Scott Sullivan: Okay, so this work start­ed for me back in 2017 when I read the arti­cle The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells. Has any­body read this? Shortly after he came out with a book of the same title. Reading this book has been described as an act of emo­tion­al vio­lence. So if you’re into not sleep­ing at night, I high­ly rec­om­mend it. 

So basi­cal­ly the author, he read a lot of stud­ies, and he’s a jour­nal­ist, and he basi­cal­ly found out that the media was dras­ti­cal­ly under-reporting the sever­i­ty and speed of the cli­mate cri­sis. So he wrote this book, and and real­ly one of the big take­aways for me was that the cli­mate is going to be the dom­i­nant lens of soci­ety going for­ward, right. It’s going to affect big, large-scale geopo­lit­i­cal deci­sions kind of all the way down to the per­son­al lev­el. To where we work, what we eat, where we live. 

So basi­cal­ly, I read this book, I read a bunch of oth­er books. I’m shit­ting my pants. And I have to fig­ure out what to do. I have to fig­ure out some­thing to do. A lot of peo­ple are moti­vat­ed by more pos­i­tive things, and utopi­an kind of things. I am appar­ent­ly moti­vat­ed by ter­ror. It works. 

So I start­ed off kin­da weird. I start­ed mak­ing weird videos for my then-unborn daugh­ter. Making videos of gro­cery stores because I think that gro­cery stores are going to look very dif­fer­ent and I want­ed to show or what they used to be like before she was born. As was pre­vi­ous­ly men­tioned, I start­ed grow­ing a cou­ple hun­dred trees and threw up solar pan­els on the top of my house. And just kind of scat­ter­ing things around and try­ing to fig­ure out what to do. 

And you know, ulti­mate­ly I kin­da had some of my local bases cov­ered. Like imme­di­ate com­mu­ni­ty. I start­ed flood­ing all my friends with trees for them to plant. But I need­ed to fig­ure out what I could do as a design­er in the future. Like as a human-centered design­er what is my role, what is our role, in this kind of big­ger pic­ture? If this is the dom­i­nant lens of soci­ety, what’s our contribution? 

So look­ing around, a lot of the design­er things that are around the cli­mate or you know, eco­log­i­cal things, are all plastic-based. And that makes sense. Plastic is kin­da easy to wrap your head around. You cut open a bird, it’s full of plas­tic, and then you look down at your hand, and it also has plas­tic, and it’s easy to kind of make that 1:1 con­nec­tion with like the kind of cause and effect of that behavior. 

But ulti­mate­ly I kin­da see this stuff as you know, not all that use­ful to the big pic­ture which is this, right: 

So this is our big tar­get vari­able. 411.85, the num­ber of parts per mil­lion of car­bon diox­ide in our atmos­phere. And this is much more dif­fi­cult to real­ly wrap your head around. I mean there’s not even units, right. It’s just a ratio. It’s .00004 of our atmos­phere and some­how that gives us the ter­ror in Australia and you know, half of Bangladesh flood­ed out. A mil­lion refugees out of Syria. And California on fire, Venice flooded. 

And that’s at 1.1 degrees. So, this is a big­ger prob­lem, right. Figuring out what to do and fig­ur­ing out how to kind of like, explain this to me and every­one else in a rea­son­able way.

So Dan Ariely, a behav­ioral econ­o­mist, he describes the cli­mate cri­sis as basi­cal­ly the per­fect storm of human apa­thy, for three big rea­sons. So one is that it’s gen­er­al­ly seen as long-term and in the future, at least when he made this state­ment it was seen as more long-term and in the future. Generally when we don’t see things hap­pen­ing as a direct effect of what we’re doing, it’s hard­er to care. But the biggest thing is that any­thing we do is going to be more or less a drop in the buck­et for this spe­cif­ic cause. So there’s noth­ing that I as an indi­vid­ual or you as an indi­vid­ual are ever going to do where you are going to see the mate­r­i­al out­put of that reflect­ed in the world. It’s not gonna hap­pen. This is a mas­sive, huge, col­lec­tive problem. 

A wide landscape with pipes zig-zagging across the terrain leading toward a large factory-style building billowing large clouds of white vapor

So. Once again, as design­ers how do we tack­le this? We look around, and most of the solu­tions in this space are large-scale. They’re engi­neer­ing things. This is an amaz­ing project. This is CarbFix by Reykjavik Energy. We see a lot of kind of renew­able ener­gy kind of things; smart grid. Cool agri­cul­tur­al projects. These are kin­da big, and they’re very engineering-focused. And ulti­mate­ly, we look at the size of the prob­lem. The speed of this work is going to be too lit­tle too late to scale by the time we need to scale it up. 

So luck­i­ly, the oth­er 80% of the solu­tion is some­thing we can affect. And basi­cal­ly what needs to hap­pen is a mas­sive reduc­tion of con­sump­tion, and that’s going to require behav­ioral change. So that’s kind of where I land­ed in terms of how design is going to con­tribute to this. 

And that is aus­ter­i­ty as a ser­vice. So, basi­cal­ly in my work in the past as a humans-centered design­er, behav­ioral change is pret­ty much the most mean­ing­ful work that I have done. So, I did a lot of work in the wear­ables indus­try. So help­ing to enable peo­ple to meet their own per­son­al goals in terms of health. Did a lot of work with Capital One in behav­ior change, help­ing peo­ple work towards their finan­cial goals. 

So, I’m going to walk through this idea of what this might look like. And I’m going to use a lot of exam­ples around reduc­tion of home ener­gy but real­ly this applies to any­thing. Like, per­son­al use in home is kind of one of the more… Energy in the home is a more obvi­ous exam­ple of this. But it applies to retail, food, any kind of finan­cial ser­vices. There’s going to be some lev­el of reduc­tion and this is going to be reflect­ed across all aspects of our society. 

UN Emissions Gap Report 2019

By 2030, emis­sions would need to be 25 per­cent and 55 per­cent low­er than in 2018 to put the world on the least-cost path­way to lim­it­ing glob­al warm­ing to below 2°C and 1.5°C respectively.

North America = 80%
UN Emissions Gap Report 2019 [pre­sen­ta­tion slide]

So how much do we need to lose? We talked before about what our tar­gets for 20302030’s a big year. Basically, to stay at 1.5 degrees—which is not going to hap­pen. 2 is prob­a­bly not going to hap­pen but let’s just say this is our goal. We need to get 55% low­er. And if we lived in an equi­table soci­ety, which we should, me—my part of the world, North America needs to lose about 80%. Because it’s 55% across the board and we pro­duce far more than average. 

So how do we do that? So let’s say we’ve got ten years to do this. We want to help peo­ple reduce 10% every year for X num­ber of years. 

Step one is run­way. This is real­ly the most impor­tant part of this. It’s for mul­ti­ple rea­sons, right. So we’re giv­ing them a year, if pos­si­ble, before for­mal­ly enforc­ing kind of any restric­tions on con­sump­tion. And this is good for a cou­ple rea­sons. The first of which is that we’re not impos­ing it on peo­ple right away. We’re actu­al­ly impos­ing this restric­tion on a kind of dis­em­bod­ied future self that they can kind of dis­con­nect from and put that off for a lit­tle bit, which is good, right. So our chances of accep­tance in gen­er­al are much bet­ter in that case. 

But more impor­tant­ly than that, it gives us as design­ers this onboard­ing peri­od. It gives us a cer­tain amount of time— And most of the most impor­tant work that we’re going to be doing here in this whole like, thread of work, is going to be in this run­way. And what that looks like is gonna be a lot of expe­ri­en­tial learning. 

Abstract information becomes more accessible in your personal context.

So, there’s a lot of abstract infor­ma­tion, espe­cial­ly with behav­ior change. So a good exam­ple of this is with Fitbit and the first kind of pedome­ters. If you remem­ber when they came out, the goal was 10,000 steps. And if you would’ve asked me the day before I got my first Fitbit 1, if you would’ve told me, You take three thou­sand steps a day,” I would’ve believed you. If you would’ve told me I took fif­teen thou­sand steps a day, I would’ve believe you because I have no idea, right. These are big num­bers. I know what five steps looks like and feels like, but I have no idea what ten thou­sand feels like. 

And that was the first big break­through of these wear­able devices. So, what we did was we were able to kind of con­tex­tu­al­ize our own behav­ior so the first day that you got that Fitbit, you just kind of went about your dai­ly life. You’re like okay, so I took 7,000 steps. So you know what 7,000 feels like. You know what your day was like when you took 7,000 steps, and if you want to work towards a goal you’re gonna have to take that day and do a lit­tle bit more. You’re going to have to mean­der on your way to work, take a lit­tle walk on your lunch break. Get it up a lit­tle bit. And over time…as quick­ly as a week or two, once you kind of change those habits and change your behav­ior, right—we’re chang­ing behavior—you don’t even need to mea­sure it any­more because you know what the day is like and you just live that day. The device becomes almost meaningless. 

So, that’s what we real­ly need to focus on here. When we’re ask­ing peo­ple to make changes in their behav­ior and habits, we need to first con­tex­tu­al­ized with their exist­ing behavior. 

So gen­er­al­ly, there’s this kind of cause/effect cycle. So there’s going to be a peri­od of mea­sured behav­ior. Then we give them feed­back. We allow them to say, Okay, so here’s this abstract num­ber. You just lived this peri­od of time. And this is what you did dur­ing this peri­od of time.” They make an adjust­ment in behav­ior. Then we mea­sure that adjust­ed behav­ior. And then we give them feed­back on that adjust­ment cycle. So you made this change, and this is the result of that change. And gen­er­al­ly you know, in a year we might get three or four good cycles where peo­ple can start to build that under­stand­ing of the cause and effect rela­tion­ship between their behav­ior and the con­se­quences of that behav­ior in some kind of met­ric that we choose. 

Proactive intervention and increased access to tools and methods to meet goals.

And the third big part is this the inter­ven­tion and acces­si­ble action. So, dur­ing that time peri­od when we’re ask­ing them to mod­i­fy their behav­ior, we’re going to present them with options. Different alter­na­tives to what they’re doing right now. A lot of it is going to be like—so for the elec­tric­i­ty and hous­ing ener­gy con­sump­tion, it’s going to be sub­si­diz­ing high-performance insu­la­tion. In the food area it might be build­ing com­mu­ni­ty gar­dens. Or you know, mak­ing out-of-season pro­duce require far more stamps to pur­chase than in-sea­son pro­duce which might require zero stamps. Kinda stuff like that. 

Beyond that, the big thing is these kind of…these inter­ven­tions, okay. So these gen­er­al­ly hap­pen in two dif­fer­ent ways and it real­ly depends on the kind of lev­el of fideli­ty of the data that you have avail­able to you. So, if you’re get­ting real-time data, you can have threshold-based inter­ven­tions. And these are by far the most use­ful, I would say. And what I mean is that you’re con­sum­ing X amount of any­thing… This is some­thing that was real­ly big in bank­ing. So you know, we had real-time infor­ma­tion on what peo­ple were spend­ing because they were spend­ing it via us, right, Capital One. And we were able to kind of craft these inter­ven­tion say­ing, Hey look, you have this finan­cial goal. You crossed this thresh­old in spend­ing. So like, you can do what­ev­er you want, but we just want to let you know that you want to buy a house in five years…you’re going to have to tone it back a lit­tle bit.” That’s it. 

Other than that, if we don’t have that lev­el of infor­ma­tion, which is prob­a­bly going to be like­ly at least for the hous­ing stuff, it’s going to have to be kind of planned inter­vals like say­ing, Hey. Just a reminder. What’s up. You need to be a lit­tle cau­tious with your use of elec­tric­i­ty this month.” 

So, this is some­thing that feels weird, I guess, for all of us kind of design­ing back­wards from what we were doing before. And it also…I don’t think is going to be some­thing that we’re going to do with a con­sumer lens, right. I think this is going to be at a gov­ern­ment lev­el. It’s going to be kind of enforced from the top down. There’s us, all of us bleed­ing hearts in this room that would prob­a­bly do a lot of this at least some of it vol­un­tar­i­ly. But we’re not going to get down 80%. And there’s also the xeno­pho­bic 30% of soci­ety with Fuck Greta” bumper stick­ers that are def­i­nite­ly not going to do it vol­un­tar­i­ly. So there needs to be a sys­tem in place, like a much high­er pow­er who’s actu­al­ly kind of enforc­ing these things. 

And this is kin­da dark, right, this is a dark time­line. It’s not fun. It’s not fun for any­body. But these reduc­tions, it’s very impor­tant to kind of keep in mind that this reduc­tion of con­sump­tion is going to hap­pen one way or anoth­er. So it’s either going to hap­pen when we do it vol­un­tar­i­ly and it’s designed and we do it in a way that allows peo­ple to have some lev­el of dig­ni­ty. Or it’s going to hap­pen when the… When there’s a col­lapse. When the infra­struc­ture that allows us to con­sume at the lev­el that we’re cur­rent­ly con­sum­ing no longer exists. And that’s it. Thank you very much.

Further Reference

Session page


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.