Frank Knight: It’s time for the Longines Chronoscope, a tele­vi­sion jour­nal of the impor­tant issues of the hour. Brought to you every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A pre­sen­ta­tion of the Longines-Wittnauer Watch Company, mak­er of Longines, the world’s most hon­ored watch. And Wittnauer, dis­tin­guished com­pan­ion to the world hon­ored Longines.


Good evening. This is Frank Knight. May I intro­duce our coed­i­tors for this edi­tion of the Longines Chronoscope, Mr. William Bradford Huie, edi­tor of the American Mercury, and Mr. Henry Hazlitt, con­tribut­ing edi­tor of Newsweek mag­a­zine. Our dis­tin­guished guest for this evening is the hon­or­able Joseph R. McCarthy, United States Senator from Wisconsin. The opin­ions expressed are nec­es­sar­i­ly those of the speak­ers.

William Bradford Huie: Senator McCarthy, our view­ers of course know that you are one of the most con­tro­ver­sial polit­i­cal fig­ures of our time, and this is your first appear­ance since your rather over­whelm­ing vic­to­ry in the Wisconsin pri­maries. Now sir, what that brings you East at this time?

Joseph R. McCarthy: Your pro­gram large­ly, Mr. Huie.

Huie: And I believe that also this week, you expect to make an address in Connecticut. Is that cor­rect, sir?

McCarthy: I’m speak­ing tomor­row night at the Klein Memorial Hall at Bridgeport, Connecticut.

Huie: And of course our view­ers know that day in Connecticut, that’s the home state of a man that you had a few words with, Senator Bill Benton. Now sir, what’s the pur­pose of your going into Connecticut? Is it to defeat Senator Benton or to try to help defeat Senator Benton?

McCarthy: My pur­pose, Mr. Huie, will be about the same as the pur­pose in some twelve, thir­teen states that I’ll vis­it. That’s to bring impor­tant facts to the American peo­ple. You see, I’ve got a very strong feel­ing that most of our peo­ple in pub­lic life under­es­ti­mate the intel­li­gence of the American peo­ple. And they try to argue and tell peo­ple how to vote. I think you need mere­ly give the peo­ple the facts, and then you can go home and don’t wor­ry. They’ll vote right.

Huie: Now at Bridgeport, Connecticut do I under­stand you cor­rect when you say that you are open­ing a twelve or thir­teen state dri­ve now, in sup­port of the nation­al tick­et?

McCarthy: I think I’ll be in… I may be wrong in the num­ber, Mr. Huie. I think that I am now sched­uled to speak in some thir­teen or four­teen states where they have close sen­a­to­r­i­al con­tests.

Henry Hazlitt: Senator, a lot of peo­ple came into your state, into Wisconsin, to try to defeat you in the pri­maries. And it seemed to have worked the oth­er way. Now don’t you think that per­haps when you go into these states it may have that’s sort of effect?

McCarthy: [pro­nounc­ing with a hard a] Well Mr. Hazlitt… That’s pro­nounced Hazlitt, right?

Hazlitt: That’s right.

McCarthy: I’m sor­ry. Mr. Hazlitt, I do not intend to go into those states and tell the peo­ple how to vote. I don’t intend to go in and dis­cuss the local men run­ning for Congress or for Senator. I intend to go into those states and give the American peo­ple the cold, doc­u­ment­ed pic­ture of the sell­out in Korea, the extent to which com­mu­nism has been direct­ing our for­eign pol­i­cy. Our sui­ci­dal for­eign pol­i­cy, if you please. And if the American peo­ple want more of that, then they can vote for the present admin­is­tra­tion.

I may say this, that my appeal is large­ly made to Democrats. I feel that the mil­lions of Americans who have long vot­ed the Democrat tick­et are just as loy­al, they love America just as much, they hate com­mu­nism just as much, as the aver­age Republican. And I think it is up to those loy­al Democrats to real­ize that as of today they don’t have a par­ty in Washington. The only way they can have a change is by vot­ing Republican.

Hazlitt: Well, do you think about a lot of Democrats came in and vot­ed for you in the Wisconsin elec­tion?

McCarthy: I don’t think it, I know it. Our nor­mal— Let’s put it this way. Two years ago, the Democratic vote was about 47% of the total; Republican vote 53%. This year we had a… Let’s see, I think these fig­ures are right. Eighty-three per­cent Republican vote; 17% Democrat vote. And most of the Democrats cur­rent­ly vot­ed for McCarthy, because I car­ried the Democrat wards nor­mal­ly bet­ter than I car­ried the Republican wards. Which proves my con­tention. That is that in this fight against com­mu­nism, it isn’t a Democrat fight, it isn’t a Republican fight. And for that rea­son I don’t go into any state and tell the peo­ple how to vote.

Hazlitt: What is the broad­er inter­pre­ta­tion of your own vic­to­ry in Wisconsin, as you see it?

McCarthy: Well I would say, Mr. Hazlitt, num­ber one it was not a vote for McCarthy. It was a vote on an issue, an all-important issue. The American peo­ple rec­og­nized that the one real issue, not the pho­ny issue, was the issue of com­mu­nism, cor­rup­tion, all tied up with the Korean War. And World War…call it two and a half, call it a police action, call it what you may. It means that the American peo­ple are sick way down deep inside at what’s been going on. And I’d like to con­sid­er it a trib­ute to McCarthy. But it does not—it was a vote upon on an all-important issue, and I just hope that many of our good friends real­ize that that is the issue this year.

Huie: But you imply, Senator, by say­ing that they didn’t vote for McCarthy— You imply that you’ve become some­thing of a sym­bol now to a large group of Americans. Now, just what do you believe you sym­bol­ize in the American polit­i­cal scene now?

McCarthy: I don’t quite like the way you put that ques­tion, Mr. Huie. Let’s put it this way. Many peo­ple have been wait­ing for some­one to expose the extent to which our sui­ci­dal for­eign pol­i­cy has been dic­tat­ed from the Kremlin. They’ve been wait­ing for some­one to real­ly get up and fight cor­rup­tion the way men like Senator Williams have fought it. And I think my peo­ple in Wisconsin were vot­ing in approval of a fight against com­mu­nism, cor­rup­tion, the sell­out of American inter­ests. And they weren’t vot­ing for Joe McCarthy.

McCarthy: I hap­pen to be the recip­i­ent of the vote, and I cer­tain­ly appre­ci­ate it a great deal.

Huie: Well, would you say the oth­er side of that coin is that you were the recip­i­ent of all the protest vote in Wisconsin? I mean that they were vot­ing for you in order to protest against what what you out­line have been the fail­ures of the admin­is­tra­tion.

McCarthy: That might well be, Mr. Huie.

Hazlitt: Senator, I want­ed to ask you about this word McCarthyism.” Am I right in sup­pos­ing that the first one who used that word was Owen Lattimore in tes­ti­mo­ny before the Tydings com­mit­tee?

McCarthy: Owen Lattimore first used it— Let me me cor­rect myself. I think it was first used by Lattimore or by The Daily Worker, but the tes­ti­mo­ny now is that forty top com­mu­nists met in New York and decid­ed how they would fight McCarthy and they then coined the phrase McCarthyism. Now as to the date of that, whether that was the day before Lattimore tes­ti­fied or the day after I frankly don’t know.

Hazlitt: But that’s the ori­gin, as you see it. Either The Daily Worker’s pub­li­ca­tion of it or the Owen Lattimore tes­ti­mo­ny was the first time it was used.

McCarthy: Yes. Or the tes­ti­mo­ny by Howard Rushmore that forty com­mu­nists met and said we’ll coin the phrase McCarthyism and use that.

Hazlitt: I want­ed to ask you here some­thing about a point that came up in the Congressional tes­ti­mo­ny about the Institute of Pacific Relations. This was about a year ago. And it was a let­ter writ­ten by the Secretary of the IPR to a Mr. Barnett, ask­ing about a meet­ing they were going to have at Mont-Tremblant and the peo­ple that they ought to invite to that meet­ing. And William Lockwood says here in writ­ing as Secretary of the IPR, Another pos­si­bil­i­ty we might con­sid­er is some­one from Knox’ office or Stimson’s. Cole and Hiss,” mean­ing Alger Hiss, men­tioned Adlai Stevens, one of Knox’s spe­cial assis­tants—” Well, that must mean Adlai Stevenson, because he was one of Knox’s spe­cial assis­tants then and there was no Stevens.” Now why, in your opin­ion, would Hiss back in 1942 have rec­om­mend­ed Adlai Stevenson as a par­tic­i­pant in that meet­ing? What qual­i­fi­ca­tions did Adlai Stevenson have as let’s say a Far-eastern expert at that time?

McCarthy: Well, all the qual­i­fi­ca­tions that Alger Hiss want­ed in a man, I would say. And keep in mind that Cole, the oth­er man rec­om­mend­ed by Alger Hiss, has been named under oath sev­en time as either a com­mu­nist or an espi­onage agent.

Huie: Uh, Senator…

McCarthy: Let me say this. I’d rather not go into Stevenson’s record in too great detail at this time, because we have just com­plet­ed a com­plete and thor­ough research on Adlai Stevenson.

Hazlitt: Who is we?”

McCarthy: Well… And I intend to give that pic­ture on a nation­wide net­work, and tele­vi­sion I hope also. And after I give that pic­ture of Stevenson, which isn’t a pic­ture that I have cre­at­ed, it’s his own history—it’s Adlai Stevenson’s his­to­ry of Adlai Stevenson since the time he entered the Agriculture Department in 1933, from Alger Hiss and [inaudi­ble] the rest. And after I give that his­to­ry of Stevenson, if the American peo­ple want him they can have him. I don’t think they’ll want him.

Huie: Well Senator, I gath­er from what you say that it’s fair to infer that you will not avoid per­son­al­i­ties in your thir­teen states that you expect to speak in.

McCarthy: I will nev­er avoid giv­ing the facts to the American peo­ple, Mr. Huie. It’s so easy, you see, to talk about com­mu­nism gen­er­al­ly. To talk about the sell­out in China and Korea gen­er­al­ly. But unless you call the role of the trai­tors, unless you call the role of those who have been respon­si­ble for the sui­ci­dal for­eign pol­i­cy, it’s a waste of the speaker’s time and the audi­ence time. And I don’t intend to ever get up and in gen­er­al terms talk about trea­son, talk about sell­outs. You see, for­eign pol­i­cy isn’t like Little Topsy, it doesn’t just grow. Treason isn’t like Little Topsy, it doesn’t just grow. It’s cre­at­ed by men with faces and men with names. And I think those of us who’ve been elect­ed by the American peo­ple to man the watch­tow­ers, unless we have the intel­li­gence to rec­og­nize the trai­tors and then—if I may use a word which we use in Wisconsin—unless we have the guts to name them, we should be tak­en down from those watch­tow­ers and should not be rep­re­sent­ing the American peo­ple. And I don’t intend to ever avoid giv­ing the names of trai­tors, giv­ing the names of com­mu­nists, if I dis­cov­er them in impor­tant posi­tions.

Hazlitt: Well Senator, we appre­ci­ate it very much for your being with us tonight.

McCarthy: Well, thank you, Mr. Hazlitt.

Knight: The edi­to­r­i­al board for this edi­tion of the Longines Chronoscope was Mr. William Bradford Huie and Mr. Henry Hazlitt. Our dis­tin­guished guest was the hon­or­able Joseph R. McCarthy, United States Senator from Wisconsin.


Frank Knight: It’s World Series time again, the best days of the year for base­ball fans. And this year again, the World Series is Longines time. Yes, all umpires of both American and National base­ball leagues use Longines watch­es exclu­sive­ly for tim­ing all the games, includ­ing the World Series. Truly the most hon­ored watch in the world of sport is Longines, the world’s most hon­ored watch. The only watch in his­to­ry to win ten World’s Fair grant prizes, twenty-eight gold medals, and so many hon­ors for accu­ra­cy in fields of pre­cise tim­ing.

Now that’s why, through­out the world, no oth­er name on a watch car­ries the pres­tige of Longines, the world’s most hon­ored watch in sports. The watch of first choice with dis­crim­i­nat­ing peo­ple the world over. And yet you know that you made by and own, or buy and proud­ly give, a Longines watch for as lit­tle as $71.50. Longines, the world’s most hon­ored watch. Premier prod­uct of the Longines-Wittnauer Watch Company, since 1866 mak­er of watch­es of the high­est char­ac­ter.

We invite you to join us every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday evening at this same time for the Longines Chronoscope, a tele­vi­sion jour­nal of the impor­tant issues of the hour. Broadcast on behalf of Longines, the world’s most hon­ored watch, and Wittnauer, dis­tin­guished com­pan­ion to the world hon­ored Longines.

This is Frank Knight. Reminding you that Longines and Wittnauer watch­es are sold and ser­viced from coast to cost by more than 4,000 lead­ing jew­el­ers who proud­ly dis­play this emblem, agency for Longines-Wittnauer watch­es.”


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.