I was for­tu­nate to wit­ness the birth of the Internet up close. When the Web start­ed, it had only pages of text inter­con­nect­ed with hyper­links. But it had no peo­ple. I phoned one of the first Internet start‐ups, with a mis­sion to add peo­ple to the Web.

Exactly twen­ty years ago, the com­pa­ny launched the first social‐networking soft­ware, which includ­ed instant mes­sag­ing, voice over IP, chat rooms, web‐based events, col­lab­o­ra­tive brows­ing. You see the inter­face from twen­ty years ago. And the that’s where we start­ed. I sold the com­pa­ny. I bought it back. I sold it again. Then I got tired of buy­ing and sell­ing and decid­ed to go back to basic sci­ence.

I was very for­tu­nate to receive two ERC Advanced Grants. The first one to work on bio­mol­e­c­u­lar com­put­ers, which are molecular‐scale com­put­ers that can be pro­grammed to release drug mol­e­cules when and where they’re need­ed. The work received broad recog­ni­tion fol­low­ing. The sec­ond ERC grant is to dis­cov­er the human cell lin­eage tree. Knowledge of the human cell lin­eage tree will address many fun­da­men­tal impor­tant prob­lems in biol­o­gy and med­i­cine. For exam­ple, what is the ori­gin of metas­tases, which are the root cause of can­cer lethal­i­ty. And that’s an ongo­ing project.

But what hap­pened in the twen­ty years I was doing basic sci­ence? The inter­net has mush­roomed from zero to more than two bil­lion peo­ple. But what kind of civ­i­liza­tion did it become? If a bil­lion peo­ple decide they want to change the rules of a social net­work or replace its man­age­ment, can they do it? I don’t think it’s even con­ceiv­able.

So I think it’s fair to say that in the twen­ty years that have passed the inter­net has matured into its Middle Ages, in the sense that it now con­sists of feu­dal com­mu­ni­ties with feu­dal lords that con­trol every­thing, and bil­lions of serfs that have no a civ­il rights and can vote on noth­ing.

We know from his­to­ry that the Middle Ages were fol­lowed by the Age of Enlightenment. And one of the great thinkers of its time, John Stuart Mill, declared three basic rights. The right of thought and expres­sion. The right to pur­sue one’s tastes and inter­ests. (Both are sup­port­ed by the Internet in free coun­tries.) And the third, the right to assem­ble, or to unite. The right of assem­bly is a pre­con­di­tion for democ­ra­cy, because with­out the right to assem­ble you can­not take col­lec­tive action. You can­not form polit­i­cal par­ties.

My main point is that Internet tech­nol­o­gy today does not sup­port the right of assem­bly, and there­fore it can­not and does not sup­port democ­ra­cy. The rea­son is that even though we can eas­i­ly form groups on Google, Facebook, you name it, we don’t know who the peo­ple on the group are. A per­son [may not] be the per­son he says he is, or maybe mul­ti­ple per­son­ae are real­ly fakes oper­at­ed by the same per­son.

Fortunately, help is on its way. The United Nations and the World Bank have a goal to deploy elec­tron­ic iden­ti­ties for all of human­i­ty by two 2030. With elec­tron­ic iden­ti­ties, one can eas­i­ly ver­i­fy the per­son who is on the Internet and have con­firmed iden­ti­ty, and there­fore even­tu­al­ly sup­port the free­dom of assem­bly on the Internet. And then fol­low­ing it, we will also hope­ful­ly be able to form Internet democ­ra­cy.

But what kind of democ­ra­cy should the Internet fol­low? The Internet does not have the size and dis­tance lim­i­ta­tions that require rep­re­sen­ta­tive democ­ra­cy. On the oth­er hand, every­one vot­ing on every­thing all the time, although tech­ni­cal­ly pos­si­ble, is not prac­ti­cal. So which way should Internet go?

There is a new form of democ­ra­cy emerg­ing now on the Internet, which is a hybrid of rep­re­sen­ta­tive and direct democ­ra­cy, in which peo­ple can either vote direct­ly or del­e­gate their vote to some­one else they trust. Vote del­e­ga­tion can be once or ongo­ing, and can always be revoked or over­writ­ten. It requires very com­plex soft­ware and algo­rithms to do it. But what’s the Internet for if not for that?

So, del­ega­tive democ­ra­cy is like direct democ­ra­cy in that every vote is done by every­one, either direct­ly or via del­e­ga­tion. And it’s like pre­ven­ta­tive democ­ra­cy in that most of the time your votes are done by del­e­gates that you del­e­gate your vote to. There is a very small group of efforts in this area right now, but I believe that once elec­tron­ic IDs are broad­ly deployed, there will be a Cambrian explo­sion of democ­ra­cy on the inter­net, and we’ll have amaz­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic forums and com­mu­ni­ties that great­ly sur­pass Internet‐less democ­ra­cy.

Try to envi­sion a future in which the entire­ty of human­i­ty is unit­ed by say, a Facebook‐like demo­c­ra­t­ic com­mu­ni­ty. It’s like the United Nations except the mem­bers will not be nations, it will be the peo­ple them­selves. And what I’d like to ask you is whether this vision of unit­ed human­i­ty is com­pelling to you, and what would you be will­ing to do to make it hap­pen?

Thank you very much.


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.