Stephen Chan: The just rebel­lion. These are two very evoca­tive words, the word just,” the word rebel­lion.” Maybe we can start with a scene drawn from recent his­to­ry, 1927, Shanghai. The Communists attempt their first major upris­ing in one of the great cities of China. It is doomed to fail­ure. It’s going to be crushed. From the crush­ing of the Shanghai upris­ing, Chairman Mao decides that he has to take the strug­gle for a Communist China into the coun­try­side, and the strug­gle of the peas­ants was born, and the recruit­ment of peas­ants into the Red Army began, until final­ly there was a Communist vic­to­ry in 1949.

But one of the often unre­mem­bered or mis­re­mem­bered events of the Shanghai upris­ing was the appear­ance of for­eign fight­ers. Foreign fight­ers who had come to share and to help win a vic­to­ry that could trans­form China. One of the young par­tic­i­pants in the Shanghai upris­ing was the French intel­lec­tu­al André Malraux. He was actu­al­ly the fore­run­ner of of Laura Croft’s Tomb Raider. He was him­self a young archae­o­log­i­cal tomb raider in Cambodia, and loot­ed antiq­ui­ties, took them back to Paris, where some of them are still on show. He lat­er became Minister of Culture in de Gaulle’s gov­ern­ment in France. 

But he as an adven­tur­er came to China, as he lat­er came to Spain to help the Republicans there. But he came and record­ed in a famous nov­el the upris­ing in Shanghai, which was called in English Man’s Estate, some­times also trans­lat­ed a Man’s Fate. And there he inter­ro­gat­ed the psy­cholo­gies of those who rebelled as Chinese, and those who came to help the Chinese rebel. It was as it were a nov­el of the mul­ti­cul­tur­al foun­da­tions of rebellion.

And I start with that book to depict the psy­cholo­gies of what it means to be a rebel against impos­si­ble odds. The whole idea of why you do it. Is there a com­mon­al­i­ty of rea­sons for why you rise up? The idea of what is just can be very much inter­ro­gat­ed from do you mean in terms of jus­tice?” And then who’s con­cep­tion of jus­tice? What philo­soph­i­cal, what eth­i­cal back­ground of jus­tice are you refer­ring to? Or are you talk­ing about justified? What jus­ti­fi­ca­tion leads you to rebel? There are sub­tle and very very dis­tinct dif­fer­ences between those two terms. And so the course on the polit­i­cal thought of the just rebel­lion has to inter­ro­gate the dif­fer­ences, the dif­fer­ent mean­ings, of those two terms, and how eas­i­ly we use one when in fact we are refer­ring to the other.

And what do you mean by rebel­lion? Again, in the course we draw dis­tinc­tions between what is a revolt on the one hand, and what is a rev­o­lu­tion on the oth­er hand, and where rebel­lion sits as a mid­point which is often a very very uneasy mid­point. What kind of pro­gram is pos­si­ble in a rebel­lion if it’s not to become a fully-fledged rev­o­lu­tion, for instance?

So all of these terms have got to be ques­tioned and put into soci­o­log­i­cal and to polit­i­cal and into his­tor­i­cal con­texts. And there are dif­fer­ent the­o­ries of rebel­lion, par­tic­u­lar­ly as it segues into rev­o­lu­tion. We exam­ine in this course two prin­ci­pal approach­es. Someone like Theda Skocpol, for instance, pro­pos­es a very Neo-Marxist ren­di­tion of when is it right to launch rev­o­lu­tion? What con­di­tions have to be present for a suc­cess­ful rev­o­lu­tion? And she talks very much in Neo-Marxist terms of the mate­r­i­al foun­da­tions for rebel­lion lead­ing to revolution.

Someone like the late Fred Halliday from LSE pro­posed the impor­tance of cul­tur­al foun­da­tions for rebel­lion lead­ing to revolution—you’ve got to believe in some­thing, not sim­ply be deprived of some­thing. Simply to be deprived of mate­r­i­al goods is not enough if there’s not a jus­ti­fy­ing body of thought say­ing, You must now rise up.”

And the whole idea of ris­ing up. In what man­ner may you rise up? For what rea­sons, in the absence of jus­ti­fy­ing thought? And then what is that jus­ti­fy­ing thought? And when you do rise up, in what man­ner may you rise up with­out com­mit­ting atrocities?

Now, what we do in this course is to bor­row from just war the­o­ry, as pro­posed by Augustine, as devel­oped in the Medieval days by Thomas Aquinas, and we apply the jus ad bel­lum, that is jus­tice lead­ing up to war; and jus in bel­lo, that is what means, what tech­niques, what method­olo­gies are you per­mit­ted while you are actu­al­ly fight­ing before you lapse into atroc­i­ty? And we apply those to what it means to be rebel­lious, to con­duct rebel­lion, and how far rebel­lion is launched before it segues into revolution.

Then in the course we take a num­ber of case exam­ples from dif­fer­ent parts of the world. We begin with places such as China, for instance, as I said. But we also look at all kinds of con­di­tions and prob­lem­at­ics to do with for instance the Iranian Revolution. The thought of Ali Shariati, devel­oped in Paris, par­tial­ly as Frantz Fanon’s thought was devel­oped in Paris at the same time, in fact, by close asso­ci­a­tion with French philo­soph­i­cal cir­cles. And the fusions that some­one like Shariati made between Iranian thought and Parisian thought, and how he had tried to apply that fusion to launch a rebel­lion against the Shah’s regime back home, and how that thought was hijacked by a cler­i­cal fac­tion that lat­er became the tri­umphant Ayatollahs of the Iranian Revolution. So we look at that.

We look at rev­o­lu­tion in dif­fer­ent parts of the world. The upris­ing of the Māori peo­ple in New Zealand, for instance. The whole Victorian idea that was enshrined in what they called pen­ny dread­ful novels—the equiv­a­lent of Mills and Boon’s romance nov­els in the Victorian era but these were adven­ture nov­els. The whole idea of the noble sav­age was drawn from the stand of the Māori people.

But not many peo­ple appre­ci­ate the deep under­ly­ing orga­ni­za­tion­al ethos and cul­tur­al ethos of the Māori upris­ing. Only now in New Zealand, with the Māori renais­sance, epit­o­mized in of all things the haka that the All Blacks per­form at rug­by match­es when you watch, over the years of how the haka has now become more full-blooded, and how even the white play­ers try to per­form the haka with integri­ty and com­pare that with the desul­to­ry per­for­mances back in the 1950s and 1960s when it was just some­thing to get through. The renais­sance of thought and cul­tur­al prac­tice, the reimag­i­na­tion and new under­stand­ing of why there was rebel­lion in New Zealand, and the ideas and the con­duct of chival­ry, as we might call it, that were very very present in that rebel­lion, those are also dis­cussed in the course.

As are the mag­i­cal upris­ings of the box­ers, the kung-fu fight­ers in China at the ear­ly part of the 20th. cen­tu­ry. Magical upris­ings that have tak­en place even recent­ly in Africa. Alice Lakwena, after the fall of Idi Amin in Uganda, and the far more prob­lem­at­ic mag­i­cal upris­ing of her descen­dant Joseph Koni, with all of the con­tro­ver­sy, mis­un­der­stand­ings, con­dem­na­tions, and still unsuc­cess­ful attempts to bring him to jus­tice, again in a coun­try like Uganda. What lies behind, good or bad, these kinds of upris­ings that do not have any appar­ent basis in ratio­nal­i­ty? What is behind dif­fer­ent belief sys­tems that may not in fact be sys­tem­at­ic at all?

So we’re look­ing at all of these things, their con­ti­nu­ities. And the course con­cludes with a case exam­ple which is of course extreme­ly prob­lem­at­ic in today’s terms. What about rebel­lion which might claim to be just, which might claim to be jus­ti­fied, but which is also atro­cious? And in which its claims are based on scrip­ture, on rev­e­la­tion, or cer­tain­ly on the inter­pre­ta­tion of rev­e­la­tion. What about rebel­lion that is jihad? What about the rebel­lion in the inter­na­tion­al sys­tem of the Islamic State? Should it be sim­ply writ­ten off as atro­cious? Which it is. Is it not jus­ti­fied in terms of its con­duct? Is it in any way jus­ti­fied in terms of its ani­ma­tion? Or is there a high­er jus­tice that Western pow­ers do not ful­ly under­stand? The course will close with a very very intrigu­ing, con­tro­ver­sial, and hope­ful­ly thought-provoking excur­sion into fields that right now are sim­ply described as under a black flag.

Further Reference

Course infor­ma­tion

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.