being con­ta­gious with Nicholas Christakis. This is a great study that shows basi­cal­ly that Body Mass Index increas­es are cor­re­lat­ed over time amongst friends. And this was picked up by the col­lec­tive uncon­scious and by the media, and you got news sto­ries like this one that said are your friends mak­ing you fat?” And so, the basic idea here is that there could be alter­na­tive expla­na­tions for this. Like for exam­ple, birds of a feath­er may flock togeth­er. We may choose friends who are more like our­selves and thus cre­ate cor­re­la­tions in the behav­iors amongst peo­ple that are con­nect­ed in a social network. 

And this is a long line of the­o­ry. This quote was orig­i­nal­ly attrib­uted to Robert Burton in the 1500s. But it’s even old­er than that, because before Robert Burton it was Aristotle that was say­ing that peo­ple love those who are like them­selves. And before that it was Plato who said that sim­i­lar­i­ty begets friend­ship. And just to prove that it was a long line of wor­thy schol­ars who said this argu­ment, my mom said to me, Hanging out with a bad crowd will get you into trou­ble.” She was none too pleased when I told her that she might might have got­ten the causal struc­ture of that argu­ment wrong.

And so Slate ran an arti­cle that was titled Everything Is Contagious” [part 2]. It’s not just about obe­si­ty. Apparently hap­pi­ness is con­ta­gious, and prod­uct of option is con­ta­gious, and coop­er­a­tion is con­ta­gious, and lone­li­ness is con­ta­gious.

But it’s also not just about birds of a feath­er. There are many alter­na­tive expla­na­tions they can explain these cor­re­la­tions. Like, friends might be exposed to the same exter­nal stim­uli, or have a greater prob­a­bil­i­ty. This is impor­tant for two rea­sons, because the causal struc­ture of the under­ly­ing dynam­ic process of the spread implies dif­fer­ent dif­fu­sion prop­er­ties for the behav­ior. Where’s it going to go next, so who should we tar­get? And dif­fer­ent opti­mal con­tain­ment and pro­mo­tion poli­cies. How should we design sys­tems that pre­vent or pro­mote these behaviors. 

Let me give you two exam­ples. We stud­ied which types of mes­sages spread a con­ta­gion best. And we stud­ied the dif­fer­ence between per­son­al invi­ta­tions and pas­sive aware­ness. So imag­ine if I gave some peo­ple the oppor­tu­ni­ty to per­son­al­ly invite their friends to PopTech next year, and then I gave oth­er peo­ple in the room the oppor­tu­ni­ty to wear a shirt that said that they went to PopTech last year.

Which of these would be more effec­tive? Well it turns out that as you would expect, the per­son­al invi­ta­tion is more per­sua­sive. More of those peo­ple came to the behav­ior as a result of the per­son­al invi­ta­tion. And in terms of glob­al dif­fu­sion, it near­ly dou­bled the behav­ior in the glob­al net­work for which this per­son­al invi­ta­tion was released. But in fact it was the pas­sive aware­ness that gen­er­at­ed much more glob­al dif­fu­sion, because more peo­ple were exposed to it.

And I’ll leave you with this final result. We did a ran­dom­ized tri­al of sus­cep­ti­bil­i­ty to influ­ence on Facebook amongst two mil­lion peo­ple. And ini­tial results look like this for what your rela­tion­ship sta­tus is; sin­gle, in a rela­tion­ship, engaged, mar­ried, or it’s com­pli­cat­ed. And sin­gle peo­ple are are more sus­cep­ti­ble to influ­ence than those that don’t report their rela­tion­ship sta­tus. If you’re in a rela­tion­ship you’re even more sus­cep­ti­ble to peer influ­ence from your peers. If you’re engaged, you’re even more sus­cep­ti­ble to peer influ­ence. And if you’re mar­ried, you’re not sus­cep­ti­ble at all to peer influ­ence, appar­ent­ly. And if it’s com­pli­cat­ed, you’re the most sus­cep­ti­ble. So my col­leagues and I debate what is going on here. And if you’d like to debate that with me or talk about any of these results, I encour­age you to come talk to me. And more impor­tant­ly, I encour­age you to tell your friends to come talk to me.

Thank you.

Further Reference

This pre­sen­ta­tion at the PopTech site.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.