Jean Franco: Well I sup­pose Foucault has to be cred­it­ed with talk­ing about dis­pos­able life. And it’s inter­est­ing to me that at the very moment when he was giv­ing the lec­tures on this top­ic, Henry Kissinger in the United States was admit­ting, or pub­lish­ing, the results of the com­mis­sion on ster­il­iza­tion. The idea was that ster­il­iza­tion should be encour­aged in Third World coun­tries in order to reg­u­late the pop­u­la­tion. It was almost exact­ly a blue­print of the kind of thing that Foucault was talk­ing about. In effect, ster­il­iza­tion was put into effect— It’d already been put into effect in Puerto Rico. It was put into effect in Brazil. And lat­er on in the regime of Fujimori in Peru, it would be prac­ticed in the high­lands, par­tic­u­lar­ly among indige­nous women. 

And I think this is one of the first points I want to make, that pop­u­la­tion con­trol very much was geared towards indige­nous pop­u­la­tions. As we know, the US was pro­found­ly inter­est­ed in Latin America dur­ing all this peri­od, and in fact were the iron hand behind a great many of the coups. I was in Guatemala when Árbenz was over­thrown by mer­ce­nar­ies paid for by the Americas. So I knew exact­ly what it meant. It meant the over­turn­ing of any kind of social pro­grams, social reform; the return of mil­i­tary regimes, which were to prove com­plete­ly deadly. 

In the 80s, what that meant was geno­cide. And it’s inter­est­ing that although this was sup­pos­ed­ly to con­trol or to put down insur­gent forces, which were quite small in Guatemala, the main brunt of the geno­cide was on the indige­nous peo­ples. And many many thou­sand of indige­nous peo­ples were killed, tor­tured, raped, dur­ing that par­tic­u­lar time. So this was the heavy hand of the US empire on Latin America. 

So this is what was meant, if you like, by dis­pos­able life. They put in, the Americans put in or tol­er­at­ed numer­ous dic­ta­tor­ships in the Southern Cone and in Central America. They sup­port­ed a regime in Colombia which was extreme­ly vio­lent. In fact, para­mil­i­tary forces in Colombia inau­gu­rat­ed the use of the elec­tric saw to saw off limbs of oppo­nents, the most ter­ri­ble case being that of Father [Tebusio? (poss. Father Tiberio Fernandez)], a lib­er­al Catholic priest who suf­fered that par­tic­u­lar death. His limbs were sawn off, his head was cut off and thrown into the riv­er. This was kind of a com­mon occur­rence in Colombia at this par­tic­u­lar peri­od. It was also a prac­tice that was tak­en up by the drug traf­fick­ers in Colombia, who were in league with the para­mil­i­tary. These drug traf­fick­ers then export­ed the sys­tem to Mexico, where of course behead­ings still go on, as well as at the Colombian prac­tice of putting mes­sages onto bod­ies to say why they were killed. So you know, they would put a sort of message—they would take some­body’s tongue out and put it down their throat, just to show to show he was an informer and so on. 

The atroc­i­ties were real­ly ter­ri­ble. And these have passed via the drug routes into Mexico and are prac­ticed now by the drug traf­fick­ers in Mexico. And this is one of the inter­est­ing things. I mean, one sees the reper­cus­sion of all these forces. First of all the sup­port of con­ser­v­a­tive regimes. The tol­er­ance of the para­mil­i­tary and the mil­i­tary, who were in Latin America dur­ing the 80s and ear­ly 90s respon­si­ble for the most hor­ren­dous tor­tures and the most hor­ren­dous killing. 

I think some­thing which has not real­ly ever been said enough is the respon­si­bil­i­ty of the US for this par­tic­u­lar sit­u­a­tion. Many, in fact I would say prob­a­bly near­ly all of the worst atroc­i­ties were com­mit­ted by peo­ple who were trained in the School of the Americas. The School of the Americas was run by the US. Partly in Georgia, it had a branch in Georgia and anoth­er in Panama. And if you can think of prob­a­bly the worst dic­ta­tors and the worst mil­i­tary lead­ers, they were trained in this par­tic­u­lar school. 

So this is some­thing which I feel ought to be fur­ther inves­ti­gat­ed. I don’t think it should be for­got­ten. Because where­as for instance if you think of Serbia, and Croatia, and Bosnia, there were war crime tri­bunals set up because of atroc­i­ties in those places. Those atroc­i­ties were absolute­ly no worse than the atroc­i­ties per­pe­trat­ed in Latin America. And the hand behind the per­pe­tra­tors was the US and the train­ing in the US at the School of the Americas. 

So this is one very seri­ous ques­tion, I think, when we’re talk­ing about dis­pos­able lives, the ease with which those Latin American lives were sac­ri­ficed in this par­tic­u­lar way, and with­out any kind of ret­ri­bu­tion or response. So that’s one par­tic­u­lar question.

The sec­ond ques­tion I want­ed to say is some­thing com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent. I’m talk­ing now about a dif­fer­ent Latin America. I mean, it’s a Latin America that’s come out from under dic­ta­tor­ships, which has for the most part fair­ly lib­er­al gov­ern­ments in Ecuador and Chile, in Argentina, Brazil. And who are attempt­ing reform, although under strict­ly lim­it­ed circumstances. 

Now, that is a sub­stan­tial change. But on the oth­er hand, oth­er prob­lems have tak­en over, for instance the prob­lem of the drug traf­fick­ing which I men­tioned. A sort of pri­va­ti­za­tion of atroc­i­ty that has been going on there. And what was very inter­est­ing to me about three or four months ago when I went to Mexico and gave a talk on zom­bies… This seems have noth­ing to do with the actu­al polit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion, but there’s a huge inter­est in zom­bies. And the zom­bies are seen as kind of sym­bols of our time, if you like. They’re the walk­ing dead. The walk­ing dead com­ing out to wreak hav­oc on the living. 

And in Mexico every year they have a zom­bie march which attracts absolute­ly thou­sands of young peo­ple who march through the cen­ter of Mexico dressed as zom­bies. And I kind of have a feel­ing there’s some sig­nif­i­cance in this. That where­as you know, we used to march against the atom­ic bomb or some­thing, or we would march against the Tory gov­ern­ment or what­ev­er, they’re march­ing as zom­bies. And you know, I sort of puz­zle, what does this mean in this par­tic­u­lar moment of civ­i­liza­tion? And it seems to me there’s a cer­tain apoc­a­lyp­tic moment that we’re approach­ing. That peo­ple do not have the same con­fi­dence in the future that oth­er gen­er­a­tions had. And that maybe this is some kind of prob­lem that we should be look­ing at, in par­tic­u­lar among young peo­ple. I mean, it seems to me a sort of ges­ture of hope­less­ness when you dress up as a zom­bie, adopt the zom­bie walk, and go through the main street of the city.

Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.