Vinay Gupta: Do you guys know about John Snow? He’s our local London stack­tivist saint.

So 1854, there’s a cholera out­break in London and peo­ple are drop­ping like flies. This is in the bad days when cholera could real­ly pret­ty much kill a city. This has hap­pened right in Soho. In fact there’s still a pub called John Snow right in Soho, which I quite often go to drink at sort of as a com­mem­o­ra­tion of Snow.

Snow takes a map of Soho and he draws a dot in every place where a per­son died, and pret­ty soon he’s got what he’s got what he calls a ghost map, and in the mid­dle of ghost map there is the Soho well. So he goes to the well and says, Right, what’s caus­ing the cholera must be in the water,” he takes the han­dle off the well, and the epi­dem­ic stops. And every­body goes, Wow. Cholera [inaudi­ble] water. You just stopped an epi­dem­ic. You’ve made the invis­i­ble vis­i­ble. Here’s the ghost map. Fantastic.”

The [inaudi­ble] after part, which I only dis­cov­ered when I was tak­ing a look at this stuff again last night, is that lat­er on they put the han­dle back on the well. They dig the whole thing up, they clean it up, put the han­dle back on the well, and the mem­o­ry that cholera’s caused by dirty water is polit­i­cal­ly sup­pressed because it’s such a gross thought that you throw shit in your water sup­ply. And they went right back to doing what they were doing before. Unbelievable.

So this stuff is prac­ti­cal and his­tor­i­cal in our con­text. This is not all stuff that hap­pens in oth­er people’s coun­tries. This actu­al­ly hap­pened right here 150 years ago, and it was a huge deal.

Now we’re going to go and real­ly go through the wide pic­ture of this. These things here are called hexa­yurts, and it’s an open-source build­ing. The nut­shell of why this is worth­while is the wall pieces are full pieces of 4×8, and all the roof pieces are half-sheets. So it’s the sim­plest way of tak­ing stan­dard indus­tri­al mate­ri­als and mass-producing hous­ing, from these small pods up to these very large build­ings. Zero waste, [?] effi­cient, easy to do, 1,000 units built at Burning Man last year, open hard­ware, epi­dem­ic.

If we were going to try and pro­vide for nine bil­lion peo­ple, let’s think about the nat­ur­al mate­r­i­al base. Copper. A bil­lion tons of cop­per ore, the ore is about 1% met­al. Actually, usu­al­ly .3, .5, but we’ll call it 1%. Take the amount of proven reserve and eco­nom­i­cal­ly recov­er­able ore, divide it by the num­ber of peo­ple, and it comes out to be a kilo­gram each, per life­time. That’s how much cop­per there is.

Now, as you do higher-priced cop­per, what’s eco­nom­i­cal­ly recov­er­able increas­es, but we’re still talk­ing on the order of 1, 5, 10 kilo­grams of cop­per per human per life­time. This is a com­plete­ly new kind of design chal­lenge. There’s no way that you can take the civ­i­liza­tion we have and re-scale it for 110 kilo­grams of cop­per per human per life­time. You just can’t. You have to think in a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent way if you’re going to oper­ate inside of this frame­work where you take the sus­tain­able har­vest of the Earth and you divide by nine bil­lion.

You don’t just have to divide by nine bil­lion now, you have to assume that future gen­er­a­tions will come, you have to leave the seed corn, you have to leave the stand­ing forests, you have to leave recy­clable mate­ri­als. Otherwise there’s just no way to make it work. It’s design with a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent con­straint. It’s not how you can make it back, it’s how can you con­tin­ue to make it back for thou­sands of years, per man­u­fac­tur­er.

So we have to go back to this core ques­tion: How do we turn what we have into what we need? And that core ques­tion is buried right at the heart of almost every human activ­i­ty. But all the way through it gets obscured by meth­ods. The core need is cov­ered up by the mar­ket, or it’s cov­ered up by social­ism, or it’s cov­ered up by envi­ron­men­tal­ism. But this is what we’re doing. And what makes us the tool-using ape is that we’ve got hands and minds and mouths which allow us a whole addi­tion­al set of options that we don’t oth­er­wise have, and it’s all around this agen­da.

Jay men­tioned the Simple Critical Infrastructure Maps stack. Let’s actu­al­ly break that map out. So, the things you need to stay alive. Shelter. You don’t want to be too hod or too cold; that’s the build­ing we’re in. Supply. You don’t want to be hun­gry or thirsty; that’s the food sup­ply chain from which you bought your break­fast this morn­ing. It’s the water you see all around you from munic­i­pal taps or plas­tic bot­tles that came from oth­er places. Illness and injury. If some­body got very ill for some rea­son, you call 999. If some­body came and tried to kick down the door, we’d call 999. Or we’d just beat the hell out of him. But all of this stuff forms a matrix of ser­vices around us. That matrix which Jay showed before spreads across lev­els, indi­vid­ual, group, orga­ni­za­tion, state, at increas­ing dis­tant lev­els.

For groups, you want three fac­tors: com­mu­ni­ca­tion, trans­port, work­space. Communication is how you knew to come here, transport’s how you got here, work­space is the build­ing that you’re in. That’s more or less every­thing that you need in terms of phys­i­cal assets for a civ­i­lized soci­ety. Six things to stop peo­ple dying, three things to help peo­ple form groups.

Organizations. Groups with spe­cial mis­sions. An orga­ni­za­tion is a group that decides it’s going to do some­thing. This is the archi­tec­ture for that deci­sion. You look at the map of real­i­ty that every­body agrees on, you make a plan rel­a­tive to the map, and if the peo­ple that have struc­tur­al pow­er in that sys­tem begin to mis­be­have you get rid of them, and every­body agrees how to do that [inaudi­ble].

From there you can move up to the state, again a com­plex struc­ture. Effective orga­ni­za­tion, claimed ter­ri­to­ry, a list of cit­i­zens, inter­na­tion­al recog­ni­tion, gets you a legal juris­dic­tion. And the legal juris­dic­tion is the equiv­a­lent of the suc­ces­sion mod­el for the orga­ni­za­tion. It’s how you can make deci­sions.

Now, half of that stuff is not phys­i­cal. The phys­i­cal objects: too hot, too cold, hunger, thirst, ill­ness, injury, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, trans­port, work­space). The non-phys­i­cal: resource con­trol, shared map, plan, suc­ces­sion mod­el, orga­ni­za­tion, ter­ri­to­ry, cit­i­zens, recog­ni­tion, juris­dic­tion. All that stuff is just ghosts in the machine. You can build an arbi­trar­i­ly com­plex and sophis­ti­cat­ed set of ghosts in the machine, on almost no phys­i­cal stuff. Athenian democ­ra­cy ran in a real­ly big square with peo­ple that shout­ed real­ly loud. So we can have a com­plex, sophis­ti­cat­ed soci­ety with­out hav­ing com­pli­cat­ed stuff.

SCIM

This is a map of how our soci­ety cur­rent­ly oper­ates, using this scheme. It’s actu­al­ly ten times more com­pli­cat­ed than that, but it’s bad enough to get us start­ed. Here’s your basic needs down one axis, here’s your tiers of polit­i­cal orga­ni­za­tion across the oth­er.

But if you go back to the vil­lage lev­el, sud­den­ly the com­plex­i­ty drops enor­mous­ly. Six basic needs, going out to the neigh­bor­hood or vil­lage lev­el of orga­ni­za­tion, that’s a much more solv­able prob­lem. So even if you add com­mu­ni­ca­tions, trans­port, and work­space, you only need to get nine things orga­nized up to the vil­lage lev­el in order to have a sus­tain­able soci­ety that you can then build arbi­trary lev­els of com­plex­i­ty on top of with­out increas­ing your phys­i­cal con­sump­tion foot­print. And that to me rep­re­sents a man­age­able pos­si­bil­i­ty. I can pret­ty much guar­an­tee that if we put some real work into fig­ur­ing out how to do the vil­lages, we could plan, we could exe­cute, we could suc­ceed in pro­duc­ing vil­lages that pro­duce an essen­tial­ly first-world stan­dard of liv­ing on a ful­ly sus­tain­able basis.

That is a list of tech­nolo­gies that I think are a third or a half of what you need to make the vil­lage work in almost any place in the world. It’s all there. It’s all lit­tle bits of plas­tic or cheap soft­ware or bits of met­al. It’s things that could be man­u­fac­tured to last for­ev­er. It’s a com­plete­ly work­able sys­tem.

I’m going to very quick­ly bang through a bonus round which was not sched­uled, but it’s kind of time­ly. But I’ll take ques­tions in two parts. When we get to ques­tions, we’ll take some ques­tions on the ongo­ing stuff of struc­tur­al activism, but I want to talk very briefly about stack­tivism and nation­al secu­ri­ty state. Basically, the thing that’s been tak­en off the polit­i­cal map and ren­dered invis­i­ble is the nuclear weapon. We stopped wor­ry­ing about this stuff in 1990 when declared peace, and the rea­son that we can’t get any effec­tive pur­chase against things like the NSA spy­ing is because the nuclear weapon is not sit­ting under the NSA.

There’s the nuclear bureau­cra­cy which is civil­ian nuclear pow­er plants that make the plu­to­ni­um, the enor­mous indus­tri­al base required to pro­duce the sub­marines and the mis­siles and pro­vide them plu­to­ni­um, and then all of the addi­tion­al infra­struc­ture required to pro­tect those assets from all threats for­eign and domes­tic. The NSA and sim­i­lar struc­tures are basi­cal­ly just parts of the nuclear bureau­cra­cy. It’s impos­si­ble to imag­ine putting so much pres­sure on the NSA that it goes away, or at least stops spy­ing on us, in a way that doesn’t acknowl­edge it’s part of a much larg­er, much more inte­grat­ed sys­tem.

That sys­tem now clear­ly includes Apple, Microsoft, and most of the big tech com­pa­nies. They’re all part of this nation­al secu­ri­ty struc­ture. The lev­el of sur­veil­lance that we’re oper­at­ing against is sub­stan­tial­ly high­er than what was envis­aged in 1984. In 1984, the viewscreen was not trav­el­ing in your pock­et, and it wasn’t looked at by machines, it was still looked at by human beings. Because the hard­ware that we use and the soft­ware that we use are all inter­con­nect­ed into this huge sys­tem, the lev­el of mon­i­tor­ing through the infra­struc­ture which is owned by large com­pa­nies, which are clients of the nation­al secu­ri­ty indus­try is absolute­ly enor­mous. So there’s a thread that goes from the cell phone in your pock­et, through the oper­at­ing sys­tem, then through the net­work, through the back­bones, through the hard­ware man­u­fac­tur­ers, all the way up to the nuclear weapons bureau­cra­cies.

The last thing is you want to be extreme­ly wary of cryp­tog­ra­phy because the tra­di­tion­al approach that secu­ri­ty agen­cies have tak­en to cryp­tog­ra­phy is very sim­ple. They allow your tar­get to believe that their cryp­to is secure, and then they com­mu­ni­cate on it as if it’s a secure chan­nel and they read every­thing they say. That’s what the NSA’s dream world is, and there’s a long his­to­ry of that state being pro­duced by extreme­ly sub­tle intel­li­gence meth­ods. So don’t trust civil­ian cryp­to. You might want to look at PGP 2.6.2, which is leg­en­dar­i­ly offen­sive to the state and there­fore might have been secure at the time. Whether it still is is an open ques­tion.

We have to real­ly think about oper­at­ing sys­tem secu­ri­ty in a com­plete­ly new way. The path that we’re cur­rent­ly on is impos­si­ble to secure in the long run. We need to go back to look­ing at things like capability-based oper­at­ing sys­tems. And until we rebuild a secure com­mu­ni­ca­tions infra­struc­ture which is own and man­aged by the peo­ple we’re not going to be any fur­ther for­ward. Whitespace mesh net­work is worth look­ing at.

So that’s the end of what I have to say. The pitch that I want to make is it’s pos­si­ble to man­age the crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture build-out of free, safe, sane soci­eties at the vil­lage lev­el of com­plex­i­ty with exist­ing tech­nol­o­gy and a bit of hard work. Everything past that is still spec­u­la­tive, but the stuff that we can do could poten­tial­ly put half of the human race on a real­ly sol­id foot­ing with­out requir­ing them to come into the same rat trap that we’re in.

Thank you.

Further Reference

Vinay's home page.

The Thought Menu


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.