Rob Riemen: If we look at our first big ques­tion, What’s the defect of our civ­i­liza­tion?” which is a quote from Freud, from a philo­soph­i­cal per­spec­tive, or the­o­log­i­cal per­spec­tive, reli­gious peo­ple will argue, Well, there’s a thing called orig­i­nal sin.” There’s also a more enlight­ened or [inaudi­ble] per­spec­tive which will assume human nature. What is it that you would argue, con­cern­ing us human beings, that we appar­ent­ly do not learn the lessons, or that we can turn back into the more dark zone of human life?

Elif Şafak: Well, we do have cer­tain dual­i­ties in front of us that will become very impor­tant in the next decades. How do we deal with iden­ti­ty, iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics, dif­fer­ences? Unfortunately in today’s world, because there’s so much fear, there’s so much anx­i­ety— And I’m not belit­tling anx­i­ety, I’m an anx­ious per­son myself; how can I belit­tle oth­er peo­ples’ anx­i­eties? But anxiety’s some­thing we need to talk about. And when pol­i­tics is guid­ed by anx­i­ety, or fear, that’s very dan­ger­ous.

So one of the pri­ma­ry ques­tions, or prob­lems as I see it, is this illu­sion” that same­ness will bring safe­ty. People start to think­ing that if we are sur­round­ed by sim­i­lar peo­ple, like-minded peo­ple, if we have com­mu­ni­ties based on same­ness, that will bring us safe­ty. That’s an illu­sion. That’s not the case at all. We are far too glob­al­ized. So what is hap­pen­ing in one part of the world affects some­one in a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent part of the world. The unhap­pi­ness of one indi­vid­ual in Pakistan affects the life of some­one in Canada. This is the world we’re liv­ing in. So we do have to under­stand that we’re all in this togeth­er as glob­al souls, as world cit­i­zens, and we need to revive the ener­gy of human­ism and coex­is­tence.

How can we live togeth­er with our dif­fer­ences around shared, com­mon val­ues? For me, one of the main com­mon val­ues, one of them, is def­i­nite­ly democ­ra­cy. And def­i­nite­ly women’s rights. Because how can you have har­mo­ny and peace when half of the world is being pushed back into the pri­vate space? I see this every­where in the Middle East. In Turkey as well, but all around the Middle East, par­tic­u­lar­ly. More and more women are being remind­ed of their roles as moth­ers, care­tak­ers. More and more women are being pushed from the pub­lic space into the pri­vate space, into their homes. And there’s a huge imbal­ance, you know? All the mys­tics through­out the cen­turies have talked about the impor­tance of bal­ance. We have to bal­ance ener­gies. At the moment, I think the bal­ance between mas­cu­line ener­gy and fem­i­nine ener­gy is com­plete­ly bro­ken in many parts of the world. That too is a prob­lem for me.

Riemen: But isn’t also part of this that— I’m very glad that you bring up the mys­tics. They are unknown in our day’s world, and the peo­ple who speak most like­ly are intel­lec­tu­als, who are con­fus­ing people’s minds con­cern­ing same­ness and the revival of nation­al­ism. In London, you have Mr. Boris Johnson. You can make a long list of highly-educated intel­lec­tu­als who…are liars. It’s the phe­nom­e­non of the betray­al of the intel­lec­tu­als. How to deal with that? Where does the respon­si­bil­i­ty of intel­lec­tu­als come in our soci­ety, where they are not accept­ing their respon­si­bil­i­ty, worse when they are deceiv­ing peo­ple?

Şafak: I think we need to dif­fer­en­ti­ate two things. We can crit­i­cize the intel­li­gentsia, the literati, and that’s fair enough, but at the same time have a lot of respect for the intel­lect, and try to cul­ti­vate that. And this is what I see lack­ing. We don’t have enough intel­lec­tu­al plat­forms, where we see peo­ple from com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent back­grounds, dif­fer­ent cul­tur­al, eth­nic, back­grounds but also dif­fer­ent dis­ci­plines, come togeth­er, lis­ten to each oth­er. We have been far too com­part­men­tal­ized. And I see that as a prob­lem because we have things to learn from each oth­er. And I think the world right now needs more inter­dis­ci­pli­nary dia­logues, you know? 

So I do have a lot of respect for the intel­lect, and for the role of the intel­lec­tu­al, which is one of the inter­est­ing dilem­mas for me because in the UK the word intel­lec­tu­al doesn’t have very pos­i­tive con­no­ta­tions, as you know. But I think it’s impor­tant to com­ment on what’s hap­pen­ing in the world. It means that we care about it. And we need crit­i­cal minds. Societies can only move for­ward through crit­i­cal minds.

However, we should also bear in mind that there’s an amaz­ing bulk of lit­er­a­ture about neu­ro­science, the brain— We have defined the intel­lect in only one par­tic­u­lar way. That also needs to change. There are dif­fer­ent kinds of intel­lect. There’s emo­tion­al intel­li­gence as well, which we need to put into the pic­ture. And you can only cul­ti­vate that through sto­ries, sto­ry­telling, empa­thy, you know, the abil­i­ty to put your­self in the shoes of anoth­er per­son. That also needs to be in these intel­lec­tu­al plat­forms. So intel­lec­tu­al doesn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly mean one par­tic­u­lar way of look­ing at things through log­ic and rea­son. It can be done in very dif­fer­ent ways. 

Intuition is also very impor­tant. I think we have a lot to learn from ancient phi­los­o­phy. We have a lot to learn from each oth­er. Our read­ing lists need to be eclec­tic. We need to read from the East and the West, from peo­ple who are dif­fer­ent than us. And only that diver­si­ty is going to hope­ful­ly give us a new boost and a new ener­gy to move for­ward.

Further Reference

Nexus Conference 2016, "What Will Save the World?"


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.