Malavika Jarayam: I think devel­op­ments in arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence do pose a strong chal­lenge for human­i­ty. I think at a very fun­da­men­tal lev­el, peo­ple don’t quite under­stand what arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence is, yet it’s used as a buzz­word that’s going to solve every sin­gle prob­lem. You sort of have either a very bina­ry sort of treat­ment of it’s all won­der­ful, it’s all great, and it’s going to solve every prob­lem, or you have robot armies are going to kill every­one.

I think the first chal­lenge that we have is even the vocab­u­lary that we use to talk about devel­op­ments in AI. I see a lot of peo­ple in Asia (and also else­where in the world, to be fair) who use words like algo­rithms,” big data,” ana­lyt­ics,” arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence” to all mean pret­ty much the same thing. They use them as inter­change­able syn­onyms, and I think that does all of these tech­nolo­gies a dis­ser­vice because they’re not nec­es­sar­i­ly the same thing. You can have automa­tion that is not AI-driven. You can also have AI that is not just about automa­tion. So I think it’s a tech­nol­o­gy or a set of tech­nolo­gies that on some lev­el are very very opaque and inscrutable, yet they’re being talked about as if it’s the most com­mon, obvi­ous, every­day, ubiq­ui­tous thing.

Really what we’re try­ing to do is look at the impact of AI, specif­i­cal­ly on Asian coun­tries. And I think even with­in Asia it’s not a mono­lith­ic thing of you know, all of Asia is going to be treat­ed the same way or is going to react the same way. I think with­in Asia you have coun­tries that are going to be ear­ly adopters of AI, that are very geared up to advanced tech­nolo­gies. So coun­tries like Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, are prob­a­bly going to be a lit­tle bet­ter equipped. And I think a lot of the poor­er, devel­op­ing, emerg­ing economies are not quite there yet. I don’t think they quite under­stand what’s going to hit them when it does, and I think there’s a huge role for acad­e­mia to play in all of this to make sure that in the way that it devel­ops that it’s some­thing that has an eth­i­cal back­bone that is imple­ment­ed respon­si­bly, that has all the right stake­hold­ers involved in the decision-making about how these tech­nolo­gies are deployed. And I think that real­ly needs to be a very very robust con­ver­sa­tion. It’s not the tech­nol­o­gy com­pa­nies set­ting the stan­dards, and gov­ern­ments and aca­d­e­mics and social sci­en­tists hav­ing no say in how this hap­pens.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Square Cash, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.