Very enjoy­ing being here and get­ting lots of new ideas and tid­bits, and you know, streams of thought hap­pen­ing, which is very excit­ing. So yes, very briefly my work has involved an explo­ration of shaman­ism. I’m sort of an out­line, I guess, at this event. But my first book, Breaking Open the Head was about psy­che­del­ic drugs, psy­che­del­ic plants, vision­ary plants, par­tic­u­lar­ly as used in indige­nous soci­eties, trib­al soci­eties. I vis­it­ed West Africa to work with a tribe called the Bwiti, who use a sub­stance called ibo­ga. I was in the Amazon in Ecuador, work­ing with ayahuas­ca with a tribe called the Secoya. Visited the Mazatec Indians in Mexico. 

This led me to a sec­ond book, 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl, where I was look­ing at prophe­cies that many indige­nous cul­tures pos­sess around this time. I guess in a way I start­ed as a skep­tic and a sci­en­tif­ic mate­ri­al­ist. Through under­go­ing all sorts of shaman­ic expe­ri­ences in dif­fer­ent con­texts, my world­view shift­ed to embrace more of a mys­ti­cal spir­i­tu­al per­spec­tive, which was very sur­pris­ing to me and some­thing that I think we real­ly can only access on an indi­vid­ual lev­el if we under­go our own jour­ney of trans­for­ma­tion and inquiry.

And yes, as she men­tioned, the book that I’m fin­ish­ing now is called How Soon is Now?, and essen­tial­ly it’s about look­ing at the eco­log­i­cal cri­sis that human­i­ty now faces as a col­lec­tive rite of pas­sage, or ini­ti­a­tion, much like shaman­ic ini­ti­a­tion. And I think the German Jewish crit­ic Walter Benjamin, writ­ing in the 1920s, look­ing at the first World War, not­ed his belief that human­i­ty has an innate need, a kind of impul­sion, to com­mune with the cos­mic pow­ers, he called them. And that we are always going to either sat­is­fy this innate need through rit­u­al, through cer­e­mo­ny, through some type of ecsta­t­ic cel­e­bra­to­ry event, or if that is blocked to us it may hap­pen that we end up releas­ing the same ener­gies destructively. 

You know, obvi­ous­ly human­i­ty has known for about a half cen­tu­ry or more…well, real­ly even since the 19th cen­tu­ry that the path of indus­tri­al civ­i­liza­tion was com­ing into con­flict with the eco­log­i­cal sup­port sys­tems of the plan­et. And I think we now know that we’ve reached a crit­i­cal thresh­old that we only have maybe a short peri­od of time—five, ten, twen­ty years—to real­ly some­how redi­rect our activ­i­ty as a species on the planet.

Obviously what’s hap­pen­ing— We share, and— In oth­er types of engage­ments around the fore­front of dig­i­tal tech­nol­o­gy, there’s this prospect that we could kind of trans­form our social sys­tem so that it is more in har­mo­ny with the plan­et. So, peo­ple are col­lab­o­rat­ing more, con­serv­ing resources, shar­ing resources, and so on.

So, here Walter Benjamin in the 20s, look­ing at the first World War in that sense. An idea that’s been explored a lot is that what makes us dis­tinct­ly human is the pre­frontal cor­tex, which only devel­oped in the last hun­dred thou­sand years. That’s what allows us to process abstract sym­bols, to plan for the future, and so on. 

An idea that the thinker Joseph Chilton Pearce devel­oped in his book, The Biology of Transcendence is that although the pre­frontal cor­tex devel­ops through ado­les­cence, it actu­al­ly requires a sec­ond kind of arti­fi­cial shock to reach its full func­tion­ing. And that’s why all these indige­nous and tra­di­tion­al cul­tures around the world have ini­ti­a­tion cer­e­monies that are often very dif­fi­cult. They could involve the psy­che­del­ic expe­ri­ence through ayahuas­ca or pey­ote. Or they might involve in Australian Aboriginal cul­ture the walk­a­bout, where peo­ple have to fast and go on vision quests in the wilder­ness and so on.

Modern civ­i­liza­tion was the first one that did away with these types of ini­ti­a­tion events, and there­fore peo­ple devel­op with­out that sec­ond shock which poten­tial­ly leads them to shift from a pure­ly egoic sense of iden­ti­ty to a more kind of transper­son­al state of con­scious­ness. Which even if you only have that expe­ri­ence a few times can act as a kind of per­ma­nent ref­er­ence point, where you’re aware that on some lev­el there’s a uni­ty of con­scious­ness under­ly­ing your your sep­a­rate identity.

So I think that Western mod­ern civ­i­liza­tion end­ed up kind of caught in a trap locked in its egoic struc­ture, and based our whole trip on kind of hyper­indi­vid­u­al­ism, accu­mu­la­tion of resources, and so on. And we’ve now reached a point where we can’t go fur­ther than that. And in a sense we could look at the idea that we’ve sub­con­scious­ly, uncon­scious­ly, some­how self-willed this eco­log­i­cal cri­sis to bring about our own trans­for­ma­tion, our own transcendence.

There’s an idea that when dis­as­ters strike, peo­ple become destruc­tive. But actu­al­ly a lot of peo­ple have not­ed that extreme cir­cum­stances, whether it’s Katrina or so on, peo­ple actu­al­ly shift out of that egoic struc­ture and go into a state of com­pas­sion and altru­ism and shar­ing, and so on. Now, obvi­ous­ly we don’t need to go through this kind of dis­as­ter as a species to access that oth­er capac­i­ty, but that seems to be the way we’re head­ing now, and unfor­tu­nate­ly our soci­ety is basi­cal­ly pro­gram­ming peo­ple through media, through sys­tems of edu­ca­tion and indoc­tri­na­tion, to main­tain kind of dis­em­pow­ered mem­bers of a con­sumer society. 

So yes, that’s basic the­sis of the book. It’s not that I think that every­body needs to take psy­che­delics, or what­ev­er. But I do think that under­stand­ing that we’re in a species-wide cri­sis where our hyper­indi­vid­u­al­ism is kind of keep­ing us from our next evo­lu­tion­ary kind of jump as a species is very crucial.

And once again, when I think about what this con­fer­ence is real­ly about, it’s real­ly about this poten­tial— There’s almost this ques­tion of whether the cut­ting edge of this tech­nol­o­gy is going to allow us— I mean, is it some­thing that the cor­po­rate sys­tem, the busi­ness sys­tem, the gov­ern­ments, are going to kind of assim­i­late into busi­ness as usu­al, or is there the capac­i­ty for it to lead to a deep­er trans­for­ma­tion? And I real­ly liked what Vinay was talk­ing about the oth­er day about, for instance through the blockchain the poten­tial to actu­al­ly have a glob­al democ­ra­cy. And I guess I’ve been brood­ing on his speech ever since he spoke and think­ing about how he was talk­ing about the West would real­ly have to be will­ing to kind of reduce our lifestyle sig­nif­i­cant­ly and almost go into a state of being will­ing to make repa­ra­tions for the excess­es of colonialism.

And we’re see­ing in a lot of thinkers right now, I mean it’s amaz­ing. You read all these dif­fer­ent futur­ists and there’s such a bifur­ca­tion. You have peo­ple like Roy Scranton, who wrote Learning to Die in the Anthropocene, who basi­cal­ly argues that it’s too late to deal with the thrust of our civ­i­liza­tion towards destruc­tion, and we have to just sort of sur­ren­der into that.

And then you have peo­ple like the peo­ple that wrote Abundance, Peter Diamandis, who see tech­nol­o­gy evolv­ing expo­nen­tial­ly with the capac­i­ty to ful­fill human needs on a glob­al scale. We see a book called PostCapitalism by Paul Mason, the work of Jeremy Rifkin, who are point­ing to this once again, this idea of poten­tial for an expo­nen­tial scal­ing of sus­tain­able tech­nolo­gies, decen­tral­iza­tion, resilience, and how we could actu­al­ly avert a mega­cat­a­stro­phe. But by shift­ing into this mode of dis­trib­uted resource, par­tic­i­pa­to­ry democ­ra­cy, relo­cal­iza­tion with­in a tru­ly plan­e­tary frame­work, we have this pre­cious oppor­tu­ni­ty over the next few years (we don’t real­ly know how many) to deal with this cri­sis. Does this res­onate with peo­ple in terms of how they’re feel­ing about what’s happening? 

You look at cli­mate change, species extinc­tion, ocean acid­i­fi­ca­tion, the plan­e­tary bound­aries mod­el from the Stockholm Resilience group. We’re real­ly at that crit­i­cal junc­ture where it’s kind of make or break. And to get through that kind of ini­tia­to­ry jour­ney that we have to make as a cul­ture, maybe we could look at the 60s as a first stage of a voy­age of col­lec­tive ini­ti­a­tion, where peo­ple accessed mys­ti­cism, move­ments of civ­il soci­ety, social lib­er­a­tion, sex­u­al lib­er­a­tion, racial lib­er­a­tion, equal­i­ty, and so on. But that only reached a cer­tain thresh­old in that time, then it got kind of reas­sim­i­lat­ed or rein­te­grat­ed into the cor­po­rate megamachine.

So now we’re at this next lev­el of this thresh­old of trans­for­ma­tion, where you could look at it almost like a birthing process, almost like con­trac­tions of a birth. And the ques­tion is whether we are going to push through into a dif­fer­ent social mod­el. And in fact anoth­er major theme of my book, which oth­er peo­ple have also looked at, is this idea that what’s emerg­ing is this poten­tial for human­i­ty to real­ize itself as a plan­e­tary super­or­gan­ism. A super­or­gan­ism that’s in a sym­bi­ot­ic rela­tion­ship with the Earth’s ecol­o­gy as a whole system. 

So, if we think about that, if we see our­selves as like a giant hive, we can see that that’s also a tra­jec­to­ry of evo­lu­tion. Biological evo­lu­tion is often mak­ing this shift from com­pe­ti­tion, aggres­sion, dom­i­na­tion, to coop­er­a­tion and sym­bio­sis. And we see a tremen­dous exam­ple of that in our own bod­ies. Our bod­ies were once, mil­lions of years ago, colonies of microor­gan­isms that were com­pet­ing in an envi­ron­ment for scarce resources, try­ing to eat each oth­er, try­ing to con­sume each oth­er, as Lynn Margulis talks about in Microcosmos. And then some­how in the midst of cri­sis, these colonies of microor­gan­isms start­ed to learn how to con­struct more com­plex struc­tures togeth­er, such as skin and eye and bones and so on. 

And we can see that every­thing that we’re actu­al­ly doing tech­no­log­i­cal­ly is kind of repli­cat­ing stuff we already find in the microor­gan­is­mic world. Like virus­es are able to trans­fer genet­ic infor­ma­tion around the plan­et. Like the Earth has a kind of Internet through the viral and bac­te­r­i­al world, through the mycelial world, which is able to learn how to break down dif­fer­ent tox­ins and trans­mute them into nour­ish­ment, and so on.

So essen­tial­ly, it’s quite pos­si­ble that human­i­ty itself is actu­al­ly in, still, even though we think we’ve sep­a­rat­ed from nature, we’re actu­al­ly in a kind of evo­lu­tion­ary bio­log­i­cal process where we’re mov­ing towards our next lev­el of emer­gence. Becoming aware of our­selves as a plan­e­tary super­or­gan­ism, and then act­ing from that per­spec­tive. In a way, we would have to kind of reverse engi­neer where we would want to get to from where we are now. Much the way Steve Jobs and Apple had to prob­a­bly plan ten or fif­teen years ahead for the smart­phone, and think about every­thing that they would have to learn and accom­plish to get there, we can begin to think about how we would learn and plan ahead for resilient, decen­tral­ized, zero car­bon, neg­a­tive car­bon soci­ety that we could poten­tial­ly recre­ate in ten or fif­teen years, twen­ty years, thir­ty years. And we know a lot of the tech­nol­o­gy is already available.

So that’s kind of the basic the­sis that I’m work­ing with. Sort of see­ing if we can use the cri­sis as an oppor­tu­ni­ty for human­i­ty to make a shift from a destruc­tive path to a regen­er­a­tive one. And I real­ly love the idea of a regen­er­a­tive cul­ture, regen­er­a­tive soci­ety, as a deep­er way of think­ing about it than sim­ply sus­tain­abil­i­ty, which sug­gests the idea that we’re going to sus­tain the old sys­tem, when actu­al­ly that old sys­tem is exact­ly what can’t be sus­tained anymore.

From this mod­el, this par­a­digm, I think it’s also inter­est­ing to think about, well if human­i­ty is emerg­ing into the state of being a super­or­gan­ism, then what are the the nascent organs of that col­lec­tive body? And I think strange­ly enough they’re actu­al­ly multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions. Like, an ener­gy com­pa­ny is kind of like the the blood cir­cu­lat­ing through the body. A san­i­ta­tion com­pa­ny is like the liv­er or the kid­ney that’s break­ing down tox­ins. Media com­pa­nies, social tech­nol­o­gy com­pa­nies, are very much like the per­cep­tu­al mech­a­nisms which are con­vert­ing the raw data of sense per­cep­tion into memes, into usable chunks for the for the col­lec­tive body. 

But unfor­tu­nate­ly, where we are now, it’s all hap­pen­ing in this par­a­digm of fear, inse­cu­ri­ty, neg­a­tiv­i­ty. The medi­a’s basi­cal­ly pro­gram­ming the col­lec­tive body of human­i­ty to not be aware of what’s hap­pen­ing and what’s fac­ing us, and how we need to change. So we have that oppor­tu­ni­ty to make that shift. And I think if we think about the pos­si­bil­i­ty that cor­po­ra­tions are these kind of nascent organs that are still in this kind of imma­ture stage of com­pe­ti­tion, we can begin to think about what would be the next iter­a­tion of those struc­tures. They would almost become some­thing like trans­par­ent infra­struc­tures that would be shar­ing knowl­edge and ideas freely, that would be sup­port­ing the health of the entire organ­ism, just as the organs of our body [are] able to do.

So, that’s my time. It was­n’t very much. And it was very won­der­ful to talk to you. And come next door. I’ll answer any ques­tions. We can chat. Thank you so much.

Further Reference

The OuiShare Fest 2016 site.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.