Alright. Well, I’m here to start off the morn­ing by talk­ing about mon­ey and hap­pi­ness, and what sci­ence can tell us about how we might use the for­mer to get the lat­ter. In par­tic­u­lar, I want to sug­gest that mon­ey can both aid and impede the pur­suit of happiness.

Now, I first became inter­est­ed in this issue a few years back when I myself sud­den­ly came into a lot of mon­ey. When I say that I came into a lot of mon­ey what I mean is that I went from being a grad­u­ate stu­dent to being a fac­ul­ty mem­ber. So, I real­ize that most junior fac­ul­ty aren’t con­sid­ered wealthy. But we aca­d­e­mics have one great advan­tage, which is that we make so lit­tle mon­ey as grad­u­ate stu­dents that sud­den­ly hav­ing an actu­al salary feels like being instant­ly wealthy.

So this brings us to our first les­son about mon­ey and hap­pi­ness. We human beings are sen­si­tive to change. So we like it when mon­ey falls from the sky, when we sud­den­ly expe­ri­ence an increase in income. But like Dan Ariely’s frog, we adapt with remark­able speed to our new­found wealth. In fact, once peo­ple are mak­ing about seventy-five thou­sand dol­lars a year, addi­tion­al income ceas­es to have any real impact on peo­ple’s day-to-day happiness.

Now, this is a puz­zle. After all, much of eco­nom­ics and pub­lic pol­i­cy rests on the assump­tion that increas­ing the wealth of indi­vid­u­als and nations pro­vides a route to increas­ing their well­be­ing. So why does mon­ey fail us?

Well, we stum­bled across a nov­el answer to this ques­tion quite by acci­dent. In look­ing at a data set that my stu­dent had col­lect­ed for com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent rea­sons, we hap­pened to notice that the more mon­ey peo­ple had the less they report­ed savor­ing the lit­tle plea­sures of dai­ly life. So fol­low­ing up on this bit of serendip­i­ty, we con­duct­ed a larg­er study and exact­ly the same thing popped out.

So for exam­ple we asked peo­ple to imag­ine com­ing across a beau­ti­ful water­fall while on a hike. The more mon­ey peo­ple had, the less like­ly they were to say they would jump in and hoot with joy, or even to stand back and pause to real­ly appre­ci­ate the beau­ty of this moment. Now, this is impor­tant because the abil­i­ty to real­ly savor life’s plea­sures is impor­tant for hap­pi­ness. So this helps to explain why it is that the rela­tion­ship between mon­ey and hap­pi­ness is rel­a­tive­ly weak. At the same time that mon­ey does all kinds of great things for us, it also seems to get in the way of our hap­pi­ness by imped­ing our abil­i­ty to savor. So the idea here is that if you have a lot of mon­ey or even just kind of think about mon­ey, you feel like you can get what­ev­er you want. So you don’t real­ly need to savor every lit­tle morsel of plea­sure that comes your way.

So can we real­ly blame mon­ey? Is this mon­ey’s fault? Does wealth actu­al­ly cause us to savor less? Well, to find out we would love to make the peo­ple instant­ly wealthy, maybe here in the audi­ence today, see what hap­pens. Unfortunately we can’t do that. But, psy­chol­o­gists have devel­oped ways to make peo­ple tem­porar­i­ly feel and behave as though they them­selves are wealthy. In fact, all it takes is show­ing peo­ple a pho­to­graph of a big stack of money. 

Now, the rea­son why this works is that we all have pow­er­ful net­works of men­tal asso­ci­a­tions with the con­cepts of mon­ey and wealth. So it’s pret­ty easy for us psy­chol­o­gists to tap into these net­works, switch them on, and see what hap­pens. So we won­dered then whether just show­ing peo­ple a pho­to­graph of a big stack of mon­ey might actu­al­ly make them savor less.

So to find out, we con­duct­ed an exper­i­ment very much like one that many of you have already par­tic­i­pat­ed in this morn­ing. On your way into the the­ater, many of you were prob­a­bly offered a lit­tle piece of choco­late from my lab. Some of you may have noticed that for what­ev­er rea­son there was a pho­to­graph of a big stack of mon­ey on your choco­late. For oth­ers the same pho­to­graph was blurred beyond recognition. 

Small packages of chocolate labeled "Enjoy! Courtesy of Happy Lab UBC!" with an blurred-out image printed in the background

Now, I want to sug­gest to you that those of you who saw the pho­to­graph of the big stack of mon­ey on your choco­late may have enjoyed your choco­late less. I real­ize this sounds a lit­tle improb­a­ble, but that’s exact­ly what we found in a recent study. 

So we went up to peo­ple on our cam­pus at the University of British Columbia and we just asked them to eat a lit­tle piece of choco­late. Right before they ate the choco­late, we showed them a pho­to­graph of a big stack of our col­or­ful Canadian mon­ey, or a neu­tral pho­to. Meanwhile, we had sta­tioned observers near­by who could sur­rep­ti­tious­ly watch our par­tic­i­pants eat their choco­lates. What we found was that peo­ple who have been exposed to the pho­to­graph of the mon­ey spent less time eat­ing their choco­late and exhib­it­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly less enjoy­ment of it, as rat­ed by our observers. 

A sack labeled with a dollar sign and a yellow smiley face, with two arrows pointing from the bag. A black one with a plus sign, and a white one with a minus sign.

So this sug­gests, then, that mon­ey can actu­al­ly get in the way of hap­pi­ness by under­min­ing our capac­i­ty to savor. But if you go back to work on Monday and your boss is real­ly hap­py that you went to PopTech, and wants to offer you a big raise, I don’t want to sug­gest that you should turn it down. So, the rela­tion­ship between mon­ey and hap­pi­ness is pos­i­tive. It’s just that this rela­tion­ship is a lot weak­er than most peo­ple assume. And our research helps to illu­mi­nate why by speak­ing to this white arrow. 

So, in the sec­ond half of today’s talk I want to turn to the black arrow and think about how we can squeeze the most hap­pi­ness from our mon­ey. Now, this turns out to be a chal­lenge. As Robert Frank put it in an arti­cle enti­tled How Not to Buy Happiness,” People do not spend their extra mon­ey in ways that yield sig­nif­i­cant and last­ing increas­es in mea­sured sat­is­fac­tion.” In oth­er words, peo­ple don’t spend their mon­ey right. 

So, armed with my new­found wealth and a team of grad­u­ate stu­dents, I want­ed to fig­ure out how peo­ple could use their mon­ey bet­ter. In par­tic­u­lar, I won­dered whether peo­ple might actu­al­ly get more hap­pi­ness from spend­ing their mon­ey on oth­ers rather than on themselves. 

Now, to test this I had to make a lit­tle mon­ey fall from the sky. So we went out on cam­pus and just hand­ed peo­ple either a five a twenty-dollar bill ran­dom­ly in the morn­ing. And we asked them to spend this mon­ey by 5:00 PM that day. We told some peo­ple, Hey, we want you to spend this mon­ey on your­self.” We told oth­ers, We want you to spend this mon­ey on some­one else.”

So what did peo­ple do when they found them­selves with this bit of extra cash? Well, when we told peo­ple to spend the mon­ey on them­selves, they did things like buy­ing hear­ings, eye shad­ow, and food or drink for them­selves. By con­trast, when we told them to spend mon­ey on some­one else, they did things like buy­ing toys for younger sib­lings, mak­ing dona­tions to char­i­ty, as well as buy­ing food or drink for friends.

So the ques­tion is which type of spend­ing will leave peo­ple hap­pi­er at the end of the day? Well, when we called peo­ple back that night, par­tic­i­pants who had been told to spend the mon­ey on some­body else were sig­nif­i­cant­ly hap­pi­er than those who’d spent the mon­ey on them­selves. Of course we con­duct­ed this exper­i­ment in Vancouver. We con­duct­ed our oth­er ini­tial research in the United States. So we won­dered whether we might real­ly be look­ing at North American phe­nom­e­non. Many peo­ple have por­trayed North America as a kind of cul­ture of excess, so maybe our find­ing is real­ly lim­it­ed to this rather weird cul­tur­al context. 

We thought, how­ev­er, that maybe we were look­ing at a broad­er human phe­nom­e­non, in which case we should be able to detect the same kind of effect else­where in the world, even in much poor­er coun­tries. Now, at the time it just so hap­pened that my fiancé, who is an envi­ron­men­tal engi­neer, was con­duct­ing some vol­un­teer work in the East African nation of Uganda. So I asked him whether between find­ing safe, clean sources of fresh water for the peo­ple of Uganda, whether he could also maybe find me some col­lab­o­ra­tors in that coun­try. He suc­ceed­ed, and with the amaz­ing help of these local col­lab­o­ra­tors we were able to con­duct simul­ta­ne­ous research in Canada and Uganda.

This time rather than mak­ing mon­ey fall from the sky, we want­ed to see how peo­ple spent their own mon­ey in their day-to-day lives and look at the emo­tion­al con­se­quences of that real-world spend­ing. So we asked peo­ple to look back and real­ly vivid­ly reflect on a time when they’d spent mon­ey on oth­ers or on them­selves. So we asked peo­ple to think about a time they had spent either twen­ty Canadian dol­lars or its equiv­a­lent ten thou­sand Ugandan shillings. We’re giv­ing peo­ple in the two coun­tries the same instruc­tions. Half the peo­ple are told, Hey, tell us about a time you spent this mon­ey on your­self.” Half are told to tell us about a time they spent the mon­ey on some­body else.

Now, even though we gave peo­ple exact­ly the same instruc­tions, the kinds of spend­ing expe­ri­ences that peo­ple described in these two coun­tries were very dif­fer­ent. For exam­ple, in Canada one per­son wrote when asked to talk about a time when they’d spent mon­ey on some­one else, they wrote, I spent $20 for 2 dozen red ros­es from Costco for my moth­er’s birth­day.” Very nice. Very dif­fer­ent from what we see in Uganda, where for exam­ple one per­son wrote, I gave mon­ey to a friend of approx­i­mate­ly 12,000 Ush to buy med­ica­tion for his aching ulcers.”

Now, I have to be hon­est with you. When I was read­ing through these ques­tion­naires, I thought to myself, Okay, we are head­ing for a nec­es­sary fail­ure. We are not going to repli­cate the same effect that we’ve seem in Canada in Uganda,” because the spend­ing expe­ri­ences peo­ple were describ­ing just seemed so dif­fer­ent. And yet, to my sur­prise we found exact­ly the same effect in both coun­tries, where­by peo­ple felt sig­nif­i­cant­ly hap­pi­er when they looked back and reflect­ed on a time when they’d spent mon­ey on oth­ers rather than on themselves. 

So hav­ing seen these robust effects around the world, we won­dered whether the ben­e­fits of finan­cial gen­eros­i­ty might extend beyond the indi­vid­ual to teams and orga­ni­za­tion. So to look at this idea, we teamed up with a real­ly inno­v­a­tive non­prof­it called Karma Currency. Here’s how Karma Currency works. Let’s say that you are the President of a large bank, and your bank wants to make a major dona­tion to char­i­ty. You could just write one big fat check and be done with it. Or you could divide up that con­tri­bu­tion among your employ­ees and give each one of them a vouch­er for Karma Currency. Your employ­ees could then log in to Karma Currency and make a dona­tion on behalf of the com­pa­ny to the char­i­ty of their own choice.

So we won­dered, then, whether giv­ing employ­ees the oppor­tu­ni­ty to active­ly par­tic­i­pate in cor­po­rate giv­ing may actu­al­ly increase their own job sat­is­fac­tion. So to find out, we ran­dom­ly assigned some employ­ees at a large Australian bank to receive a hundred-dollar vouch­er for Karma Currency. Some peo­ple got it, some peo­ple did­n’t, so we could look at the impact. What we found was that giv­ing employ­ees the oppor­tu­ni­ty to give sig­nif­i­cant­ly increased their job sat­is­fac­tion. And I think this is pret­ty inter­est­ing in light of some recent head­lines about the very low lev­els of job sat­is­fac­tion cur­rent­ly in America. So this sug­gests that actu­al­ly enabling peo­ple to be gen­er­ous can pro­vide a sort of sur­pris­ing route to increas­ing their own satisfaction.

Now, push­ing this idea even fur­ther, we want­ed to see whether finan­cial gen­eros­i­ty might not only improve employ­ees’ job sat­is­fac­tion but also increase per­for­mance with­in teams. To look at this idea, we exam­ined two very dif­fer­ent kinds of teams, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal sales teams in Belgium, and dodge­ball teams in Canada. So, what we did is we went in to each team and we gave a few peo­ple on each team a lit­tle bit of mon­ey to spend. On some teams, we told every­one, Okay, just spend this mon­ey on your­selves.” On oth­er teams we said, Alright, we want you to spend this mon­ey on your teammates.”

Well, as it turned out, when peo­ple had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to spend mon­ey on their team­mates, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal sales teams sold more drugs and dodge­ball teams won more games. So, this sug­gests that spend­ing mon­ey on oth­ers may be a good way to go whether you want to change the world, increase your own hap­pi­ness, or just win a game of dodgeball. 

Now, if you go out­side today and find that the love­ly Camden sun­shine has been replaced by a down­pour of cash, I would encour­age you to go ahead and grab some of it, but think about spend­ing some of it on oth­ers. And of course don’t for­get to take a lit­tle extra time to enjoy your choco­late. Thank you. 

Further Reference

Elizabeth Dunn’s web site at University of British Columbia

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.