I’m Larry Landweber. I’m from the United States. Professor emer­i­tus from the University of Wisconsin in Madison. I got involved with net­work­ing some­time in the late 70s, main­ly because I was look­ing around and dis­cov­er­ing that peo­ple were get­ting into net­work­ing, email. And at the time I was depart­ment chair at University of Wisconsin, the com­put­er sci­ence depart­ment, and was try­ing to under­stand what those capa­bil­i­ties would do for our fac­ul­ty and stu­dents. And so I got inter­est­ed, and as a result of that end­ed up putting in a pro­pos­al to the National Science Foundation to do an email sys­tem for the­o­ret­i­cal com­put­er sci­en­tists in the United States. And quite amaz­ing­ly the National Science Foundation fund­ed it. 

That changed my life. I mean, that was a major inflec­tion point where I decid­ed that I would no longer work as a the­o­reti­cian. I had been prov­ing the­o­rems for prob­a­bly fif­teen or twen­ty years. I was a logi­cian in a com­put­er sci­ence depart­ment. And I got so excit­ed by the net­work­ing that I decid­ed to just aban­don the work in the­o­ry and con­tin­ue.

So as a result of that, I end­ed up putting togeth­er a group of peo­ple in about 1979. And that group worked with me, and we worked with Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf from DARPA, and the peo­ple from NSF, and we put togeth­er a pro­pos­al to build a net­work for all of the research groups in com­put­ing in the United States. Quite a…oh, how should I put it? It was a leap of faith that we did that. And the goal of CSNET was to intro­duce net­work­ing into all of the com­put­er sci­ence depart­ments at uni­ver­si­ties, and also com­put­er research groups in indus­try and gov­ern­ment, through­out the United States.

After about five years, we had brought the entire aca­d­e­mic com­put­er sci­ence com­mu­ni­ty on board. And the National Science Foundation, using CSNET as a mod­el, decid­ed to have a net­work for a wider com­mu­ni­ty. And the result of that was through the rest of the 80s, all of the aca­d­e­mic com­mu­ni­ty in the United States got involved, and that led to the com­mer­cial­iza­tion, which led to the Web, which led to where we are today. And so if I had to say what my proud­est achieve­ment [is,] it’s hav­ing played a role in lay­ing the foun­da­tion for today’s Internet. 

Unlike some of the­se peo­ple who claim they knew what was going to hap­pen, I nev­er real­ly knew what was going to hap­pen. I didn’t real­ize the world had changed until after I saw the World Wide Web. And in fact if the World Wide Web had not hap­pened, we wouldn’t be hav­ing this dis­cus­sion, because the Internet would not have jumped from the aca­d­e­mic com­mu­ni­ty to the real world. Real peo­ple were not going to be turned on by email and file trans­fer. It took the World Wide Web and the the glob­al infor­ma­tion util­i­ty.

My hope is the rais­ing up of bil­lions of peo­ple who live on a dol­lar or two dol­lars a day, and that with the Internet we can have things like being able to check on mar­ket con­di­tions if they’re sub­sis­tence farm­ers who are sell­ing their crops. Or being able to under­stand what their gov­ern­ment is say­ing, real­ly. Or being able to com­mu­ni­cate. I mean, the Arab Spring, for me, was absolute­ly the embod­i­ment of the promise of the Internet.

What I also would like to see, anoth­er hope for the Internet, is that it becomes inte­grat­ed with oth­er dis­ci­plines. And so for exam­ple med­ical dis­ci­plines. I think there are incred­i­ble oppor­tu­ni­ties to use the Internet to bring the ben­e­fits of med­i­cine and state of the art medicine—we already are see­ing robot­ic surgery. We can see that across cities, across rooms. And there are just an amaz­ing num­ber of pos­si­ble appli­ca­tions that we haven’t yet real­ly devel­oped.

The thing that’s so crit­i­cal for peo­ple who are work­ing on the Internet is not to just get involved in the techy stuff but also to under­stand the soci­etal part and the need to move the soci­ety in pos­i­tive ways. And I think that’s some­thing that’s very impor­tant that the Internet Society is work­ing on. I real­ly like the fact that there’s a mix of— At this meet­ing, for exam­ple, a mix of techie types who don’t real­ly ful­ly under­stand the soci­etal issues, and the peo­ple who are soci­ol­o­gists and anthro­pol­o­gists, or authors, who get togeth­er and talk about the­se issues. Because togeth­er they can under­stand and may­be be forces for good. 


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.