Slavoj Žižek: Under cap­i­tal­ism, the prob­lem is not there are evil peo­ple here and there. The prob­lem is the basic log­ic of the sys­tem as it was devel­oped by Zygmunt Bauman and many oth­ers. Some peo­ple even claim that if you look in a non­hu­man­i­tar­i­an way just at the pure log­ic of today’s glob­al cap­i­tal­ism, you arrive at a ratio even some peo­ple claim of 2080%. That is to say again, if you dis­re­gard all human­i­tar­i­an prob­lems and just look at what would have been ide­al for the func­tion­ing of the sys­tem, basi­cal­ly the idea is that soon­er or lat­er 80% of the peo­ple are dis­pos­able, of no use. Because first, with new tech­nolo­gies we get unem­ploy­ment explod­ing. Each new tech­no­log­i­cal progress means that tens of thou­sands, even mil­lions of work­ers, not only [do] they get tem­porar­i­ly unem­ployed, but they get per­ma­nent­ly unemployable. 

The prob­lem in Europe espe­cial­ly, and that’s now one of the rea­sons of demon­stra­tions, protests, all around Europe is that there is an entire younger gen­er­a­tion of stu­dents sac­ri­ficed. They are study­ing at uni­ver­si­ties and they are aware in advance that they are dis­pos­able, of no use. That there will be no jobs for them and so on and so on. So you know, you are already [con­tributed? ] in advance unem­ployed. You know there will not be a place for you. 

Then an even more trag­ic phe­nom­e­non. You get what is called so-called failed coun­tries. You get whole coun­tries which are basi­cal­ly dis­pos­able. Or at least parts of the coun­tries. Recently I read a ter­ri­fy­ing report on Congo—not Kinshasa. The oth­er, to the west, Congo-Brazzaville, the French Congo. And it’s hor­ri­ble. It’s a coun­try in which inter­na­tion­al cap­i­tal is only inter­est­ed with regard to its oil reserves, which are all close to the Atlantic Ocean, the south­ern part. So we get there a tiny track, band, of land which is devel­oped but also extreme­ly pol­lut­ed, you know. All the oil is spilled, fish­es dead and so on. But rel­a­tive­ly rich. Things func­tion and so on. This is the low­er, close to the coast, 20%. 

And then inside you get 80% of the land, about which sim­ply nobody cares. Things are now, there, much more in decay, less devel­oped, than they were when Congo-Brazzaville was still a French colony. People have sim­ply for­got­ten. In the second-biggest city inside, elec­tric­i­ty does­n’t work [most] of the time, hos­pi­tals dis­ap­pear, etc. They are sim­ply out­side. And this may be the con­cept that we should elab­o­rate with regard to dis­pos­able life. This new form of apartheid. Namely, it’s no longer this clear racial dis­tinc­tion, but it’s an invis­i­ble dis­tinc­tion between inside and outside. 

Peter Sloterdijk, who is con­sid­ered a right winger— He is, but he’s intel­li­gent. One should read him. He devel­oped this idea that cap­i­tal­ism is like a gigan­tic sphere, a glob­al cupo­la, cov­er­ing us all. And he says the prob­lem is that once you are inside, it appears endless—you don’t even see the out­side. So, what I like about this idea is that usu­al­ly the empha­sis with glob­al capitalism—oh, it’s glob­al, every­thing is caught [up in it]. Yes, but at the same time it’s those who are in—part of the inter­na­tion­al mar­ket com­merce, and those who are sim­ply left out.

The para­dox we should bear in mind is that con­tem­po­rary cap­i­tal­ism, it is glob­al, but, the price is much greater invis­i­bil­i­ty of a part of it. Global means there is a globe. Which is not all-encompassing. It’s a globe where from with­in you think it’s end­less, you see it all, but no. It excludes parts of it. So that’s for me the great irony, okay. The Berlin Wall fell down, but I think the para­dox of glob­al cap­i­tal­ism is that it’s not that the Berlin Wall fell down and now we live all in one hap­py mar­ket uni­verse. No. New walls are emerg­ing. In a way they are much more strict because you are sim­ply not aware of the out­side. If you are aware, you are aware in the most dis­gust­ing human­i­tar­i­an way. 

To return to your big first ques­tion, dis­pos­able life. You know, the prob­lem is not just how to make every­thing use­ful. I think we should change the entire util­i­tar­i­an per­spec­tive. So I think— You know…here is a point I want to make. My favorite one, almost. I was at an archi­tec­tur­al con­fer­ence three years ago I think, in Australia, where a guy, think­ing he’s say­ing some­thing deep, opposed these kind of min­i­mal­ist bath­room objects—pipes and so on—done in this aes­thet­ic way and so on, to the cheap, kitsch ver­sion of some Arab shapes—you know, all in gold, with pearls and so on, think­ing that the first one is the true, use­ful one and so on, against decadence. 

And then I explod­ed and I was so glad that the major­i­ty of the peo­ple there sup­port­ed me. I told the guy, But did you real­ly vis­it slums? There, when­ev­er they can they can, they have pre­cise­ly this cheap imi­ta­tion of wealth, kitsch, and so on. To have this min­i­mal­ist, beau­ti­ful, appar­ent­ly util­i­tar­i­an ver­sion of plumb­ing and so on, only the very rich can afford it.” And I claim this is not some­thing to be mocked at. Poor peo­ple like kitsch, with all plas­tic col­ors and so on and so on. And they are right.

At a cer­tain point, I think the mar­ket sys­tem will break down. Look already today. I read some­where that a big Hollywood block­buster, even if it earns half a bil­lion around the world, much more peo­ple see it by down­load­ing and so on, not to men­tion music and so on. You see, com­mu­nism is arriv­ing here. Objects so far are already… So the only way I see it is— Okay, the prob­lem is then how to pay the artists, who will decide how. But it will have to be col­lec­tivized. Market will not work here. 

And again, the cru­cial thing is that this mod­ern cap­i­tal­ist or com­mu­nist regime, all the time want­ed some­how to eval­u­ate what art is use­ful and so on. But I don’t think you can break this cir­cle, you know. Because what is use­ful? For exam­ple, in com­mu­nist regimes they were usu­al­ly try­ing to con­trol polit­i­cal jokes. But the more we know about com­mu­nist regimes, the more it becomes clear that they were not so stu­pid. That they knew very well that polit­i­cal jokes mak­ing fun of their lead­ers play a cru­cial role in keep­ing peo­ple sat­is­fied, you know. You can ven­ti­late your anger, blah blah. So there are even crazy rumors which are prob­a­bly not true but I love them, that in com­mu­nist coun­tries there was always a secret depart­ment of the secret police whose func­tion was to pro­duce good polit­i­cal jokes. To keep peo­ple satisfied. 

So you see, some­thing may appear just a pure dis­trac­tion. No. It played a cru­cial role in sta­bi­liza­tion. And it’s the same in sci­ence. If you look at all great sci­en­tif­ic inven­tions, they did­n’t emerge in a planned way. It was some­thing total­ly use­less and so on, and all of a sud­den it becomes use­ful. What’s my con­clu­sion from this? We should aban­don this old [?] left­ist atti­tude which is today adopt­ed by all, you know like chil­dren are starv­ing in Africa” or what­ev­er, who has time for art” and so on and so on. Or what­ev­er. Non-productive expenditure.

No. It’s glob­al cap­i­tal­ism which is talk­ing like this today. It is Bill Gates who said once we should­n’t live in our ivory tow­er while peo­ple are starv­ing. No. I think the only thing that can save us is small things like chin­dogu, more uni­ver­si­ties where you do things which may appear use­less, and so on and so on. Without this we are caught in this log­ic of dis­pos­able life. We have to break out. We have to accept life in its mean­ing­less­ness, in plea­sures which serve noth­ing and so on and so on. Because the para­dox is that if you take away from human life things which serve noth­ing, then the remain­der, what remains, may be pure­ly func­tion­al but it real­ly serves noth­ing and every­thing collapses.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.