So, thir­ty years ago if you want­ed to get a new com­put­er and use it you had to sur­ren­der your free­dom by installing a user-subjugating pro­pri­etary oper­at­ing sys­tem. So I decid­ed to fix that by devel­op­ing anoth­er oper­at­ing sys­tem and make it free, and it’s called GNU, but most the time you’ll hear peo­ple erro­neous­ly call­ing it Linux. Please, please give us equal men­tion. Linux is the name of one com­po­nent, the ker­nel of this sys­tem. If you call it GNU plus Linux, you’ll give the prin­ci­pal devel­op­ers equal mention.

However, of course, we also with our com­put­ers nowa­days talk to the Internet, which is anoth­er way that our free­dom can be tak­en away. The Internet was orig­i­nal­ly designed with the idea that your com­put­er could talk with my com­put­er if we want­ed to do some­thing togeth­er, the end-to-end prin­ci­ple. But this has been trashed by a bunch of com­pa­nies like ISPs that don’t allow sub­scribers to receive con­nec­tions, com­put­ers designed to be so weak that the only thing you could do with them is use them as front end for cen­tral­ized ser­vices. And of course the com­pa­nies that set up these cen­tral­ized ser­vices to try to sur­veil peo­ple as much as pos­si­ble, and hand over all the infor­ma­tion they col­lect to the NSA. Which turns the whole thing into some­thing monstrous.

So if we want the Internet to be some­thing good for human free­dom instead of the final cur­tain call for human free­dom, we need to fight hard. And above all we’ve got to beware of any­one propos­ing smart this or that that’s going to talk to the Internet, or the Internet of Things. Their idea I guess is that every appli­ance in your house would be yet anoth­er sur­veil­lance oppor­tu­ni­ty for the NSA. And also if it’s run­ning non-free soft­ware anoth­er way for com­pa­nies to con­trol you and prob­a­bly have bad secu­ri­ty so that lots of oth­ers can mis­treat you. I won’t let any of the things in my domi­cile be part of the Internet of Things unless it’s run­ning free soft­ware and set up by peo­ple I know I can trust not to turn it into a ten­ta­cle of surveillance.

And one of the things we need to pre­vent this is prop­er laws. That is, not the laws busi­ness­es want. For instance, if we switch from using land­line tele­phones to Voice Over IP, for that to be a step for­ward rather than a step back we’ve got to make sure that com­mon car­ri­er laws that apply to land­line tele­phones (except where com­pa­nies have suc­ceed here in pur­chas­ing the abo­li­tion of these good reg­u­la­tions) we’ve go to make sure it’s the same for any replace­ment sys­tem that we might use. Which trans­lates basi­cal­ly into net­work neu­tral­i­ty. We’ve got to have the total­ly clear and firm net­work neu­tral­i­ty, just as firm as for tele­phone lines. So, if you agree with any of this stuff, you might want to join the Free Software Foundation at fsf​.org.

Further Reference

Richard Stallman profile, Internet Hall of Fame 2013

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.