Kimberly Claffy: Hi. I regret not being able to be there in per­son to receive this hon­or from the Internet Society, which has been received by many peo­ple I’ve admired for all my pro­fes­sion­al life. Many of them have humbly said in their accep­tance talks over the years that they were lucky to be in the right place at the right time, or lucky to work with so many amaz­ing peo­ple who seem more deserv­ing of the award. I cer­tain­ly share both of these feel­ings myself.

I also admire ISOC for putting all these lit­tle bits of his­to­ry online. So here’s a bit of mine. I went to UC San Diego grad­u­ate school in 1989, think­ing I would study arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence dur­ing what I guess was its sec­ond wave. But UC San Diego host­ed one of the orig­i­nal NSF-funded super­com­put­er cen­ters due to the vision and intense ded­i­ca­tion of Sid Karin its found­ing direc­tor, and the vision­ary role of the National Science Foundation in fund­ing a rev­o­lu­tion,” which is what a National Academies report called the US gov­ern­men­t’s strate­gic sup­port for com­put­ing research in 80s and 90s. And so it did.

It’s hard to find peo­ple out­side Internet his­to­ri­ans who know that the first Internet back­bones were cre­at­ed to con­nect sci­en­tif­ic researchers to high-performance com­put­ing facil­i­ties. I was delight­ed to see Steve Wolff induct­ed into this group in 2013. He described in his speech the exact moment that he and a physics call­ing dis­cov­ered the boon” that net­work­ing would be for sci­en­tif­ic research. Steve was the NSF pro­gram direc­tor who man­aged the also-visionary NSFNET back­bone project in the 80s and 90s, co-led by Hans-Werner Braun. Steve also fund­ed my PhD research, with Hans-Werner advis­ing me along with a ter­rif­ic set of fac­ul­ty from UC San Diego, includ­ing Sid Karin and my fac­ul­ty advis­er George Polyzos, who was him­self a second-generation stu­dent of anoth­er Hall of Fame inductee, Leonard Kleinrock.

So with all of this sup­port, I was able to do the first, and I feared the last, sci­en­tif­ic study on a pub­lic Internet back­bone, rely­ing on traf­fic, topol­o­gy, and per­for­mance data that National Science Foundation man­dat­ed be col­lect­ed and shared pub­licly by the NSFNET project.

Then the year I fin­ished grad­u­ate school was also the year that NSF decom­mis­sioned this back­bone, care­ful­ly imple­ment­ing it to pre­vent par­ti­tion­ing of the net­work. It was light­weight indus­tri­al pol­i­cy that stew­ard­ed a glob­al ecosys­tem into exis­tence. Boy was that a thing to watch in grad school.

So many pre­vi­ous awardees have spo­ken of the mag­ic sauce of the Internet. The oppo­site of secret sauce, I guess, because they all use the word open.” Open stan­dards, open archi­tec­ture, open source. They said this open­ness is what made the Internet the Internet. Which sounds most­ly right, although not much like how we expe­ri­ence the Internet today.

Paul Vixie, in his 2014 Hall of Fame accep­tance speech said he spent the first fif­teen years of his career mak­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tions eas­i­er across what he opti­misti­cal­ly imag­ined as human­i­ty’s dig­i­tal ner­vous sys­tem. The com­mer­cial­iza­tion of the Internet rep­re­sent­ed a bit of an inflec­tion point for his opti­mism, because he then said he spent the next fif­teen years try­ing to make com­mu­ni­ca­tions hard­er, or at least more selec­tive and secure, because of all of the mali­cious activ­i­ty con­tained in human­i­ty’s dig­i­tal ner­vous sys­tem. He’s still work­ing on that part, bless him.

I also had a front-row seat for this incred­i­bly cap­ti­vat­ing his­tor­i­cal inflec­tion point at the begin­ning of my career. And I was lucky to spend decades study­ing the result­ing ecosys­tem from as many sci­en­tif­ic angles as the polit­i­cal econ­o­my would allow. But it’s also clear that anoth­er mas­sive inflec­tion point is com­ing, from laissez-faire back to gov­ern­ment involve­ment. Because while this tech­nol­o­gy is still ear­ly in the process of rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing every oth­er ecosys­tem it touch­es, soci­ety is increas­ing­ly exposed to a range of harms seri­ous enough to cre­ate a pub­lic inter­est in mit­i­gat­ing them. This is scari­er than the first inflec­tion point, because the path to good reg­u­la­tion is not obvi­ous, and mis­takes by gov­ern­ments are more dan­ger­ous and take longer to undo than mis­takes by the pri­vate sec­tor. It’s not a space where move fast and break things” is a good idea. And yet, reg­u­la­tion often comes in a reac­tive mode, where the pri­or­i­ty is not deep thought about pos­si­ble ram­i­fi­ca­tions.

So, now is the time for Internet researchers, sci­en­tists, engi­neers, his­to­ri­ans, and schol­ars to think hard about what advice to give the gov­ern­ments of the world. And most impor­tant­ly, what sort of data can back up that advice, and how that data can be made avail­able so that mul­ti­ple stake­hold­ers can inde­pen­dent­ly and respon­si­bly ana­lyze it, so that we can have deep and pub­lic con­ver­sa­tions about the impli­ca­tions for pol­i­cy. Sustained mea­sure­ment, or com­pelling report­ing of data and its analy­sis gen­er­al­ly comes at con­sid­er­able effort and cost. So it must shed light on an impor­tant prob­lem. We need to be as pre­cise as we can about what those prob­lems are.

This rea­son­ing is moti­vat­ed by recent col­lab­o­ra­tion with my favorite Hall of Fame inductee David Clark, with whom I’ve been hon­ored to work with for years. Hoping to con­tribute to just this con­ver­sa­tion, we attend­ed to tax­on­o­mize the range of harms that can arise in the Internet ecosys­tem. Our goal was to help efforts to mit­i­gate harms in a more sys­tem­at­ic way, as opposed to fight­ing an end­less defen­sive bat­tle against what­ev­er comes next. Which is sort of what the head­lines sug­gest is hap­pen­ing now. It’s only a draft, but it’s a start, and Dave should prob­a­bly present it at an IETF ple­nary soon. Anyway, one of the punch­lines is that get­ting to a bet­ter place will require, among oth­er noble endeav­ors, mea­sure­ment and data analy­sis.

Thanks so much for this hon­or, which as soon as it’s pub­lic I’m gonna go tell my dream ream research group that it’s all their doing. They, and my cher­ished fam­i­ly that puts up with an idea-having me, are the wind beneath my wings. Thank you.

Further Reference

Internet Hall of Fame pro­file


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.