Agriculture has trans­formed the plan­et. We use more than a third of the Earth’s sur­face to grow crops and raise live­stock. About 70% of glob­al water with­drawals are for agri­cul­ture, and our food sys­tems are impli­cat­ed in up to a third of anthro­pogenic green­house gas emis­sions. Each of these dimen­sions of glob­al agri­cul­ture is now being influ­enced by glob­al­iza­tion.

A plate of food containing some meat, a salad, tomato, avocado slices, and an egg

Consider the meal pic­tured here. Depending on where in the world you live, the ingre­di­ents may have been sourced from very far away, includ­ing feed crops such as soy used to pro­duce the meat. In many coun­tries, the very abil­i­ty to eat a food like avo­ca­do is a direct ben­e­fit of inter­na­tion­al trade. We are eat­ing on an inter­con­nect­ed plan­et. Food trade now shapes land use world­wide and is reshap­ing the food sup­plies of many nations.

With this agri­cul­tur­al glob­al­iza­tion, food pro­duc­tion and con­sump­tion are decou­pled, mak­ing it more dif­fi­cult to see cause and effect between our diets and the agri­cul­tur­al land­scapes on which we depend. Growing glob­al demand for cer­tain com­modi­ties is now inter­twined with local issues such as water scarci­ty, pol­lu­tion, and defor­esta­tion.

Photo: Flickr

In par­tic­u­lar, com­mod­i­ty crops such as palm oil and soy have trans­formed land use in a few key coun­tries where glob­al production’s now increas­ing­ly con­cen­trat­ed. What are the broad­er impli­ca­tions of this glob­al­iza­tion in our food sys­tem in terms of food secu­ri­ty and resource sus­tain­abil­i­ty? My lab at McGill University address­es this ques­tion by com­bin­ing glob­al data on trade and food sup­ply sta­tis­tics, with dif­fer­ent types of agri­cul­tur­al land use man­age­ment data.

An illus­tra­tion of this food sys­tems glob­al­iza­tion is shown in this map here, which shows a net­work map depict­ing the glob­al reach of the United Kingdom’s calo­rie sup­ply from import­ed agri­cul­tur­al com­modi­ties. The box­es on the bot­tom show a more detailed break­down, com­par­ing each trade flow with domes­tic pro­duc­tion of dif­fer­ent com­modi­ties. Britain’s par­tic­u­lar­ly glob­al­ized diet links it with a diver­si­ty of farm­ing sys­tems and cli­mates around the world.

We’re also study­ing these calo­rie import net­works over time. These graphs com­pare the sources of Japan’s calo­rie imports, which are con­cen­trat­ed and remain very sta­ble over approx­i­mate­ly two decades, to Saudi Arabia’s which a much more dis­persed across many coun­tries and change dra­mat­i­cal­ly over this time peri­od.

The struc­ture and com­po­si­tion of these food import net­works mod­er­ates link­ages between coun­tries in terms of food and resources. By com­bin­ing these glob­al trade data with data on crop yields, fer­til­iz­er use, and water use, we can inves­ti­gate how trade impacts the dis­tri­b­u­tion of resource use across coun­tries.

What we are find­ing is that some coun­tries are becom­ing increas­ing­ly reliant on for­eign sources of land use under­ly­ing their food con­sump­tion out­sourc­ing. With this, hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple are becom­ing reliant on poten­tial­ly less‐certain sources of food and the resources need­ed to grow it.

This trend is facil­i­tat­ed by oth­er coun­tries becom­ing more export‐oriented in terms of their land use. Many of the coun­tries pic­tured here in dark green use more of their domes­tic crop­lands for export pro­duc­tion than for their own domes­tic food con­sump­tion. Other coun­tries are even more high­ly glob­al­ized, essen­tial­ly exchang­ing their export com­modi­ties for for­eign imports grown on land use abroad.

A shift toward spe­cial­iza­tion and con­cen­tra­tion with glob­al­iza­tion has fueled the emer­gence of dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly large and land‐intensive trade rela­tion­ships, such as pic­tured here for the glob­al soy trade net­work. Just three coun­tries pro­duce and export about 80% of soy glob­al­ly.

Agricultural trade such as this can help to pro­mote gains in aver­age resource use effi­cien­cy in agri­cul­ture, reduc­ing the amount of land, fer­til­iz­er, and water required to pro­duce food calo­ries on a glob­al scale. However, the diver­si­ty of agri­cul­tur­al sys­tems from which these import­ed foods are sourced means that these effi­cien­cy gains are not uni­ver­sal, and may not occur for the same foods in the same coun­tries.

As food con­sumers, we’re also increas­ing­ly urban. This com­pounds the chal­lenges of glob­al­iza­tion in sep­a­rat­ing us from food pro­duc­tion land­scapes. Our next step is to look at these glob­al data through the lens of more local case stud­ies, to ask where glob­al­iza­tion is ben­e­fi­cial and where instead we might strive from a mid­dle ground mod­el of region­al­iza­tion.

Part of nav­i­gat­ing this is remem­ber­ing that glob­al food trade is not just about eco­nom­ics. In study­ing agri­cul­tur­al glob­al­iza­tion, I’ve been learn­ing that we can get a very dif­fer­ent under­stand­ing of the struc­ture and com­po­si­tion of glob­al food trade net­works using mon­e­tary, nutri­tion­al, or resource‐based met­rics.

In the next few decades, it’s pro­ject­ed that demand for food glob­al­ly could increase by 60% or more, like­ly dri­ving even greater sep­a­ra­tion of food pro­duc­tion and con­sump­tion. In this time of change, we should envi­sion what sus­tain­able local and glob­al food sys­tems look like. How best can we all ben­e­fit from the diver­si­ty of agri­cul­ture on our plan­et in a fair, sus­tain­able, and food‐secure way? Thank you.

Further Reference

Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2016 at the World Economic Forum site


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.