Rob Riemen: Obama start­ed his pres­i­den­cy with say­ing you know, I’m the uni­fi­er [indis­tinct] Republicans, Democrats…the United States of America.” Apparently he was not that suc­cess­ful in break­ing the grid­lock. If you would have been President, how would you get a United States of America? How to do it, what’s the trick? 

Jeb Bush: Well first all, I don’t think Washington is the def­i­n­i­tion of who we are as a nation, for starters. And I think shift­ing pow­er away from Washington has to be part of the solu­tion to this. And where there’s much more engage­ment by peo­ple in hav­ing a say in their own lives. I mean, you can’t out­source this to an ever…you know, larg­er and larg­er gov­ern­ment and expect a good result. You have to assume that the peo­ple that dis­agree with you aren’t motivated…that they love the coun­try the same way. I have deep dis­agree­ments with Barack Obama, but I don’t think it… I think he loves the coun­try. And he’s just got a dif­fer­ent mind­set about how to go about it. And I think he’s wrong about that but I don’t ascribe bad motives to make my point better. 

And as President…look at Johnson after… I’ve been I’ve been crit­i­cized by telling this sto­ry because peo­ple take it out of con­text like some­how I’m a big believ­er in the lead­er­ship skills of Lyndon Johnson. But when John Kennedy was assas­si­nat­ed, in a six-week peri­od, he first got a bud­get that was passed that had a year-to-year decline in it; first time since World War II. And he did that by being all in and deal­ing with peo­ple that were not from his par­ty as well as Southern Democrats that con­trolled the bud­get process. Then he got the Civil Rights Bill passed. In a six week peri­od. Now part of it was the peo­ple felt you know, hor­ri­ble of the assas­si­na­tion of Kennedy. And he got the tax cut—the Kennedy tax cut is real­ly Lyndon Johnson’s doing. 

All of this hap­pened in a brief peri­od because there was com­plete engage­ment. He cajoled, he was active­ly engaged. He was­n’t pas­sive and removed. And he did­n’t ascribe bad motives or try to demo­nize peo­ple that ulti­mate­ly had to be part of the solu­tion, and he shared the cred­it. This is not the—

Sean Wilentz: It’s called politics.

Bush: Yeah! This is not the most com­pli­cat­ed thing in the world to do today. It seems like it’s almost impos­si­ble to do today, but there are thou­sands of exam­ples of this hap­pen­ing in city coun­cils with may­ors, and state leg­is­la­tors with gov­er­nors. And it can hap­pen again in Washington. To assume that it can’t hap­pen, that some­how it’s impos­si­ble for the log­i­cal way of get­ting to yes, that we just elim­i­nate that as a pos­si­bil­i­ty, we do it at our peril. 

Randall Kennedy: I want to pick up, though, on a point that you made ear­li­er which is in a way, would you say— What you just said about Lyndon Johnson’s all true…I have a lot of respect for Lyndon Johnson. The polit­i­cal cul­ture in which he was deal­ing, how­ev­er, was in many respects an eas­i­er one than any pres­i­dent would have to deal with today, and in part because of cer­tain demo­c­ra­t­ic achieve­ments. There were with respect to gen­der total­ly different…you know, polit­i­cal cul­ture, where women did not fig­ure as impor­tant. People in American polit­i­cal cul­ture, wom­en’s issues, did not fig­ure as impor­tant polit­i­cal issues in American culture. 

With respect to race. I mean the fact of the mat­ter is you know, that’s right Lyndon Johnson did a lot of good things, but the peo­ple who were the polit­i­cal class at that moment were vir­tu­al­ly all white men. It was a far less var­ie­gat­ed, diverse and there­fore a far less charged polit­i­cal envi­ron­ment than we have now. So, in an iron­ic way some of the things that we’re moan­ing about are actu­al­ly instead of us view­ing them as alto­geth­er bad things…in a large degree they’re good things. I mean you know, when there are new actors, you’re going to have fric­tion, you know. In the time that you’re talk­ing about, in strate­gic places in American polit­i­cal cul­ture, you did­n’t have Latinos, and blacks, and women, there­fore you did­n’t have the fric­tion. Now, you have that pres­ence, you have fric­tion. And you know, frankly it’s a good thing.

Bush: All I’m sayin—

Kennedy: It’s going to be tough.

Bush: All I’m say­ing is Johnson did…he got peo­ple to do things that they did­n’t expect that they were gonna do.

Kennedy: No, I agree with that. 

Bush: And that’s the sign of lead­er­ship that is the way you break through to this— The yet-to-be-defined sys­tem that we’re mov­ing towards—it’s unde­fined yet—that looks pret­ty ugly right now, it’s going to require that kind of cat­a­lyst of pub­lic lead­er­ship. And it exists all across the coun­try, it’s just not exist­ing right now in Washington. It’s just not…you know, it’s dead tem­porar­i­ly at least.

Wilentz: And it is about pol­i­tics in the end. I mean I think there’s a great deal of naiveté about how pol­i­tics actu­al­ly works. And this is where either wing—the Trump wing or the Sanders wing—don’t under­stand how pol­i­tics actu­al­ly works in Washington.

Bush: Coulda told the sto­ry of…on the Team of Rivals, about how the Emancipation Proclamation, how Lincoln got things done. I mean—

Wilentz: Keep on going with that movie. And show Lincoln—

Bush: Offering the Postmaster General—

Wilentz: —in the mid­dle of the [indis­tinct]. It was all— Getting the Thirteenth Amendment through was about pol­i­tics, how pol­i­tics oper­ates. It involves engage­ment, it involves under­stand­ing where your oppo­nen­t’s weak­ness­es are, but also not rip­ping him down, but fig­ur­ing out how to get it done. And this is an art which I think has been demo­nized, fun­ni­ly enough. The idea is oh, you’re just gonna come in there and take over and make it happen—make America great again cause I can do it. That’s not how pol­i­tics works in this coun­try. Never has been. 

And the same on the left. You know, the idea that we’re just gonna do what we’re gonna do, we’re gonna do it… There are oth­er peo­ple out there, who dis­agree with you. You’re going to have to get some­thing done. And you’re not gonna get it done by beat­ing them over the head, you’re going to get it done by being a polit­i­cal leader. 

Roger Berkowitz: Come back to the Randy’s point before. Because I thought it was real­ly impor­tant. I mean I think you’re absolute­ly right that we live in a changed cul­ture that has many more voic­es in it, that have to be lis­tened to, and let’s say less…dogmatic par­ti­san con­sis­ten­cy. And I think one of the things that we have right now is we have a nation­al system—a polit­i­cal system—that still sees itself as I think Anne said this before, lib­er­al and con­ser­v­a­tive. I’m not sure that if you look at peo­ple around the coun­try they’re all lib­er­al or con­ser­v­a­tive. They have very many dif­fer­ent view­points. There’s a lot of mul­ti­ple iden­ti­ties going on in this coun­try. Many peo­ple have three or four, or five, or six iden­ti­ties that they iden­ti­fy with. And we have cre­at­ed a nation­al polit­i­cal debate that fits peo­ple into cat­e­gories: left or right, con­ser­v­a­tive, Republican, Democrat, whatever. 

And one of the things we may need is to pull back, not sim­ply on mon­ey, but of a nation­al con­ver­sa­tion, and remind our­selves that you know, we may have to let peo­ple in dif­fer­ent parts of the coun­try and in dif­fer­ent com­mu­ni­ties live dif­fer­ent­ly. And lib­er­als are gonna have to make more room for peo­ple liv­ing in ways that they find prob­lem­at­ic, and con­ser­v­a­tives are gonna have to make more room for peo­ple liv­ing in ways that they find prob­lem­at­ic. And we’re gonna have to lis­ten to each oth­er in a much more intense way on a local lev­el than we cur­rent­ly are, when there’s the sense that you either have to be one or these oth­er things. And I think the change in who the American peo­ple are has far out­stripped the polit­i­cal con­ver­sa­tion. And we need to pay atten­tion to that.

Further Reference

Democracy Today in the USA event page

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.