Open Transcripts

Page 77 of 107

Decoding Workforce Productivity: Brian Ballard

presented by Brian Ballard

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is ush­er­ing in a sig­nif­i­cant increase in con­nect­ed machines, con­nect­ed prod­ucts. And at the same time, the peo­ple who are stand­ing next to these high­ly sophis­ti­cat­ed machines are ulti­mate­ly con­nect­ed in their home lives. They car­ry a cell phone that’s man­ag­ing their smart car, their smart home, their smart sys­tems. But they have almost no inter­ac­tion with the sys­tems at work.

Decoding Workforce Productivity: Benjamin Waber

presented by Benjamin Waber

I could ask you ques­tions about where your cus­tomers buy prod­ucts, or what sort of prod­ucts they buy. And you could give me very detailed answers. But I could ask rel­a­tive­ly sim­i­lar ques­tions about what goes on with­in your com­pa­ny that you can’t answer.

Decoding Workforce Productivity: Nita A. Farahany

presented by Nita A Farahany

Are there any lim­its to the con­nect­ed work­place? Are there any con­cerns about the con­nect­ed work­place? Is there any way in which you would­n’t want either your­self or an employ­ee to be con­nect­ed? Are there any lim­its to the kinds of infor­ma­tion we can gath­er in order to make our work­forces more pro­duc­tive? In order to make our over­all soci­ety more productive?

The Conversation #41 — John Fullerton

presented by Aengus Anderson, John Fullerton, Micah Saul

I actu­al­ly think you can trace many many of these big sys­temic crises to being symp­toms of the flawed idea that eco­nom­ic growth can go on indef­i­nite­ly, expo­nen­tial­ly, on a finite plan­et. That’s sort of my North Star. And then as a finance per­son, why do we think we need eco­nom­ic growth? Well, because the way our cap­i­tal sys­tem works is that cap­i­tal demands that growth.

Southern Discomfort — Confronting Culinary Injustice and Promoting Culinary Reconciliation in the Old South

presented by Michael Twitty

My job is to inte­grate the brands of exclu­sion cre­at­ing a world of south­ern American food, by rein­tro­duc­ing peo­ple to the African ances­tors of American cook­ing, and by exten­sion restor­ing respect and dig­ni­ty for what they gave.

On Guts

presented by David Chang

Why did we pick the theme? It seems that when I’m with René or oth­er chefs, younger cooks come up to us and they always ask, ​“How did you do it?” Or, ​“Why did you become suc­cess­ful?” Besides it being a team effort, I think it all starts with the seed, a plant of an idea, you know, plant­i­ng an idea.

The Conversation #40 — Mary Mattingly

presented by Aengus Anderson, Mary Mattingly, Micah Saul

It’s inter­est­ing and scary to think about an Earth that could be com­plete­ly con­trolled by humans, but it seems like it’s def­i­nite­ly pos­si­ble. I could find fun think­ing about liv­ing under the sea or all the places that humans real­ly haven’t been able to sus­tain them­selves in very well. Like, if we could real­ly get con­trol of that. I mean, it’s def­i­nite­ly a dark future, but I think some­thing that I could embrace if we did go there.

Forbidden Research: Messing with Nature Part II: Climate

presented by David Keith, Gernot Wagner, Stewart Brand

Solar geo­engi­neer­ing rests on a sim­ple idea that it is tech­ni­cal­ly pos­si­ble to make the Earth a lit­tle more reflec­tive so that it absorbs a lit­tle less sun­light, which would part­ly coun­ter­act some of the risks that come from accu­mu­lat­ing car­bon diox­ide in the atmos­phere. When I say tech­ni­cal­ly pos­si­ble, it appears that at least doing this in a crude way is actu­al­ly easy, in the sense that it could be done with com­mer­cial off-the-shelf tech­nolo­gies now, and it could be done at a cost that is real­ly triv­ial, sort of a part in a thou­sand or a part in ten thou­sand of glob­al GDP.

Forbidden Research: Against the Law: Countering Lawful Abuses of Digital Surveillance

presented by Bunnie Huang, Edward Snowden

When I announced the talk on Twitter, some­body imme­di­ate­ly was like, ​“Lawful abuse, isn’t that a con­tra­dic­tion?” But if you think about it for just a moment it might seem to be a lit­tle bit more clear. After all, the legal­i­ty of a thing is quite dis­tinct from the moral­i­ty of it.

Forbidden Research Welcome and Introduction: Cory Doctorow

presented by Cory Doctorow

At that moment when every­body is sud­den­ly car­ing about this stuff, that’s the moment at which nihilism can be avert­ed. It’s the moment in which nihilism must be avert­ed if you’re going to make a change. Peak indif­fer­ence is the moment when you stop con­vinc­ing peo­ple to care about an issue, and start con­vinc­ing them to do some­thing about it.

Page 77 of 107

← Previous

Next →

Common Tags

technology algorithms Histories of Violence artificial intelligence privacy Berkman Klein Center surveillance ethics Twitter infrastructure education Internet Carl Malamud Internet Hall of Fame 2013 art Geek of the Week religion community Internet Hall of Fame 2014 Internet Hall of Fame Internet history open source politics design New America

Some Random Transcripts

The Conversation #14 — John Zerzan
presented by Aengus Anderson, John Zerzan, Micah Saul

I always wonder about people that are very pro-tech on the Left, for example. "Oh, we've got to keep all this. Of course. That'd be crazy." You know, you want to preserve all of the level of technology. The question that occurs to me is, oh so you want to keep how many hundreds of millions of people in the mines, in the smelters, in the foundries, in the assembly lines? I would like to see them be able to do something else. But you're going to have to keep them there one way or another if you want to have all this stuff. Read more →

Knit One, Compute One
presented by Kris Howard

The very first line of any knitting pattern looks something like this, "Cast on 24 stitches." And that means to create that initial row of loops on the needle. Well I looked at that and my brain immediately recognized well that's just a for loop. Read more →

ASU KEDtalks: Democratizing Digital Design
presented by Jessica Rajko

Rather than begrudgingly pushing society forward to be ready, I ask designers to critically reflect on the limitations of their own design practices and to remember that to design for one intersection of society—namely, affluent middle-to-upper-class white American men—does not mean that those designs will work for those who do not identify as such. Even with modifications. Read more →