John Gray: Whatever human beings do changes the world. The ques­tion is whether projects which are for­mu­lat­ed to change the world in cer­tain spe­cif­ic ways can suc­ceed. And one of the prob­lems here, of course, is that there’s no we.” Who’s we? I mean, humanity’s composed—the human species is composed—of bil­lions of sep­a­rate indi­vid­u­als with dif­fer­ent goals, dif­fer­ent plans, dif­fer­ent val­ues, and dif­fer­ent ideals. So, yes they can all change the world but not in the way that they anticipate.

Eveline van der Ham: And do you think that they change the we?

Gray: The we changes all the time, but there’ll nev­er be a uni­ver­sal we. There nev­er has been a uni­ver­sal we, and there nev­er will be a uni­ver­sal we because human beings, although they have many things in com­mon, have—each of them as well as tak­ing them sep­a­rate­ly or collectively—have con­flict­ing goals and pur­pos­es. So there can’t be a we which has the same pur­pos­es, because even in a sin­gle indi­vid­ual, pur­pos­es and val­ues con­flict with each other.

Van der Ham: Now, you are famous for crit­i­ciz­ing beliefs.

Gray: Yes.

Van der Ham: But what do you believe yourself?

Gray: I try to avoid beliefs. We need to have beliefs in con­texts such as med­i­cine or the crim­i­nal law. We try to get the best beliefs we can based on the evi­dence. We all have beliefs about fac­tu­al states of the world. And we even have gen­er­al views of what human beings are like and how human his­to­ry is developing. 

But I think the depen­den­cy on beliefs, the idea that a set of beliefs or a sys­tem of beliefs can some­how pro­vide mean­ing to human life, is a mis­take. So I think we should econ­o­mize on beliefs and do with as few as pos­si­ble. Make them as sim­ple as pos­si­ble and as few as pos­si­ble, and the ones that we have, we should be ready when they con­cern mat­ters of fact in the world—when they con­cern pol­i­tics, for example—we should be ready to sur­ren­der them, give them up, when the world changes.

So I think one of the great errors of the last hun­dred or two hun­dred years is to for­mu­late a sys­tem of polit­i­cal beliefs which is not revis­able by expe­ri­ence. So that if you have a project, such as com­mu­nism or uni­ver­sal democ­ra­cy or the European project, and it doesn’t work out, rather than revis­ing the beliefs about the project, what peo­ple tend to do is to say well, if we try twice as hard, or if we change the cir­cum­stances, or if we’re more enthu­si­as­tic, or more com­mit­ment, of if there’s a larg­er we, or a more har­mo­nious we, we can achieve it. That’s near­ly always an illu­sion. It would be bet­ter to revise the beliefs.

Van der Ham: So, dur­ing your life, have you giv­en up on beliefs?

Gray: No. No, because I didn’t have any to start with of that kind. For me pol­i­tics is a series of tem­po­rary reme­dies for recur­ring human evils. Politics doesn’t con­sist of a sys­tem of uni­ver­sal prin­ci­ples or of any kind of uni­ver­sal project. It’s sim­ply a series of tem­po­rary, pro­vi­sion­al, par­tial, reme­dies for recur­ring dif­fi­cul­ties or evils. So, Thatcherism was nec­es­sary in…I believe in the late 70s, 80s, and 90s. But it last­ed thir­ty years. It achieved some use­ful goals. But it’s no longer work­able. We need some­thing dif­fer­ent. That’s normal. 

But one of the prob­lems of the late 20th cen­tu­ry and even ear­ly 21st cen­tu­ry think­ing about pol­i­tics is that there is an assump­tion that there is a sin­gle project, or a sin­gle strat­e­gy, or a sin­gle set of respons­es that can always work. Universal democ­ra­cy, human rights, a European project, or some­thing of that kind. All of these should be seen as tem­po­rary expe­di­ents for dimin­ish­ing or reduc­ing human evils such as pover­ty, or tor­ture, or per­se­cu­tion, or geno­cide. There are dif­fer­ent ways of stop­ping or reduc­ing these evils. And if you fix­ate on one, you’ll will nor­mal­ly come soon­er or lat­er to failure. 

Further Reference

How to Change the World?, the 2012 Nexus Conference event page


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.