Lisa Rein: Thank you very much. This will be the last talk of the evening, and I real­ly appre­ci­ate every­body com­ing out and if my heart beats any faster it’s going to take this build­ing down.

First a few words about Chelsea. Things that I cer­tain­ly did­n’t know until a few weeks ago. And now a few words from a very brave per­son who unfor­tu­nate­ly can’t be here in per­son or even remote­ly tonight. That per­son is Chelsea E. Manning, who is serv­ing thirty-five years at the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas. Technically, she’s eli­gi­ble for parole in 2020.

Like Aaron, Chelsea is a mem­ber of a gen­er­a­tion of pro­gram­mers that grew up using com­put­ers. Chelsea was born just about a year after Aaron, and she was pro­gram­ming at age 7, although she is quick to clar­i­fy that she real­ly did­n’t know what she was doing until she was 9 or 10. She remem­bers the day she cre­at­ed her first web page in 1997, when she was 10, using HTML 3.0. She also remem­bers the launch of Creative Commons in 2002 when she was almost 15, and she was great­ly influ­enced by Richard Stallman’s book Free as in Freedom.

Chelsea Manning would be here tonight if she could, but hope­ful­ly some­day she will be here in per­son with all of us in a huge cel­e­bra­tion of jus­tice that hope­ful­ly she will one day be the recip­i­ent of. I will now read her statement.

The Human Element

This is a state­ment for Aaron Swartz Day and International Hackathon 2015, enti­tled The Human Element.”

Hello, every­one. First I’d like to apol­o­gize for the awk­ward­ness of this writ­ten medi­um. I would love to speak in per­son as well as attend and con­tribute to events like these, but cer­tain cir­cum­stances are com­pli­cat­ing my abil­i­ty to trav­el and com­mu­ni­cate in any fash­ion rec­og­niz­able to most of us in the 21st cen­tu­ry. In fact, see­ing that this is a tech­nol­o­gy event, I’d like to talk about the incred­i­ble ubiq­ui­ty and access that soci­ety now has to highly-connected infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy devices.

It seems to me at least that as we enter the era of ubiq­ui­tous com­put­ing, the so-called Internet of Things, with cell phones hug­ging against our hips, lap­tops and tablets in every­one’s bag, and toast­ers that have the uncan­ny abil­i­ty to sort our music libraries in the wrong way, and hav­ing com­fort­able con­ver­sa­tions with our grumpy selves in the morn­ing, we have begun to blur the lines with­in our human soci­ety in unex­pect­ed and even excit­ing ways.

Looking at the rapid advances in our social and polit­i­cal sphere in the infor­ma­tion era such as cul­tur­al progress, queer and trans move­ments have start­ed to make, the rela­tion­ships between such things as gen­der and sex­u­al­i­ty, between art and work, between gen­der and work, and between sex­u­al­i­ty and art, have blurred in incred­i­ble ways. 

Now there are ele­ments and ideas which seem to imple­ment the con­cept of tran­shu­man­ism, and it’s becom­ing nor­mal for more and more peo­ple who antic­i­pate as well as fear the eco­nom­ic, infor­ma­tion, and tech­no­log­i­cal sin­gu­lar­i­ty at the sup­posed end of our expo­nen­tial graphs in our own lifetimes.

But con­sid­er the para­dox that tech­nol­o­gy has pro­vid­ed for us. We seem more diverse and open as a soci­ety, but isn’t it also the case that we are more homo­ge­neous and inse­cure than we ever have been in the last cen­tu­ry or so? You might try and tell me some­thing like, Well, today’s tools pro­vide us with the abil­i­ty to be more inde­pen­dent from the con­trol of our gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions than ever before.” But I ask, do they really?

I don’t think very many peo­ple in here are con­vinced that tech­nol­o­gy is a pure­ly lib­er­at­ing tool. As we are now see­ing that it can also be used to cen­sor, to con­trol, to mon­i­tor, to antic­i­pate, to imprison, and some­times even kill. I am argu­ing that we can be inde­pen­dent and lib­er­at­ed as a soci­ety even with­out advanced tech­nol­o­gy. It seems that some peo­ple today even find their inde­pen­dence by embrac­ing the Luddite phi­los­o­phy, ditch­ing their cell phones for the week­ends, or avoid­ing the Internet at cer­tain times of the day or week.

But I hope you don’t think that you have to run to the hills of Montana and live in a cab­in for years on end. That seems a lit­tle dis­pro­por­tion­ate, ha ha. Today, as is obvi­ous in some of the head­lines that we see online, we are in a con­stant tech­no­log­i­cal arms race, and I think that it’s impor­tant to real­ize that we are always only a sin­gle break­through away from mak­ing the meth­ods of net­work obfus­ca­tion and encryp­tion point­less or unus­able. While I agree that it is unlike­ly, it cer­tain­ly is with­in the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ty that we might wake up tomor­row morn­ing, or, if we’re real­ly hon­est tomor­row after­noon for some of us, and find out that some tru­ly bril­liant or devi­ous math­e­mati­cian or math­e­mati­cians have solved the Riemann Hypothesis, throw­ing entire regions of our encryp­tion arse­nal into tur­moil. Or, we might wake up and find out that a six, eight, or even ten qubit quan­tum com­put­er with near per­fect error-correction has been built, effec­tive­ly accom­plish­ing the same thing. 

The point I’m try­ing to make here (and it is some­times hard for those of us in the tech com­mu­ni­ty to accept) is that our tech­nol­o­gy can only take us so far on its own. Rather, it is the human ele­ment that is so impor­tant, and unfor­tu­nate­ly very easy to forget.

As most of us are acute­ly aware, our soft­ware can be writ­ten to accom­plish a task that, in the right hands, solves incred­i­ble prob­lems, cre­ates mir­a­cles, elim­i­nates bound­aries, and saves lives. Think about, for instance, the enter­tain­ment pro­vid­ed by stream­ing videos and video games, the real-time arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence appli­ca­tions that are used in auto­mat­ed cars, man­u­fac­tur­ing plants, and med­ical equip­ment, or the so called Big Data” plat­forms being applied for Internet search, mar­ket­ing, polit­i­cal cam­paign­ing, and healthcare.

Yet, that very same soft­ware, with a few minor tweaks can, in the wrong hands, cause immense prob­lems, cre­ate night­mares, raise insur­mount­able bound­aries, and destroy and even end lives. Think about how the same tech­nol­o­gy used in stream­ing video, video games, real-time com­mand and con­trols, and arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence, can also be used in unmanned air­craft armed with mis­siles to wreak hav­oc on bare­ly dis­cernible peo­ple hun­dreds or thou­sands of miles away. Think about the sta­tis­ti­cal nudges in big data algo­rithms that cre­ate gen­der, racial, eth­nic, gen­der iden­ti­ty, sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion, reli­gious, polit­i­cal, and oth­er bias­es across large swaths of the online pop­u­la­tion. Also, think about the inten­si­fy­ing polar­iza­tion and heavy focus on pre­ci­sion tar­get­ing on swing vot­ers in the polit­i­cal realm. Real peo­ple in real places in real time are affect­ed, some­times on an immense scale.

Software is only a tool. Technology is only a tool­box. It’s what we cre­ate our soft­ware for, and what we intend to use it for, and who we allow to use it, and how much, that real­ly count.

I now believe that today’s coders and engi­neers have an extra hat” that we have to wear on top of the col­or­ful spec­trum of hats we already have, name­ly the tech­nol­o­gy ethi­cist and moral­ist hat. Whether we’re ama­teurs or pro­fes­sion­als, and despite whether we want to or not, it has now become anoth­er duty that we have. I only hope that the major­i­ty of us can fig­ure out and ful­ly under­stand what that is going to entail as we approach the edge of our graphs. In fact, human lives and the future of human­i­ty may depend on it.

Thank you for your time every­one, and good luck in your endeav­ors. I would espe­cial­ly like to thank Lisa Rein for her love­ly let­ter last month invit­ing me to speak before you all. It was an incred­i­bly warm and heart­felt let­ter that made my day a lit­tle brighter.

Good night, everyone.

—Chelsea E. Manning

Lisa: I want to thank every­one at the Internet Archive. Like every year, they made this the best thing that it pos­si­bly could be, and thank you very much for com­ing. [record­ing skips]

Further Reference

The Aaron Swartz Day web site.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.