Dave White: My name is Dave White, and I’m a Professor in the School of Community Resources & Development at Arizona State University, and Director of the Decision Center for a Desert City.

I spent the sum­mer of 1998 raft­ing the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park, work­ing as a grad­u­ate stu­dent on a social sci­ence research project. I raft­ed more than 1,300 riv­er miles, and spent about six­ty nights sleep­ing under the most bril­liant stars imag­in­able. And this extra­or­di­nary expe­ri­ence inspired a com­mit­ment to ensure the sus­tain­abil­i­ty of per­haps the most sig­nif­i­cant nat­ur­al resource in the West, Colorado River water.

Now, riv­er rapids around the world are mea­sured on a six-point scale, with Class I being easy—little rif­fles of water and no risk. Now, Class VI are vio­lent, tur­bu­lent rapids—waterfalls real­ly, with sig­nif­i­cant risk of injury or even death, where res­cue may be impos­si­ble. Now the white­wa­ter rapids on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park are so wild that they are mea­sured on a ten-point scale. When you reach riv­er mile 179, you encounter the biggest and most fierce white­wa­ter rapid in Grand Canyon, Lava Falls. It is a ten.

To run Lava Falls in a riv­er raft, you have to nav­i­gate a series of ter­ri­fy­ing obsta­cles. Stay to the right of the Ledge Hole!, a waterfall—really stand­ing wave, thirty-seven feet tall that can suck in the boat, toss the rafters into the water, and trap your raft in a per­ma­nent spin cycle. Now, pow­er for­ward hard and punch through the V wave! Watch out for the Cheese Grater, a huge boul­der on riv­er right. Just like that, thir­ty ter­ri­fy­ing exhil­a­rat­ing sec­onds lat­er, you’re through. What’s the reward for run­ning Lava Falls in a riv­er raft? You pull over at Tequila Beach. Celebrate. But be pre­pared to help out with the next group of rafters.

Now some­times, of course, there is con­flict on the riv­er. Rafters dis­agree about the best path to take through the rapids. People argue about which chal­lenge is the most dan­ger­ous, or deny there’s any dan­ger at all. And some­times, after camp­ing with peo­ple for two weeks, you just don’t like each oth­er very much. Now run­ning Lava Falls takes courage. It takes skill, and expe­ri­enced lead­er­ship. And, more than any­thing it takes team­work. Your pow­er to nav­i­gate the rapids comes from every­one in the raft, pulling togeth­er in the same direc­tion at the same time, toward a com­mon pur­pose.

The sto­ry of run­ning Lava Falls is the sto­ry of the Colorado River in the American West today. Right now, we are in those rel­a­tive­ly calm waters above the rapids, enjoy­ing the beau­ti­ful canyon scenery. But, now we begin to hear the omi­nous roar. In the American West we face chal­lenges man­ag­ing the Colorado River. Instead of the Ledge Hole, the Cheese Grater, or argu­ments between rafters, we face pop­u­la­tion growth, drought, cli­mate change, and con­flicts between the states. The solu­tions to these prob­lems will require courage, skilled and expe­ri­enced lead­er­ship, and col­lab­o­ra­tion.

The Colorado River is the lifeblood of the American West. It pro­vides water to one in ten Americans across the West in cities like Phoenix, Las Vegas, Denver, and Los Angeles. Hydro pow­er plants along the riv­er pro­vide low-carbon renew­able elec­tric­i­ty. The water irri­gates mil­lions of acres of land to grow crops like alfal­fa, cot­ton, and let­tuce. The riv­er sup­ports nation­al wildlife refuges, and nation­al parks includ­ing Grand Canyon, stim­u­lat­ing over a bil­lion dol­lars in annu­al tourism rev­enue. And the riv­er is inte­gral to the his­to­ry, cul­ture, econ­o­my, of dozens of Native American tribes.

Through a hun­dred years of col­lab­o­ra­tion, pro­duc­tive con­flict, plan­ning, and mar­vels of engi­neer­ing, we devel­oped a remark­ably robust and resilient water sys­tem that sup­port­ed eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment and pop­u­la­tion growth across the region. The sys­tem was man­aged most­ly by tech­ni­cal experts. Lawyers, politi­cians, and engineers—a group we affec­tion­ate­ly call the Water Buffaloes.”

Now, my under­grad­u­ate degree was in American his­to­ry, so I tend to think to under­stand our cur­rent and future chal­lenges, we must look to the past. The Colorado River is man­aged through a patch­work of deci­sions, laws, and court reg­u­la­tions that are col­lec­tive­ly known as the Law of the River. These agree­ments guide the allo­ca­tion of the water between sev­en US states, and the nation of Mexico. The foun­da­tion of it all is the Colorado River Compact of 1922, which defined the rela­tion­ship between the Upper Basin states of New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado—where most of the water orig­i­nates, and the Lower Basin States of Arizona California, and Nevada, where most of the water demands were devel­op­ing.

When the states could­n’t agree on how to divide the water, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment inter­vened. The riv­er would be divid­ed equal­ly, with each basin get­ting the right to devel­op 7.5 mil­lion acre-feet of water annu­al­ly. An acre-foot is a water man­age­ment term. It’s the amount of water need­ed to flood one acre of land to the depth of one foot, or about the amount of water need­ed for two to four house­holds in the Southwest for a year. Later, anoth­er 1.5 mil­lion acre-feet was promised to Mexico. That’s 16.5 mil­lion acre-feet in annu­al allo­ca­tions. Remember that num­ber, 16.5 mil­lion acre-feet in annu­al allo­ca­tions. It will emerge fur­ther down the riv­er like a boul­der hid­den in the rapids.

Over the next eighty years or so, we all nav­i­gat­ed the riv­er pret­ty well togeth­er. Yes there were law­suits. In 1964 the Supreme Court set­tled a twenty-five year-old dis­pute between California and Arizona, rul­ing in Arizona’s favor. Following that deci­sion, Arizona gained approval from Congress to build the Central Arizona Project canal, a $4 bil­lion aque­duct to pump Colorado River water 300 miles across the desert, uphill, from Lake Havasu City to Phoenix and down to Tucson. The CAP canal was com­plet­ed in 1985, and it sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduced Arizona’s reliance on ground­wa­ter.

However, as part of the polit­i­cal bar­gain­ing in Congress to get the CAP canal com­plet­ed, Arizona agreed to give up all of its Colorado River water dur­ing times of severe short­age, even before California los­es a sin­gle drop. The deci­sion was crit­i­cal to keep all of the rafters pad­dling in the same direc­tion at the time.

By the turn of the 21st cen­tu­ry some new prob­lems were emerg­ing, like flash floods alter­ing the course of the riv­er, cre­at­ing new and more treach­er­ous obsta­cles. Let’s start with the promis­es we’ve made com­pared to what the riv­er can deliv­er. Remember that num­ber? 16.5 mil­lion acre-feet in annu­al allo­ca­tions. Well, it turns out when we divid­ed up the riv­er, we based our esti­mates on an extreme­ly wet peri­od, when the ten-year aver­age was about eigh­teen mil­lion acre-feet. Well, the long-term aver­age annu­al flow is more like 14.8 mil­lion acre-feet. So we’ve promised about 1.5 mil­lion acre-feet more than the riv­er has deliv­ered.

That was­n’t a prob­lem for a long time since the states weren’t using all of the water that they were allo­cat­ed. And the basin-wide stor­age capac­i­ty is about six­ty mil­lion acre-feet, or four times the annu­al flow. But as states like Arizona devel­oped and began to use their full allo­ca­tion, the supply/demand bal­ance began to get tighter and tighter and tighter, like canyon walls clos­ing in on our rafts.

Then came the drought. Since 2000, we have seen the dri­est sixteen-year peri­od in the last 100 years. And one of the dri­est peri­ods in the last thir­teen hun­dred years. The ten-year aver­age is now down to 13.4 mil­lion acre-feet. Those reser­voirs that have been so impor­tant, Lake Powell and Lake Mead, are down to about half of their capac­i­ty. Recently, we’ve seen the low­est lev­el since the dams were com­plet­ed. If those reser­voirs con­tin­ue to decline and Lake Mead reach­es a crit­i­cal thresh­old of 1,075 feet above sea lev­el, the Secretary of Interior will declare an offi­cial short­age on the riv­er. Under the rules set forth in a 2007 agree­ment between the states, Arizona los­es about 10% of its Colorado River water. If the lake drops low­er, the cuts get worse. Remember, accord­ing to the bar­gain Arizona los­es all of its allo­ca­tion before California los­es any­thing. And if the lake lev­els drop too low, the dams can’t pro­duce pow­er.

On top of these issues comes cli­mate change. According to the National Climate Assessment, our region will face ris­ing tem­per­a­tures, which increas­es demand. And decreas­ing pre­cip­i­ta­tion, which dimin­ish­es sup­ply. Taking all of these fac­tors into con­sid­er­a­tion, a major study con­clud­ed that with­out new inter­ven­tions, a 3.2 mil­lion acre-foot imbal­ance could exist by 2060. That’s the water need­ed to sup­ply ten mil­lion house­holds in the West.

The rapids are roar­ing. Some of the rafters are argu­ing with one anoth­er. The riv­er guide is try­ing to keep every­one pad­dling togeth­er. How will we make it through?

First of all we need to under­stand that the solu­tions for the next 100 years are dif­fer­ent than the solu­tions from the last cen­tu­ry. These new solu­tions are based on coop­er­a­tion, and the recog­ni­tion that the vital­i­ty of the American West depends on every­one pad­dling togeth­er. At Arizona State University, the Decision Center for a Desert City is work­ing to bring togeth­er sci­en­tists with water man­agers, pol­i­cy­mak­ers, envi­ron­men­tal­ists, farm­ers, and oth­er stake­hold­ers to coop­er­a­tive­ly devel­op the solu­tions, the knowl­edge, that we need to fos­ter sus­tain­abil­i­ty.

These solu­tions include man­ag­ing demand through smart conservation-based incen­tives: tech­nol­o­gy and pric­ing; expand­ing the reuse and recy­cling of reclaimed water; devel­op­ing cli­mate adap­ta­tion plans; and fos­ter­ing more inno­v­a­tive and adap­tive insti­tu­tions; and focus­ing our water deci­sion­mak­ing on max­i­miz­ing the eco­nom­ic and qual­i­ty of life ben­e­fits of each gal­lon of water invest­ed.

And there is increas­ing evi­dence that these solu­tions are work­ing. Cities across the West are becom­ing remark­ably effi­cient. The city of for Phoenix for instance has reduced its per capi­ta con­sump­tion by 30% over the last twen­ty years. This allowed the city to add over a mil­lion new res­i­dents and use the same total amount of water. In the Phoenix region, we now recy­cle almost 90% of our waste­water, and use that water for pro­duc­ing pow­er, irri­gat­ing crops, and water­ing land­scapes.

Climate plan­ning is now reg­u­lar­ly incor­po­rat­ed into water man­age­ment across the West. Federal agen­cies are learn­ing to antic­i­pate and adapt. At the Decision Center for a Desert City, we devel­oped WaterSim. We worked with stake­hold­ers to build a dynam­ic water bal­ance mod­el to explore how water sus­tain­abil­i­ty is influ­enced by var­i­ous sce­nar­ios of pop­u­la­tion growth, drought, cli­mate change impacts, and water man­age­ment deci­sions. We’re using this mod­el to test dif­fer­ent poli­cies and to encour­age col­lab­o­ra­tion.

We’re becom­ing more inno­v­a­tive and adap­tive in our insti­tu­tions. Recently the cities of Phoenix and Tucson entered into a water-sharing agree­ment that will encour­age ground­wa­ter aquifer recharge in both areas and save the cities mil­lions of dol­lars. Along with the city of Phoenix, the Decision Center for a Desert City launched the Western Mayors Water and Climate Summit to cre­ate a net­work of cities work­ing at the cut­ting edge of sus­tain­abil­i­ty and shar­ing best prac­tices. The Bureau of Reclamation devel­oped the Pilot System Conservation Program to encour­age water con­ser­va­tion across the basin, unleash­ing the pow­er of inno­va­tion and entre­pre­neur­ship.

And the states are not wait­ing for a dec­la­ra­tion of short­age to occur. The lead­ers of the states of Arizona, California, and Nevada are work­ing right now to nego­ti­ate a vol­un­tary cur­tail­ment in advance of any fed­er­al dec­la­ra­tion, to ensure that we can main­tain water in the basin and keep those lake lev­els above the crit­i­cal thresh­olds. This is bold lead­er­ship, and the states deserve cred­it for engag­ing in these delib­er­a­tions ahead of the cri­sis. California has even agreed to take cut­backs in their deliv­er­ies to avoid that big boul­der in the mid­dle of the riv­er.

Courage, lead­er­ship, team­work. These are the qual­i­ties that it takes to run Lava Falls in a riv­er raft, and these are the same qual­i­ties that it will take to solve our sus­tain­abil­i­ty chal­lenges in the Colorado River Basin. We’ve made it through some big rapids in the past. But the biggest tests are yet to come. Let’s all pull togeth­er, dig those pad­dles into the water, and have some fun along the way. Thank you.


Help Support Open Transcripts

If you found this useful or interesting, please consider supporting the project monthly at Patreon or once via Cash App, or even just sharing the link. Thanks.