Rob Riemen: What would have been the com­ment of Hannah Arendt on what’s going on now? What would she say?

Roger Berkowitz: [laughs] Well, I run the Hannah Arendt Center, I found­ed the Hannah Arendt Center. One of the pit­falls of being in this posi­tion is peo­ple ask you what would Hannah Arendt say, and I haz­ard to speak for her. So what I try and do is speak for myself, but informed by her think­ing and hope that that’s good enough. I’m not going to chan­nel Hannah Arendt from the grave.

Hannah Arendt loved it when unex­pect­ed things hap­pened in pol­i­tics. She thinks and thought that spon­tane­ity, new­ness… She used the word natal­i­ty,” which is often mis­used and abused in her work by oth­ers, but it means birth, birth­li­ness. And she thought that what made human beings dif­fer­ent from oth­er ani­mals is not that we were ratio­nal, but that we could start things new. That we were free. And it’s that amaz­ing free­dom which she says that in even the dark­est times gives us hope that some­thing good can emerge, some­thing new.

And so she always was attract­ed to moments in his­to­ry, moments in pol­i­tics, when a new thing broke out. So, the Hungarian Revolution was very mean­ing­ful and attrac­tive to her. The protest move­ments in the 60s were very mean­ing­ful and attrac­tive to her, both in the United States and also in Europe. The civ­il rights move­ment was some­thing she was very engaged in. Inevitably, she found things to wor­ry about and not like about a lot of these move­ments. They often had neg­a­tive out­comes or neg­a­tive attrib­ut­es or char­ac­ter­is­tics that she found trou­ble­some.

But she always found the new excit­ing. And to the extent we’re in a moment, around the world…in Europe and else­where, but also the United States, where there’s a real sense around the world that lib­er­al rep­re­sen­ta­tive democ­ra­cy is fail­ing and is ille­git­i­mate, and that this way of gov­ern­ing our­selves that has real­ly been the great suc­cess sto­ry of the last 250 years is ceas­ing to hold peo­ple and con­vince peo­ple that it works, there’s no doubt that we’re in a moment when lots of new ideas are going to emerge. And she would like that. I think she would be skep­ti­cal of many of the ideas that have emerged.

So, on the right, I think she would be excit­ed by a lot of what the Tea Party rep­re­sents. One of the most impor­tant aspects of her work was her real fear and belief that cen­tral­iza­tion, the cen­tral­iza­tion of pow­er into one insti­tu­tion or to a pow­er­ful cen­ter, was the great­est threat to free­dom. And I think she would see the Tea Party, in its fear of and oppo­si­tion to cen­tral­iza­tion and bureau­cra­ti­za­tion and fed­er­al pow­er, she would see a lot to like in the Tea Party. But in its sort of low‐class racism and anti‐immigrant stances, she would be very fear­ful of it.

I think on the left, with Occupy Wall Street or with Bernie Sanders’ cam­paign, there’s a lot she would like about it. She loved it when young peo­ple had fun in pol­i­tics. And by the way, both on the left and the right; the Tea Party with their uni­forms and their hats, but also Occupy Wall Street with its sort of…really just being togeth­er and hav­ing fun talk­ing about pol­i­tics, I think she would—I’m sure she would have found very wel­come.

But the sort of single‐minded focus on inequal­i­ty and mon­ey, both of which are impor­tant and are with­out a doubt prob­lems in our soci­ety— The idea that we’re going to solve those prob­lems through a kind of social­ism, or demo­c­ra­t­ic social­ism, she would, I think, large­ly have found again prob­lem­at­ic. She thought social­ism or ideas that had been tried and failed through­out the world gen­er­al­ly led to tyran­ny and total­i­tar­i­an­ism. She thought that it was fair­ly obvi­ous at this day and age that as bad as cap­i­tal­ism was because it expro­pri­at­ed peo­ple by the rich, social­ism was just as bad in that it expro­pri­at­ed peo­ple by the gov­ern­ment. And I think she would be very wor­ried that the sort of simple‐minded return to, in her mind, dis­cred­it­ed ideas on the left was not lead­ing toward some­thing new. It was actu­al­ly lead­ing to some­thing stale and old.

Further Reference

Democracy Today in the USA event page


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.