I’m just going to say it, I would like to completely blow up employment classification as we know it. I do not think that defining full‐time work as the place where you get benefits, and part‐time work as the place where you have to fight to get a full‐time job, is an appropriate way of addressing this labor market.
In experimental archaeology, we could for instance try to make the kind of shoes that our hunter‐gatherer ancestors might have had, and test how long they last in use.
But what if we are interested in completely different kinds of questions. Like, did they have rules for whom you’re allowed to have sex with? How did they raise their kids? We could always look at existing hunter‐gatherer cultures and guess that the culture might have been similar. But could we attempt to test our hypotheses, someway?
I see a set of constraints facing us in the future, and they’re all going to be very expensive. First is funding retirements for the Baby Boom generation. Second is continuing increases in the costs of healthcare. The third is replacing decaying infrastructure. The fourth is adapting to climate change and repairing environmental damage. The fifth is developing new sources of energy. The sixth is what I see as in all likelihood continuing high military costs. The seventh is the costs of innovation.
In this talk I want to suggest that it’s never quite as simple as to say there is technology and there is art. That there is technology and there is culture. Clearly these things have always been in dialogue and are still. So this means this is a story about art and technology.