Ingrid Burrington: Hi, every­one. Thank you for com­ing. It’s real­ly hum­bling to be here, and thank you Addie for invit­ing me. 

So, hi. My name is Ingrid. I’ve been using, a lot of times, as my one-liner artist state­ment that I make maps and tell jokes. Which is to say I think a lot about pow­er, giv­en that maps and jokes are tremen­dous instru­ments for exer­cis­ing, explain­ing, and chal­leng­ing pow­er. And I’m going to just be talk­ing about some work that I’ve been doing for the last eigh­teen months that start­ed with what I think of as an image prob­lem. When sto­ries about online and phone-based mass sur­veil­lance start­ed rolling out, the stock pho­tog­ra­phy was real­ly weak. And the images all seemed to not real­ly cap­ture, to me, what we were actu­al­ly see­ing hap­pen. There were a lot of white dudes look­ing at screens and a lot of blue-filter, Eye of Sauron shit. And part of this prob­lem is that it’s an abstract thing, right? But the oth­er part is that the parts that aren’t abstract, like the actu­al places where sur­veil­lance takes place, the kinds of images that you can even get are sort of limited. 

From video @1:24

From video @1:24

This is prob­a­bly one of my favorite pho­tos I’ve ever tak­en. It’s at a park next to the NSA. It’s for famous fall­en spy planes, and not only does it have a list of things you should­n’t take a pic­ture of, it has a pic­ture of the kind of pic­ture you can’t have. So not only does the NSA have real­ly strict rules about what kinds of images can be put out about it—there’s like that one famous stock pho­to and then [Caitlin?] made anoth­er one—they also have con­trol over an image that is impos­si­ble to create. 

From video @2:09

And then one of the oth­er things like that Eye of Sauron clip art thing I think does is it amps up the mys­tique fac­tor, and I think kind of adds to this idea that these insti­tu­tions are impen­e­tra­ble. This is a mousepad that I bought at the Cryptology Museum next door to the NSA, and um, they can’t sum­mon light­ning. This stuff, I think it kind of feeds into a cul­ture of fear around this stuff. And I’m real­ly into expos­ing the banal­i­ty of pow­er, the way in which a lot of these things that are kind of sen­sa­tion­al­ized or ter­ri­fy­ing are real­ly just white dudes in sub­ur­ban office parks. And I start­ed with look­ing a lot at one par­tic­u­lar office park.

From video @2:43

From video @2:43

So this map, down at the bot­tom, that’s the NSA. And then a lit­tle fur­ther to the top and to the left, that is an office park that I first start­ed notic­ing. I went down to Fort Meade for Chelsea Manning’s tri­al and was just look­ing around at things that were in the area and saw all these defense con­trac­tors in this office park and was like, That’s…inevitable.” It turns out this prop­er­ty, which is called The National Business Park, is owned by a real estate invest­ment trust called Corporate Office Properties Trust, and their entire busi­ness strat­e­gy appears to be buy land next to major defense out­posts, and build offices for defense con­trac­tors and the gov­ern­ment.” Which is actu­al­ly a pret­ty smart busi­ness strat­e­gy if you’re a real estate company.

From video @4:00

From video @4:00

This to me, this is where sur­veil­lance actu­al­ly hap­pens. So much of the work that is being done by the gov­ern­ment is actu­al­ly being done by third par­ties, and it’s a very lucra­tive busi­ness. So I went to this office park and kind of just walked around it, and it’s bor­ing. It’s real­ly kind of weird and bor­ing and it’s weird to think about the fact that these com­pa­nies that are enor­mous and involved in pret­ty unseem­ly shit appear like this, like this kind of crap­py build­ing with this kind of crap­py pub­lic art. And at the same time, there’s all these sort of lit­tle hints to what is actu­al­ly there. Like, there are cer­tain roads that you can’t real­ly go much fur­ther past on with­out need­ing to show spe­cif­ic kinds of ID

I was inter­est­ed in try­ing to use that spe­cif­ic land­scape and maps of it as a way to see how the military-industrial com­plex has become increas­ing­ly pri­va­tized, so I start­ed look­ing at Landsat satel­lite imagery. So this is an image of that office park in 2002.

National Business Park 2002

National Business Park 2002

That was the old­est one that I could find. It’s kind of tiled togeth­er. So there’s a cou­ple build­ings there; they’re cur­rent­ly doing okay. This is 2006.

National Business Park, 2006

National Business Park, 2006

It’s not a per­fect tran­si­tion, but you can see there are at least a few more build­ings. By then there’s about eight new build­ings that’ve been added to this. What hap­pened between 2002 and 2006? The obvi­ous one is that we invad­ed Iraq, but the oth­er one in 2002 was Project Trailblazer was start­ed. I don’t know how many peo­ple here are famil­iar with Project Trailblazer. It was a giant infor­ma­tion sur­veil­lance pro­gram that was con­tract­ed out to (I have to always write this down) SAIC, Boeing, CSC, and Booz Allen Hamilton. It was a com­plete boon­dog­gle. And this was the project that a num­ber of whistle­blow­ers inside the Department of Defense brought to the Inspector General because the NSA could’ve built it them­selves for a lot less mon­ey. And this is why Thomas Drake was indict­ed for the Espionage Act.

National Business Park 2012

National Business Park 2012

This is the prop­er­ty in 2012. There’s anoth­er mil­lion square feet that’s been added since 2006, there’s nine more build­ings. So this is a very small but very inter­est­ing illus­tra­tion to me of the fact that the military-industrial com­plex isn’t just weapons or mal­ware, it’s real estate. It’s prop­er­ty, it’s bod­ies, it’s humans. 

One of the things that I thought was super-interesting as I start­ed look­ing into this par­tic­u­lar real estate com­pa­ny was that they had start­ed this busi­ness piv­ot to run­ning data cen­ters. Which of course is extreme­ly smart. But it led me, in try­ing to go see their data cen­ters and oth­er data cen­ters, into this kind of mis­lead­ing­ly banal ques­tion, which is How do you see the Internet?” And I guess this is how most of us see the Internet, like we’re inter­fac­ing with it: 


But when you try to actu­al­ly explain to some­one what the Internet is, or how to com­pre­hend it, you get a lot of real­ly abstract net­work dia­grams and real­ly mis­lead­ing metaphors and clip art. (Don’t get me start­ed on the cloud.) Cuz like, this is the cloud:

The Cloud

The (Amazon) Cloud

This is an Amazon data cen­ter in Northern Virginia and it’s not call­ing atten­tion to itself. It’s kind of a cru­cial piece of infra­struc­ture, and it’s some­thing that you would nev­er real­ly even real­ly notice.

So at this point in the year I start­ed to get real­ly obsessed with net­work infra­struc­ture. This is what hap­pens when you start talk­ing to peo­ple about net­work infra­struc­ture, I have learned.


And I com­plete­ly under­stand why, because it’s some­thing that was sort of designed to be ignored. You real­ly only notice infra­struc­ture when it stops work­ing. We can get into whether there is some­thing about the Internet that is no longer work­ing per­haps lat­er. I should prob­a­bly just move on to a lit­tle more of methods.

So it turns out if you want maps of where fiber lines are and want to get a bet­ter sense of data cen­ter geog­ra­phy, peo­ple won’t just tell you. So I kind of had to fig­ure it out myself. And I start­ed out real­ly small. I just want­ed to fig­ure out how can I see the Internet with­in one city block around me, like walk­ing down the street in Manhattan?” Turns out a real­ly good way to do that is to look down.

Spray-painted markings indicating utility locations

Spray-painted mark­ings indi­cat­ing util­i­ty locations

I imag­ine you’ve seen things like this before walk­ing down the street, like spray paint on inter­sec­tions and streets. This is stuff that’s put down on the street pri­or to street exca­va­tion work, and it’s basi­cal­ly a way for peo­ple doing that work to know what’s around them, so that if they’re going to be doing work on a gas line they don’t acci­den­tal­ly cut the pow­er to an entire neighborhood.

They’re all color-coded, there’s an inter­na­tion­al stan­dard for this. And all the orange ones are telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions. That includes tele­phone and TV and well as inter­net. But once you start look­ing for these, you real­ly can’t not see them. I kind of start­ed to think of them like The Crying of Lot 49, like you could just find the postal horn every­where. And there’s some fun things you can do with this, so like this is a weird way to kind of reverse engi­neer where cer­tain fiber lines are.

From video @8:59

From video @8:59

These are two lines that are run­ning out of 111 8th Ave, which is a major car­ri­er hotel, into 85 10th Ave., which has a Level 3 colo­ca­tion cen­ter. (Fun fact: also home to the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force offices. IDK

From video @9:47

From video @9:47

But that’s a very tedious way to work through that prob­lem, to try and walk through the entire city, fol­low­ing orange lines, and even­tu­al­ly I’m going to get hit by a bus. So the oth­er way that I’ve been approach­ing this prob­lem is by work­ing on a field guide, so that any­one can fig­ure out what these things are, and what they’re look­ing at, and see the Internet on the street. And this is going to be print­ed in January. It’s also a weird way to get in a lot of side­ways infor­ma­tion about the pol­i­tics of net­work infra­struc­ture. In this slide there’s an aside about dark fiber. What is it? Why do all these ISPs have it? Why do they sell it for so much mon­ey to banks? A ver­sion of this also exists on-line, so I’m a lit­tle more into the idea of a hand-held expe­ri­ence with it. But if you’re inter­est­ed, it’s out there.

One of the things that a lot of this work has made me think a lot about is scale. There was a time com­put­ers used to be the size of an entire room to func­tion. And while we’ve been able to make hard­ware that is small­er, I believe that the room has sim­ply got­ten big­ger, to about the size of the plan­et. We’re sur­round­ed by sen­sors every­where, and a lot of them are fair­ly mun­dane, and a lot of them we can kind of eas­i­ly for­get about and have been there for a long time. I think some­times I get a lit­tle side-eye at the hype over the Internet of Things because we’ve had this shit around for a while. And then there’s ele­ments of it that’s kind of insid­i­ous and is kind of work­ing as pri­vate net­works that we can’t real­ly under­stand and that are increas­ing­ly actu­al­ly on human bodies.

This next slide [screen­shot of this arti­cle] is going to seem like a detour, but it’s actu­al­ly just tak­ing the scenic route to a relat­ed point, so bear with me. This is a small project that I fin­ished very recent­ly and is kind of relat­ed to what I’m try­ing to work on next while I’m here this week. A cou­ple of weeks ago, a German news­pa­per released a sto­ry about GCHQs tap­ping of some sub­ma­rine cables, the cables that con­nect ocean Internets to each oth­er. And this was­n’t new, like peo­ple had known that they were doing it, but this was the first arti­cle that released a doc­u­ment that had a list of exact­ly which cables, which hap­pens to be pret­ty easy to find pub­lic infor­ma­tion, like just the exis­tence of where cables are. Telegeography main­tains a real­ly nice data set about them. 

So I just kind of mashed those togeth­er and made a map of which cables are being tapped and which ones aren’t, and which pro­grams they’re asso­ci­at­ed with, and which com­pa­nies own those cables because that can also give you a sense of what these code­name pro­grams, who the part­ner asso­ci­a­tions affil­i­at­ed with them are. 

Our Command & Control Networks are tru­ly being trans­formed into a WEAPON SYSTEM as they get lever­aged more and more by our sol­diers — and as such, need to be pro­tect­ed from the increas­ing focus and efforts of our ene­mies to attack them using any & all means…
Defense Information Systems Agency NetOps Strategic Plan 2006

This was a quote from a Department of Defense doc­u­ment that was essen­tial­ly mak­ing the argu­ment that com­mu­ni­ca­tion net­works are weapons sys­tems. Literally, not like they’re a means to an end, they were basi­cal­ly like, Communications sys­tems are weapons.” And to me this illus­trates a cer­tain urgency for why you might want to care about infra­struc­ture, and might want to know about fiber lines beneath your feet, because they have been weaponized. They have been mil­i­ta­rized. And it would be cool if we could make them less that. And what I’ve been think­ing a lot about this week is how to fol­low a thread that con­nects you from the mas­sive military-industrial net­works that are cap­tur­ing infor­ma­tion and sep­a­rat­ing net­works all the time. 

This is a 2004 map of the SIPRNet, which is the Secure Information Protocol Routing Network; it’s the Department of Defense’s pri­vate clas­si­fied net­work that spans a huge amount of the world. Connecting this to police depart­ments that now are able to col­lect cell phone data of pro­test­ers. There is a link that is bring­ing things from this real­ly high lev­el, from sub­ma­rine cables, down to the street, back to that inter­sec­tion where you’re just try­ing to find the Internet.

I don’t total­ly know what that looks like, and I’m hop­ing to fig­ure it out, and I don’t want to think of it as a demor­al­iz­ing point. I think it’s a chal­lenge that has to be tak­en on and is worth tak­ing on. Thank you very much.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.